Information Systems Development (ISD) in Complex Settings as Interlocking Spirals of Sense-Making

This paper assesses a research framework against the findings of a field research study. The framework employs the metaphor of a triple spiral as a means by which Weick’s sense-making concepts can be applied to ISD activities. The study examines the experiences of members of a large manufacturing organisation in a multinational company. Study participants included project teams members, consultants and senior management. This research is ongoing and other organisations are being engaged in the study. Results suggest that the framework is applicable to the ISD activity and could be used to encourage broad-based research in ISD i.e. research that brings together and understands the relationship between the IS as a social artefact and its complex organisational context. The results support the notion that the framework aids the understanding and management of change at micro-and macro-levels within organisations.

[1]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[2]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Research on the management of innovation : the Minnesota studies , 1991 .

[3]  M R Louis,et al.  Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.

[4]  M.J. Bickerton,et al.  The classification of requirements engineering methods , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[5]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[6]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Crisis and Foundation: An Inquiry Into the Nature and Limits of Models and Methods in the IS Discipline , 1997, ECIS.

[7]  David Chenho Kung,et al.  Information Systems Engineering , 1993, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Variations in users' definitions of an information system , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Rationality concepts in information system development methodologies , 1991 .

[10]  R. Boland,et al.  The experience of system design: A hermeneutic of organizational action☆ , 1989 .

[11]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations , 1994 .

[12]  J. March.  Ambiguity and accounting: The elusive link between information and decision making☆ , 1987 .

[13]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[14]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[15]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Executives’ Perceptual Filters: What They Notice and How They Make Sense , 1988 .

[16]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  Software Requirements: Objects, Functions and States , 1993 .

[17]  Frank Lentricchia,et al.  Critical terms for literary study , 1989 .

[18]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor and Magic , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Petruska Clarkson.  Change in Organisations , 1995 .

[21]  Vesa Torvinen,et al.  Problem Formulation in is Development Methodologies: Towards A Constructive View Through A Deconstructive Approach , 1997, ECIS.

[22]  Robert H. Waterman,et al.  Adhocracy: The Power to Change , 1990 .

[23]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[24]  Deepak Khazanchi,et al.  A new approach to problem definition : using information objects , 1995 .

[25]  Information technology in support of individual decision‐making , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Robert Moreton,et al.  Transforming the organization: the contribution of the information systems function , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Ian M. Graham.  Object-oriented methods , 1991 .