Evaluation of the AgDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDRIFT model

A systematic evaluation of the AgDISP algorithms, which simulate off-site drift and deposition of aerially applied pesticides, contained in the AgDRIFT model was performed by comparing model simulations to field-trial data collected by the Spray Drift Task Force. Field-trial data used for model evaluation included 161 separate trials of typical agriculture aerial applications under a wide range of application and meteorological conditions. Input for model simulations included information on the aircraft and spray equipment, spray material, meteorology, and site geometry. The model input datasets were generated independently of the field deposition results, i.e., model inputs were in no way altered or selected to improve the fit of model output to field results. AgDRIFT shows a response similar to that of the field observations for many application variables (e.g., droplet size, application height, wind speed). However, AgDRIFT is sensitive to evaporative effects, and modeled deposition in the far-field responds to wet bulb depression whereas the field observations did not. The model tended to overpredict deposition rates relative to the field data for far-field distances, particularly under evaporative conditions. AgDRIFT was in good agreement with field results for estimating near-field buffer zones needed to manage human, crop, livestock, and ecological exposure.

[1]  R. Parrish,et al.  A method for testing whether model predictions fall within a prescribed factor of true values, with an application to pesticide leaching , 1990 .

[2]  Kenneth H. Reckhow,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of Mechanistic Water‐Quality Models , 1990 .

[3]  T. B. Curbishley,et al.  AgDrift®: A model for estimating near‐field spray drift from aerial applications , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[4]  M. B. Beck,et al.  On the problem of model validation for predictive exposure assessments , 1997 .

[5]  Steven G. Perry,et al.  Off‐Target Deposition of Pesticides from Agricultural Aerial Spray Applications , 1996 .

[6]  Milton E. Teske,et al.  AGDISP: The Aircraft Spray Dispersion Model, Code Development and Experimental Validation , 1989 .

[7]  A. Venkatram A framework for evaluating air quality models , 1982 .

[8]  Wesley E. Yates,et al.  Evaluation of Drift Residues from Aerial Applications , 1966 .

[9]  Wesley E. Yates,et al.  Drift Hazards Related to Ultra-Low-Volume and Diluted Sprays Applied by Agricultural Aircraft , 1967 .

[10]  J. Maybank,et al.  Spray Drift from Agricultural Pesticide Applications , 1978 .

[11]  Dennis McLaughlin,et al.  A stochastic approach to model validation , 1992 .

[12]  R. E. Mickle,et al.  The Influence of Atmospheric Stability on Wind Drift from Ultra-Low-volume Aerial Forest Spray Applications , 1994 .

[13]  W. H. Severns,et al.  Air conditioning and refrigeration , 1964 .

[14]  David R. Miller,et al.  Deposition of Aerially Applied BT in an Oak Forest and Its Prediction with the FSCBG Model , 1992 .

[15]  David R Johnson,et al.  Development of the Spray Drift Task force database for aerial applications , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[16]  W P Cahill,et al.  Pesticide drift: aerial applications comparing conventional flooding vs. raindrop nozzles. , 1975, Journal of economic entomology.

[17]  Duane A. Haugen A Simplified Method for Automatic Computation of Turbulent Wind Direction Statistics , 1963 .

[18]  Milton E. Teske,et al.  EVAPORATION RATES OF AGRICULTURAL SPRAY MATERIAL AT LOW RELATIVE WIND SPEEDS , 1998 .

[19]  J. W. Ray,et al.  Evaluation of FSCBG — An Aerial Application Simulation Model , 1995 .

[20]  N. B. Akesson,et al.  Criteria for Minimizing Drift Residues on Crops Downwind from Aerial Applications , 1974 .

[21]  Leonard Bridgeman,et al.  Jane's All the World's Aircraft , 1970 .

[22]  Beat Kleiner,et al.  Graphical Methods for Data Analysis , 1983 .

[23]  J. W. Barry,et al.  FSCBG: An aerial spray dispersion model for predicting the fate of released material behind aircraft , 1993 .