You're Hired: Examining Acceptance of Social Media Screening of Job Applicants

The paper examines attitudes towards employers using social media to screen job applicants. In an online survey of 454 participants, we compare the comfort level with this practice in relation to different types of information that can be gathered from publicly accessible social media. The results revealed a nuanced nature of people’s information privacy expectations in the context of hiring practices. People’s perceptions of employers using social media to screen job applicants depends on (1) whether or not they are currently seeking employment (or plan to), (2) the type of information that is being accessed by a prospective employer (if there are on the job market), and (3) their cultural background, but not gender. The findings emphasize the need for employers and recruiters who are relying on social media to screen job applicants to be aware of the types of information that may be perceived to be more sensitive by applicants, such as social network-related information.

[1]  A. Olafsen,et al.  Employer branding: employer attractiveness and the use of social media , 2013 .

[2]  Vincent Cho,et al.  The Effectiveness of Short Message Service for Communication With Concerns of Privacy Protection and Conflict Avoidance , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Communication-minded visualization : A call to action , 2006 .

[4]  Anita L. Blanchard,et al.  Online Exclusion: Biases That May Arise When Using Social Media in Talent Acquisition , 2016 .

[5]  Helen Kennedy,et al.  Engaging with (big) data visualizations: Factors that affect engagement and resulting new definitions of effectiveness , 2016, First Monday.

[6]  D. Seligmann,et al.  Comparing privacy attitudes of knowledge workers in the U.S. and India , 2010, ICIC '10.

[7]  Julie S. Zide,et al.  LinkedIn and recruitment: how profiles differ across occupations , 2014 .

[8]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[9]  G. B. Schmidt,et al.  Legal Concerns When Considering Social Media Data in Selection , 2016 .

[10]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  International Differences in Information Privacy Concerns: A Global Survey of Consumers , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[11]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  Social Networking Profiles: An Examination of Student Attitudes Regarding Use and Appropriateness of Content , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  Babajide Osatuyi,et al.  Empirical Examination of Information Privacy Concerns Instrument in the Social Media Context , 2015, AIS Trans. Replication Res..

[13]  Adam W. Meade,et al.  Examining Applicant Reactions to the Use of Social Networking Websites in Pre-Employment Screening , 2013, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[14]  Ivana Pais,et al.  Predictors of job seekers' self-disclosure on social media , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[16]  David G. Rand,et al.  The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Seounmi Youn,et al.  Gender and Online Privacy among Teens: Risk Perception, Privacy Concerns, and Protection Behaviors , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[19]  K. Sheehan,et al.  An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors , 1999 .

[20]  S. Mckay,et al.  Student Awareness of the Use of Social Media Screening by Prospective Employers , 2014 .

[21]  Mark Harcourt,et al.  Online social networks: an emergent recruiter tool for attracting and screening , 2013 .

[22]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[23]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  David J. Hauser,et al.  Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.

[25]  Jared Z. Ferrell,et al.  Is John Smith Really John Smith? Misrepresentations and Misattributions of Candidates Using Social Media and Social Networking Sites , 2016 .

[26]  Yang Wang,et al.  Who Is Concerned about What? A Study of American, Chinese and Indian Users' Privacy Concerns on Social Network Sites - (Short Paper) , 2011, TRUST.

[27]  Adam W. Meade,et al.  Big Five Personality Traits Reflected in Job Applicants' Social Media Postings , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  R. Landers,et al.  Social Media in Employee Selection and Recruitment: An Overview , 2016 .

[29]  Srdjan Capkun,et al.  Home is safer than the cloud!: privacy concerns for consumer cloud storage , 2011, SOUPS.

[30]  Peter A. Rosen,et al.  Social Networking Websites , Personality Ratings , and the Organizational Context : More Than Meets the Eye ? , 2012 .

[31]  Amar Cheema,et al.  Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples , 2013 .