Evaluating Co-located Games as a Mediator for Children’s Collaborative Interaction

In this paper, we investigate different types of collaborative interaction that children in special education may engage in when playing co-located collaborative games. The work used a qualitative approach for studying three different games (2 digital, 1 boardgame) to understand how they provide opportunities for collaborative interaction to children (aged 12 years) in special education. To analyse the gameplay sessions, we used the three levels of collaborative interaction from Activity Theory (AT) as a frame of reference, and we combined this model with gameplay design patterns (GDPs) to express and encode the differences in collaborative interaction between and within the playtests. An important finding is that children do indeed display different levels of collaborative interaction. Furthermore, our paper demonstrates how the three levels of collaborative interaction as defined in AT combined with GDPs can be used to analyse and describe collaborative gameplay actions between children in special education, and it provides insight in a number of gameplay design elements that may support the occurrence of higher levels of collaborative interaction.

[1]  Leilah Lyons,et al.  DCLM framework: understanding collaboration in open-ended tabletop learning environments , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[2]  Eva Eriksson,et al.  StringForce: A Forced Collaborative Interaction Game for Special Education , 2017, IDC.

[3]  Katerina Ananiadou,et al.  21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41. , 2009 .

[4]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  Game Design Patterns for Collaborative Player Interactions , 2014, DiGRA.

[5]  Eva Eriksson,et al.  Using Gameplay Design Patterns with Children in the Redesign of a Collaborative Co-located Game , 2019, IDC.

[6]  Sara Price,et al.  Interfering and resolving: How tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[7]  Eva Eriksson,et al.  Using Gameplay Design Patterns to Support Children's Collaborative Interactions for Learning , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Gökçe Elif Baykal,et al.  Collaborative Technologies for Children with Special Needs: A Systematic Literature Review , 2020, CHI.

[9]  Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose,et al.  The Human–Artifact Model: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Artifact Ecologies , 2011, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[11]  Marion Shields,et al.  What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education: Using Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies , 2018, TEACH Journal of Christian Education.

[12]  Magy Seif El-Nasr,et al.  Understanding and evaluating cooperative games , 2010, CHI.

[13]  Katharina Emmerich,et al.  The Impact of Game Patterns on Player Experience and Social Interaction in Co-Located Multiplayer Games , 2017, CHI PLAY.

[14]  Mirko Gelsomini,et al.  Designing motion-based activities to engage students with autism in classroom settings , 2015, IDC.

[15]  Mark S. Hancock,et al.  To Asymmetry and Beyond!: Improving Social Connectedness by Increasing Designed Interdependence in Cooperative Play , 2019, CHI.

[16]  Juan Pablo Hourcade,et al.  Multitouch tablet applications and activities to enhance the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorders , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table , 2009, ITS '09.

[18]  James Mainwaring,et al.  Psychology in the classroom , 1956 .

[19]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[20]  Jacob E. Bardram.  Collaboration, Coordination and Computer Support: An Activity Theoretical Approach to the Design of Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Ph.D. Thesis , 1998 .

[21]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[22]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[23]  Katerina Ananiadou,et al.  21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries , 2009 .

[24]  Jochen Rick,et al.  Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games , 2006 .

[25]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  Evaluating a Collaborative iPad Game's Impact on Social Relationships for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2015, TACC.

[26]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications , 1995, EWHCI.

[27]  Rui Prada,et al.  Game Mechanics for Cooperative Games , 2008 .

[28]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[29]  Sus Lundgren,et al.  Exploring aesthetical gameplay design patterns: camaraderie in four games , 2010, MindTrek.

[30]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Staffan Björk,et al.  Patterns In Game Design , 2004 .

[32]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Collaboration in collaborative learning , 2015 .

[33]  John Woollard,et al.  Psychology for the Classroom: Constructivism and Social Learning , 2010 .

[34]  Massimo Zancanaro,et al.  Dimensions of collaboration on a tabletop interface for children with autism spectrum disorder , 2011, CHI.

[35]  Debbie Chalmers.  What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education (2nd edition) , 2014 .