Discriminating cropping systems and agro-environmental measures by remote sensing

The agrarian policy of the European Union tends to support sustainable agriculture, subsidising only cropping systems that are implemented with specific agro-environmental measures. These actions require a precise follow-up of the crops and of the agricultural practices over a large surface. To that end, remote-sensing techniques are unique and cost-effective. We developed here a digital land cover classification in the Mediterranean dryland, mapping and assessing the main cropping systems and some agro-environmental measures such as cover crops in olive orchards and crop stubble for reducing soil erosion. We analysed a high spatial resolution satellite image (QuickBird) taken in early summer around Montilla, southern Spain. Images of the four broad wavebands, six band ratios and three vegetation indices were extracted from the satellite image and studied for the discrimination of nine land covers. The classified regions were determined by applying adequate boundary digital values to the selected images. Our results show that the land covers were discriminated with an overall accuracy of about 90%. Images of the normalised difference vegetation index and the ratio vegetation index discriminated between vegetation and non-vegetation zones. The visible wavebands discriminated roadside trees and herbaceous crops, and the near-infrared waveband highways and urban soil plus bare soil. The ratios blue/green and red/green were useful for distinguishing non-burnt stubble. The burnt stubble area was discriminated through the adapted burnt area index. Olive orchards were classified once the regions of vegetation, non-vegetation and non-burnt stubble were extracted. This technology will be a useful tool of agroecology control for the administration and will be a substitute for the current follow-up of cropping systems by ground visits. It can also be used on a farm level in order to help farmers and technicians to make decisions about the management of sustainable agricultural practices.

[1]  C. Jordan.  Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor , 1969 .

[2]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[3]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[4]  A. Huete.  A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[5]  R. Jackson,et al.  Interpreting vegetation indices , 1991 .

[6]  James H. Everitt,et al.  Using Satellite Data to Map False Broomweed (Ericameria austrotexana) Infestations on South Texas Rangelands , 1993, Weed Technology.

[7]  C. Justice,et al.  Development of vegetation and soil indices for MODIS-EOS , 1994 .

[8]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment: Fundamental Principles , 1998 .

[9]  Lamb,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of mapping weeds in fallow fields using airborne digital imaging: Panicumeffusum in oilseed rape stubble , 1998 .

[10]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  Coordinating methodologies for scaling landcover classifications from site-specific to global: Steps toward validating global map products , 1999 .

[11]  D. Lobell,et al.  Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: precision and accuracy of spectral mixture analysis and the normalized difference vegetation index. , 2000 .

[12]  M. Flowers,et al.  Remote Sensing of Winter Wheat Tiller Density for Early Nitrogen Application Decisions , 2001 .

[13]  W. Cohen,et al.  Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal Thematic Mapper data , 2001 .

[14]  E. Chuvieco,et al.  Assessment of different spectral indices in the red-near-infrared spectral domain for burned land discrimination , 2002 .

[15]  WARWICK L. FELTON,et al.  Using Reflectance Sensors in Agronomy and Weed Science1 , 2002, Weed Technology.

[16]  S. Ustin,et al.  Mapping nonnative plants using hyperspectral imagery , 2003 .

[17]  Alexander Siegmund,et al.  Automatic land cover analysis for Tenerife by supervised classification using remotely sensed data , 2003 .

[18]  Alfonso Calera,et al.  Monitoring irrigation water use by combining Irrigation Advisory Service, and remotely sensed data with a geographic information system , 2003 .

[19]  Francisca López-Granados,et al.  Assessing land-use in olive groves from aerial photographs , 2004 .

[20]  Roger M. McCoy,et al.  Field Methods in Remote Sensing , 2004 .

[21]  L. Tian,et al.  A Review on Remote Sensing of Weeds in Agriculture , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[22]  Jiaguo Qi,et al.  Optimal classification methods for mapping agricultural tillage practices , 2004 .

[23]  G. M. Casady,et al.  Detection of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Using Multidate High-Resolution Satellite Imagery1 , 2005, Weed Technology.

[24]  Field Methods in Remote Sensing edited by Roger M. McCoy , 2006 .

[25]  Y. L. Everingham,et al.  Advanced satellite imagery to classify sugarcane crop characteristics , 2007, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.