Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology the Relationship between Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Information Quality, and Intention to Use E-government

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore and investigate empirically the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived information quality, and intention to use egovernment to gather information and conduct transactions by Jordanian citizens. MotivationsThe motivations for conducting this study are: this work has never been done in the Jordanian e-government context; there is a significant part of e-government literature that investigates various factors that determine intention to use e-government in developed countries, however, there is a dearth of studies that investigate intention to use e-government for gathering information and conducting transactions in developing countries; and finally, it is an empirical research where important findings emerge and as a result, relevant managerial implications are provided. Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire survey was developed based on the related literature. The original version of the questionnaire was in English then translated into Arabic. The questionnaire was circulated to a selected sample of Jordanian citizens who are aware of e-government services. FindingsThe results of data analysis have revealed that Jordanian citizens perceive that e-government system is useful, easy to use, and to some extent has a high level of information quality. The results have also showed that there is a significant positive relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived information quality and intention to use egovernment for gathering information and conducting transactions. Finally, the results suggest that citizens’ gender and level of education make some differences in terms of using e-government for gathering information rather than for conducting transactions. Research limitationsThis research has not taken into consideration all the contextual factors that may determine intention to use e-government for gathering information or conducting transactions. Also, it did not take into account the possibility of any intervening, mediating, and moderating variables that may strengthen the hypothesized relationships in the research model. Practical implicationsAs this research focuses on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived information quality and tries to link those with intention to use, as result; it will encourage the use of e-government for gathering information and conducting transactions. It also raises the policy and decision makers’ awareness of how Jordanian citizens are going to use e-government services. Finally, it gives e-government project national team an idea of how to design e-government strategy according to citizens’ needs.

[1]  T. K. Bandopadhyaya,et al.  Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology , 2022 .

[2]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[3]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[4]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[5]  Carolyn A. Lin,et al.  Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico , 2008 .

[6]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[7]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Factors for Successful e‑Government Adoption: a Conceptual Framework , 2007 .

[10]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[11]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e‐government , 2004 .

[12]  Sivaporn Wangpipatwong,et al.  Understanding Citizen’s Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-Efficacy , 2008 .

[13]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trust and Risk in eGovernment Adoption , 2008, AMCIS.

[14]  Margôt Kuttschreuter,et al.  Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[16]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Resistance and support to electronic government, building a model of innovation , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Ramessur Taruna Shalini,et al.  Are Mauritians ready for e-Government services? , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Samer Ibrahim Mofleh,et al.  Understanding Factors Influencing Citizens’ Adoption of e-Government Services in the Developing World: Jordan as a Case Study , 2008 .

[21]  Z. Al-adawi CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF CITIZEN ADOPTION OF E-GOVERNMENT , 2005 .

[22]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  Hussein Al-Omari,et al.  E-Government Architecture In Jordan: A Comparative Analysis , 2006 .

[24]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Ahmed Al-Omari,et al.  E-Government Readiness Assessment Model , 2006 .

[28]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Gino Verleye,et al.  User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..