Assessing the Big-Five Personality Domains via Short Forms A Cautionary Note and a Proposal

This research evaluated a German version of a recently introduced brief measure of the Big-Five domains (Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)). Since we could not confirm the virtues of the TIPI in a representative, general population-based sample from Germany, we develop a revised short form, measuring the Big-Five personality domains with 16 adjectives. These new scales showed better reliability than the TIPI, fit the Big-Five factor structure, and were orthogonal. As preliminary evidence of construct validity, support was found for convergence correlations with the NEO-FFI and other criterion measures. Although somewhat inferior to standard Big-Five instruments, this brief adjective measure can stand as reasonable proxy for longer Big-Five measures when research conditions do not allow the use of longer instruments.

[1]  P. Costa,et al.  Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[3]  Peter H. Langford,et al.  A One-minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and abridging Shafer's (1999a) Big Five markers , 2003 .

[4]  Stephen A. Woods,et al.  Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale , 2005 .

[5]  Michael W. Bridges,et al.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Personality Assessment Exploring Issues of Personality Measurement and Structure through the Development of a Short Form of the Eysenck Personality Profiler , 2022 .

[7]  P. Y. Herzberg,et al.  Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg , 2003 .

[8]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[9]  L. A. Pervin Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[10]  P M Bentler,et al.  A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. , 1995, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[11]  J. M. Digman Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Ronald R. Holden,et al.  The NEO five-factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women , 1994 .

[13]  D. W. Drewes,et al.  Beyond the Spearman-Brown: a structural approach to maximal reliability. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[14]  J. Rossier,et al.  Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples , 2005 .

[15]  Helfried Moosbrugger,et al.  Evaluating the dimensionality of the Eysenck Personality Profiler—German version (EPP-D)☆: a contribution to the Super Three vs. Big Five Discussion , 2002 .

[16]  P. Costa,et al.  Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. , 1996 .

[17]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[18]  Filip De Fruyt,et al.  The Five-Factor Personality Inventory as a Measure of the Five-Factor Model , 2004, Assessment.

[19]  D. Ones,et al.  Measurement Error in “Big Five Factors” Personality Assessment: Reliability Generalization across Studies and Measures , 2000 .

[20]  Tenko Raykov,et al.  On the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research , 1998 .

[21]  J. Stöber Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität , 1999 .

[22]  M. Schmitt,et al.  Vorschlag zur Vereinfachung des Beck-Depressions-Inventars (BDI) , 2000 .

[23]  J. Block A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[25]  A. Satorra,et al.  Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. , 1994 .