Attention allocation to the right and left of a fixated word: Use of orthographic information from multiple words during reading

Eye movement contingent display changes were used to manipulate the information to the right of a fixated target in one experiment and to its right and left in a second experiment. Experiment 1 showed large increases in target viewing duration when orthographically illegal information was visible to the right of the target. Experiment 2 yielded smaller effects of orthographically illegal information in the parafovea on target viewing. Experiment 2 also showed that readers obtained useful information to the right of a fixated target irrespective of the type of information that was visible to the target's left. These results indicate that orthographic information is obtained from more than one word prior to saccade programming, and that the processing of orthographic information to the right and left of a fixated target is functionally independent.

[1]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Covert Attention and Eye Movements during Reading , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[3]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  The Influence of Parafoveal Words on Foveal Inspection Time: Evidence for a Processing Trade-Off , 1998 .

[5]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[6]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[7]  K. Rayner,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998 .

[8]  K. Rayner,et al.  Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: updating the E-Z Reader model to account for initial fixation locations and refixations , 2000 .

[10]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal Processing in Word Recognition , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  A. Inhoff,et al.  Chapter 2 – Definition and Computation of Oculomotor Measures in the Study of Cognitive Processes , 1998 .

[13]  J. Henderson,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[14]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Seth N. Greenberg,et al.  Allocation of Visuo-Spatial Attention and Saccade Programming During Reading , 2000 .

[17]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control , 1998, Vision Research.