Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Stream Restoration: Potential and Examples

Within stream restoration practice there has been little use of formal decision analysis methods for evaluating tradeoffs in selecting restoration sites and design alternatives. Restoration planning suffers from poorly defined objectives, confusion of objectives and means, and a lack of consideration of tradeoffs. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods have the potential to improve restoration decision making by quantifying non-economic objectives, communicating tradeoffs, facilitating consistent and explicit valuation, and focusing negotiation on ultimate objectives. To explore the potential usefulness of MCDA, we first review restoration practices and define the characteristics of projects that are good candidates for MCDA. We also present two case studies. The first study is a prioritization of stream reaches for restoration that illustrates how value judgments can affect such decisions. The second study addresses the proposed removal of the Ballville Dam on the Sandusky River in Ohio. An important challenge in the dam removal decision is the linking of habitat improvements to changes in species populations and ecological services that people value. The analysis shows how MCDA can assist decision making by clarifying tradeoffs, in this case by showing that the key issues are conflicts among ecological criteria—not all of which are improved by restoration.

[1]  Richard M. Anderson,et al.  Using Decision Analysis to Choose Phosphorus Targets for Lake Erie , 2001, Environmental management.

[2]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[3]  Curtis A. Brown,et al.  THE CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONTROL STUDY: A CASE FOR MULTIOBJECTIVE PLANNING AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT , 1984 .

[4]  Western Energy,et al.  Habitat suitability information: Walleye , 1984 .

[5]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Implications of current ecological thinking for biodiversity conservation: A review of the salient issues , 2005 .

[6]  M. Leclerc,et al.  NUMERICAL METHOD FOR MODELLING SPAWNING HABITAT DYNAMICS OF LANDLOCKED SALMON, SALMO SALAR , 1996 .

[7]  Katie A. Barnas,et al.  Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts , 2005, Science.

[8]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth's Ecosystems in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[9]  J. Evans,et al.  ASSESSMENT USING GIS AND SEDIMENT ROUTING OF THE PROPOSED REMOVAL OF BALLVILLE DAM, SANDUSKY RIVER, OHIO 1 , 2002 .

[10]  Tony Prato,et al.  Multiple-attribute evaluation of ecosystem management for the Missouri River system , 2003 .

[11]  Antonino Cancelliere,et al.  Case Study: Multicriteria Assessment of Drought Mitigation Measures , 2005 .

[12]  J. Cohn.  Resurrecting the Dammed: A Look at Colorado River Restoration , 2001 .

[13]  Joseph F. Koonce,et al.  The Sea Lamprey in Lake Erie: a Case History , 2003 .

[14]  S. Zionts,et al.  Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting: Constraint Proposal Methods , 1999 .

[15]  A. Bednarek.  Undamming Rivers: A Review of the Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal , 2001, Environmental management.

[16]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Multicriteria Bayesian Analysis of Lower Trophic Level Uncertainties and Value of Research in Lake Erie , 2003 .

[17]  Gamini Herath,et al.  Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2006 .

[18]  J. Kelso,et al.  Benefits from incremental additions to walleye spawning habitat in the Current River, with reference to habitat modification as a walleye management tool in Ontario , 1996 .

[19]  J. Koonce,et al.  An Economic Injury Level Approach to Establishing the Intensity of Sea Lamprey Control in the Great Lakes , 1993 .

[20]  R. Walter,et al.  Comparison of Walleye Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) Information with Habitat Features of a Walleye Spawning Stream , 2001 .

[21]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[22]  Ronald C. Baird.  On Sustainability, Estuaries, and Ecosystem Restoration: The Art of the Practical , 2005 .

[23]  P. J. Whiting,et al.  Factors Affecting Accuracy of Stream Channel Slope Estimates Derived from Geographical Information Systems , 2008 .

[24]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Using a Bayesian Approach to Quantify Scale Compatibility Bias , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Choosing how to choose: Comparing amalgamation methods for environmental impact assessment , 1985 .

[26]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Negotiation in Social Conflict , 1993 .

[27]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Energy Decisions and the Environment , 2000 .

[28]  R. Hobbs.  Restoration ecology: the challenge of social values and expectations , 2004 .

[29]  Nick Otting,et al.  An Ecological Perspective of Riparian and Stream Restoration in the Western United States , 1997 .

[30]  Timothy C. Granata,et al.  GIS-based modeling of spawning habitat suitability for walleye in the Sandusky River, Ohio, and implications for dam removal and river restoration , 2006 .

[31]  Robert H. Webb,et al.  Science and Values in River Restoration in the Grand Canyon There is no restoration or rehabilitation strategy that will improve the status of every riverine resource , 1998 .

[32]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[33]  G. Gulis,et al.  Workgroup Report: Drinking-Water Nitrate and Health—Recent Findings and Research Needs , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  J. Stockwell,et al.  Does the value of newly accessible spawning habitat for walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) depend on its location relative to nursery habitats , 2003 .

[35]  T. Granata,et al.  Modelling the effects of dam removal on migratory walleye (Sander vitreus) early life‐history stages , 2006 .

[36]  H. Raiffa.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[37]  I. Linkov,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Comprehensive Decision Approach for Management of Contaminated Sediments , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[38]  E. Marschall,et al.  RIVER DISCHARGE DRIVES SURVIVAL OF LARVAL WALLEYE , 1998 .

[39]  J. Stanford,et al.  Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation , 1995 .