Evolution of Life Histories in Response to Age-Specific Mortality Factors

A life-history model from the literature (Schaffer 1974; Charlesworth and Leon 1976) is extended to study the relationship of life-history evolution to age-specific mortality factors. It is shown that an increase in mortality during one age class (j) selects for an increase in reproductive effort before and a decrease after the afflicted age class. However, density dependence in age classes subsequent to j could lead to an increase in reproductive effort for these ages. It is also shown that evolution of reproductive effort leads to the greatest proportionate withdrawal of reproductive value from those adult age classes plagued by new mortality factors. Hence, the commonly observed inverse relationship between reproductive value and mortality is provided with a theoretical underpinning. The smaller the existing survival through age j, the greater the evolutionary sensitivity of reproductive value and reproductive effort to changes in survival through age j. An application of the theory concerns Slobodkin's (1974) hypothesis of prey evolution, prudent predation, which is discussed. Extension of the results to mortality factors which affect multiple age classes is sketched.

[1]  Selection in populations with overlapping generations. 3. Conditions for genetic equilibrium. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[2]  James P. Collins,et al.  Environmental Certainty, Trophic Level, and Resource Availability in Life History Evolution , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[3]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Coevolution and Stability of Competing Species , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[5]  L. Slobodkin.  Growth and regulation of animal populations , 1962 .

[6]  J. Harper,et al.  Studies in the Dynamics of Plant Populations: II. Components and Regulation of a Natural Population of Rumex Acetosella L. , 1968 .

[7]  W. Hamilton.  The moulding of senescence by natural selection. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  M. Wade,et al.  The Prudent Prey and the Prudent Predator , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[9]  D. Cushing.  Recruitment and parent stock in fishes , 1973 .

[10]  C. Istock.  THE EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX LIFE CYCLE PHENOMENA: AN ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE , 1967, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  C. Istock.  MORE ON COMPLEX LIFE CYCLES , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  W. Ricker.  Stock and Recruitment , 1954 .

[13]  Brian Charlesworth,et al.  The Relation of Reproductive Effort to Age , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[14]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Selection for Optimal Life Histories: The Effects of Age Structure , 1974 .

[15]  D. B. Mertz.  Senescent Decline in Flour Beetle Strains Selected for Early Adult Fitness , 1975, Physiological Zoology.

[16]  G. Holton.  Sociobiology: the new synthesis? , 1977, Newsletter on science, technology & human values.

[17]  David Pimentel,et al.  Animal Population Regulation by the Genetic Feed-Back Mechanism , 1961, The American Naturalist.

[18]  E. Charnov,et al.  Life-History Consequences of Natural Selection: Cole's Result Revisited , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[19]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[20]  R. Lewontin,et al.  The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change , 2022 .

[21]  R. Law,et al.  LIFE‐HISTORY VARIATION IN POA ANNUA , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  R. C. May.  Larval Mortality in Marine Fishes and the Critical Period Concept , 1974 .

[23]  Virginia C. Maiorana.  Reproductive Value, Prudent Predators, and Group Selection , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[24]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[25]  J. Hjort,et al.  Fluctuations in the Great Fisheries of Northern Europe: Viewed in the Light of Biological Research , 1914 .

[26]  W. S. Parker,et al.  Age-Specific Reproductive Tactics , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[27]  C. Istock,et al.  ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE PITCHER‐PLANT MOSQUITO. 2. THE SUBSTRUCTURE OF FITNESS , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  N. Hairston,et al.  Response of Daphnia population size and age structure to predation , 1975 .

[29]  G. Caughley.  Mortality Patterns in Mammals , 1966 .

[30]  A. Comfort.  Ageing : the biology of senescence , 1964 .

[31]  C. Istock,et al.  ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE PITCHER‐PLANT MOSQUITO. 3. RESOURCE TRACKING BY A NATURAL POPULATION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[33]  J. Harper,et al.  The Demography of Plants , 1974 .

[34]  William H. Bossert,et al.  Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[35]  G. I. Murphy.  Vital Statistics of the Pacific Sardine (Sardinops Caerulea) and the Population Consequences. , 1967, Ecology.

[36]  S. Stearns.  Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[37]  D. Tinkle,et al.  Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Lawrence B. Slobodkin,et al.  Prudent Predation Does Not Require Group Selection , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Paul L. Errington,et al.  Predation and Vertebrate Populations , 1946, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[40]  J. Ogden.  The Reproductive Strategy of Higher Plants: II. The Reproductive Strategy of Tussilago Farfara L. , 1974 .

[41]  J. Harper,et al.  Studies on plant demography Ranunculus repens L., R. bulbosus L. and R. acris L. I. Population flux and survivorship , 1973 .