Isolating intrinsic noise sources in a stochastic genetic switch

The stochastic mutual repressor model is analysed using perturbation methods. This simple model of a gene circuit consists of two genes and three promotor states. Either of the two protein products can dimerize, forming a repressor molecule that binds to the promotor of the other gene. When the repressor is bound to a promotor, the corresponding gene is not transcribed and no protein is produced. Either one of the promotors can be repressed at any given time or both can be unrepressed, leaving three possible promotor states. This model is analysed in its bistable regime in which the deterministic limit exhibits two stable fixed points and an unstable saddle, and the case of small noise is considered. On small timescales, the stochastic process fluctuates near one of the stable fixed points, and on large timescales, a metastable transition can occur, where fluctuations drive the system past the unstable saddle to the other stable fixed point. To explore how different intrinsic noise sources affect these transitions, fluctuations in protein production and degradation are eliminated, leaving fluctuations in the promotor state as the only source of noise in the system. The process without protein noise is then compared to the process with weak protein noise using perturbation methods and Monte Carlo simulations. It is found that some significant differences in the random process emerge when the intrinsic noise source is removed.

[1]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Mark Dykman,et al.  Large fluctuations and optimal paths in chemical kinetics , 1994 .

[3]  Peter Hänggi,et al.  Bistable systems: Master equation versus Fokker-Planck modeling , 1984 .

[4]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[5]  Bernard J. Matkowsky,et al.  Diffusion across characteristic boundaries with critical points , 1983 .

[6]  Khachik Sargsyan,et al.  Extinction Times for Birth-Death Processes: Exact Results, Continuum Asymptotics, and the Failure of the Fokker-Planck Approximation , 2004, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[7]  Bernard J. Matkowsky,et al.  A direct approach to the exit problem , 1990 .

[8]  Vahid Shahrezaei,et al.  Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Robert S. Maier,et al.  Limiting Exit Location Distributions in the Stochastic Exit Problem , 1994, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[10]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  C. Gardiner.  Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[12]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Models of stochastic gene expression , 2005 .

[13]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[14]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[15]  P. Bressloff.  Metastable states and quasicycles in a stochastic Wilson-Cowan model of neuronal population dynamics. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[17]  Anirvan M. Sengupta,et al.  Optimal path to epigenetic switching. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Alex Kamenev,et al.  Switching rates of multistep reactions. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  K. Vahala.  Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences , 1986, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[21]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[22]  Paul C. Du Chateau,et al.  Applied Partial Differential Equations , 1990, The Mathematical Gazette.

[23]  James P Keener,et al.  Perturbation analysis of spontaneous action potential initiation by stochastic ion channels. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Transition Path Theory for Markov Jump Processes , 2009, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[25]  James P. Keener,et al.  An Asymptotic Analysis of the Spatially Inhomogeneous Velocity-Jump Process , 2011, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[26]  H. Qian,et al.  A Quasistationary Analysis of a Stochastic Chemical Reaction: Keizer’s Paradox , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[27]  Peter Talkner,et al.  Mean first passage time and the lifetime of a metastable state , 1987 .

[28]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Epigenetics as a first exit problem. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[29]  Stefan Zeiser,et al.  Autocatalytic genetic networks modeled by piecewise-deterministic Markov processes , 2010, Journal of mathematical biology.

[30]  S. Swain.  Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences , 1984 .

[31]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Self-regulating gene: an exact solution. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Robert Hinch,et al.  Exponentially slow transitions on a Markov chain: the frequency of Calcium Sparks , 2005, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[33]  Stefan Zeiser,et al.  Hybrid Modeling of Noise Reduction by a Negatively Autoregulated System , 2009, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[34]  D. Ludwig.  Persistence of Dynamical Systems under Random Perturbations , 1975 .

[35]  Zaida Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Determining the stability of genetic switches: explicitly accounting for mRNA noise. , 2011, Physical review letters.