IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?

Many companies have developed strategies that include investing heavily in information technology (IT) in order to enhance their performance. Yet, this investment pays off for some companies but not others. This study proposes that organization learning plays a significant role in determining the outcomes of IT. Drawing from resource theory and IT literature, the authors develop the concept of IT competency. Using structural equations modeling with data collected from managers in 271 manufacturing firms, they show that organizational learning plays a significant role in mediating the effects of IT competency on firm performance. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Campbell The Informant in Quantitative Research , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  E. Penrose,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[3]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[4]  J. Mee The synergistic effect , 1965 .

[5]  F. M. Scherer,et al.  Technology, Economic Growth and Public Policy. , 1967 .

[6]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Technology, Economic Growth and Public Policy. , 1968 .

[7]  James C. Taylor Technology and planned organizational change , 1971 .

[8]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology , 1974 .

[9]  L W Fry,et al.  Technology-structure research: three critical issues. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[10]  Paul T. Durbin,et al.  Philosophy and Technology , 1983 .

[11]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Environmental Boundary Spanning and Information Processing Effects on Organizational Performance , 1984 .

[12]  Nick Rackoff,et al.  SIM Competition Paper: Information Systems for Competitive Advantage: Implemenation of a Planning Process , 1985, MIS Q..

[13]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[14]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Information systems for sustainable competitive advantage , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[15]  T. Roehl,et al.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[16]  Gregory G. Dess Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: Competitors in a fragmented industry , 1987 .

[17]  N. Capon,et al.  Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment , 1987 .

[18]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[19]  M. Staten,et al.  Market share/market power revisited. A new test for an old theory. , 1988, Journal of health economics.

[20]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[21]  John R. Schroeter Estimating the Degree of Market Power in the Beef Packing Industry , 1988 .

[22]  Boon-Siong Neo,et al.  Factors facilitating the use of Information Technology for competitive advantage: An exploratory study , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[23]  W. R. Dillon,et al.  Some Results on the Behavior of Alternate Covariance Structure Estimation Procedures in the Presence of Non-Normal Data , 1989 .

[24]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[25]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .

[26]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[27]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Databases: Theory, Data, and Implications , 1990 .

[28]  Rashi Glazer Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset , 1991 .

[29]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Measuring the Potential Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Strategic Variables , 1991 .

[30]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences , 1991, MIS Q..

[31]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[32]  T. C. Powell Organizational alignment as competitive advantage , 1992 .

[33]  E. Berndt,et al.  High-tech capital formation and economic performance in U.S. manufacturing industries : an exploratory analysis , 1992 .

[34]  Thomas C. Powell,et al.  Research notes and communications strategic planning as competitive advantage , 1992 .

[35]  P. Attewell Information technology and the productivity paradox , 1993 .

[36]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An Exploratory Study , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Markor: A Measure of Market Orientation , 1993 .

[38]  S. Zahra,et al.  Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance , 1993 .

[39]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[40]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[41]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[42]  Jerry R. Goolsby,et al.  Behavioral and Psychological Consequences of Boundary Spanning Burnout for Customer Service Representatives , 1994 .

[43]  James M. Sinkula Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[44]  G. Day Continuous Learning about Markets , 1994 .

[45]  Frank Webster,et al.  What Information Society? , 1994, Inf. Soc..

[46]  K. Peffers,et al.  Rewards to Investors in Innovative Information Technology Applications: First Movers and Early Followers in ATMs , 1995 .

[47]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[48]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after , 1995 .

[49]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[50]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[51]  Albert S. Dexter,et al.  Added Value and Pricing with Information Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[52]  James Reardon,et al.  The effect of information technology on productivity in retailing , 1996 .

[53]  Thomas H. Brush PREDICTED CHANGE IN OPERATIONAL SYNERGY AND POST‐ACQUISITION PERFORMANCE OF ACQUIRED BUSINESSES , 1996 .

[54]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[55]  David Lei,et al.  Dynamic Core Competences through Meta-Learning and Strategic Context , 1996 .

[56]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[57]  D. Schendel,et al.  Notes from the editor‐in‐chief , 1996 .

[58]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Market Intelligence Dissemination across Functional Boundaries , 1996 .

[59]  D. Schendel,et al.  Editor's introduction to the 1996 Winter special issue: Knowledge and the firm , 1996 .

[60]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[61]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[62]  J. Lee Maier Rethinking Strategic Information Systems , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[63]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Environmental Scanning for Information Technology: An Empirical Investigation , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Bernard L. Simonin The Importance of Collaborative Know-How: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization , 1997 .

[65]  N. Smith,et al.  Ethics and Target Marketing: The Role of Product Harm and Consumer Vulnerability , 1997 .

[66]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom , 1997, CACM.

[67]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[68]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[69]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior , 1997 .

[70]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  An Organizational Memory Approach to Information Management , 1998 .

[71]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[72]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[73]  J. Sampler Redefining industry structure for the information age , 1998 .

[74]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[75]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[76]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance , 1999 .

[77]  櫻澤 仁 Resource-Based Perspectiveの検討:その現状・評価と将来展望 , 1999 .

[78]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[79]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  A Social Capital Theory of Career Success , 2001 .

[80]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[81]  Yiannis E. Spanos,et al.  An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective , 2001 .

[82]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment , 2001 .

[83]  Javier Zamora Bonilla,et al.  Ortega y Gasset , 2002 .