Performance of staged and non-staged up-flow anaerobic sludge bed (USSB and UASB) reactors treating low strength complex wastewater

The use of anaerobic processes to treat low-strength wastewater has been increasing in recent years due to their favourable performance-costs balance. For optimal results, it is necessary to identify reactor configurations that are best suited for this kind of application. This paper reports on the comparative study carried out with two high-rate anaerobic reactor systems with the objective of evaluating their performances when used for the treatment of low-strength, complex wastewater. One of the systems is the commonly used up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. The other is the up-flow staged sludge bed (USSB) system in which the reactor was divided longitudinally into 3, 5 and 7 compartments by the use of baffles. The reactors (9 l) were fed with a synthetic, soluble and colloidal waste (chemical oxygen demand (COD) < 1000 mg/l) and operated at 28°C and 24 h hydraulic retention time. Intermediate flow hydraulics, between plug-flow and completely-mixed, in the UASB and 7 stages USSB reactors allowed efficient degradation of substrates with minimum effluent concentrations. Low number of compartments in the USSB reactors increased the levels of short-circuiting thus reducing substrate removal efficiencies. All reactors showed high COD removal efficiencies (93–98%) and thus can be regarded as suitable for the treatment of low strength, complex wastewater. Staged anaerobic reactors can be a good alternative for this kind of application provided they are fitted with a large enough (≥7) number of compartments to fully take advantage of their strengths. Scale factors seem to have influenced importantly on the comparison between one and multi staged sludge-bed reactors and, therefore, observations made here could change at larger reactor volumes.

[1]  B Lew,et al.  Temperature effect on UASB reactor operation for domestic wastewater treatment in temperate climate regions. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Robert F. Hickey,et al.  Monitoring of the anaerobic methane fermentation process , 1990 .

[3]  C. F. Forster,et al.  Domestic wastewater treatment using a UASB reactor , 1997 .

[4]  D J Batstone,et al.  Hydraulics of laboratory and full-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater seventh edition , 2013 .

[6]  Thiruvenkatachari Viraraghavan,et al.  Start-up and operation of UASB reactors at 20°C for municipal wastewater treatment , 1998 .

[7]  G. G. Gopala Krishna,et al.  Treatment of low-strength soluble wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  D. Stuckey,et al.  Treatment of dilute soluble and colloidal wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor: influence of hydraulic retention time , 2000 .

[9]  Gatze Lettinga,et al.  Effect of staging on volatile fatty acid degradation in a sulfidogenic granular sludge reactor. , 1998 .

[10]  Gatze Lettinga,et al.  UASB Process design for various types of wastewaters. , 1991 .

[11]  H. Harada,et al.  Treatment of Wastewater Containing a Large Amount of Suspended Solids by a Novel Multi-Staged UASB Reactor , 2005, Environmental technology.

[12]  E Foresti,et al.  Perspectives on anaerobic treatment in developing countries. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  Richard E. Speece,et al.  Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters , 1996 .

[14]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Technical Feasibility of the Treatment of Domestic Wastewater by a CEPS-UASB System , 2000 .

[15]  O. Levenspiel Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1972 .

[16]  T. Viraraghavan,et al.  Low-strength wastewater treatment by a UASB reactor , 1996 .

[17]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  A REVIEW: THE ANAEROBIC TREATMENT OF SEWAGE IN UASB AND EGSB REACTORS , 1998 .

[18]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Development of anaerobic sludge bed (ASB) reactor technologies for domestic wastewater treatment: motives and perspectives , 1999 .

[19]  Pramod Kumar,et al.  Treatment of low strength complex wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[20]  J. Akunna,et al.  Comparing the performance of UASB and GRABBR treating low strength wastewaters. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  David C. Stuckey,et al.  TREATMENT OF DILUTE WASTEWATER USING AN ANAEROBIC BAFFLED REACTOR: EFFECT OF LOW TEMPERATURE , 2000 .

[22]  W. Wiegant Experiences and potential of anaerobic wastewater treatment in tropical regions. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[23]  Gatze Lettinga,et al.  High rate thermophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment in compartmentalized upflow reactors , 1994 .

[24]  R. A. Barbosa,et al.  Treatment of raw domestic sewage in an UASB reactor , 1989 .

[25]  M. Veiga,et al.  Performance of and biomass characterisation in a UASB reactor treating domestic waste water at ambient temperature , 1998 .

[26]  S. R. Jenkins,et al.  Measuring anaerobic sludge digestion and growth by a simple alkalimetric titration , 1983 .