Local Ugandan Production of Stable 0.2% Chlorhexidine Eye Drops

Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop a protocol to prepare buffered chlorhexidine (CHX) eye drops (0.2% w/v) in the United Kingdom that can be reproduced at a production facility in Uganda. Buffered CHX eye drops can prevent CHX degradation and improve ocular tolerability during the treatment of fungal keratitis. Methods Buffered CHX eye drops in amber glass containers were prepared using sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.90 to 6.75. Two commercial CHX solutions and CHX in water were used as controls. Eye drops were stored at 40°C (70% humidity, 21 months) in the United Kingdom and at ambient temperature in Uganda (30 months). High-performance liquid chromatography was used to determine CHX stability over time, and pH was monitored. Sterility was achieved using an autoclave (121°C, 15 minutes) and water bath (100°C, 30 minutes). Results The pH of acetate-buffered CHX eye drops did not change over 21 months at 40°C or at ambient temperature (30 months), whereas the pH of the unbuffered aqueous CHX displayed significant fluctuations, with an increase in acidity. The CHX concentration remained the same in both buffered and unbuffered eye-drop solutions. Eye drops sterilization was successful using an autoclave and a water bath. Conclusions Stable, sterile, buffered CHX eye drops (pH 6.75) were successfully prepared first in the United Kingdom and then reproducibly in Uganda. This eye drops can be prepared in a hospital or pharmacy setting with limited resources, thus providing a cost-effective treatment for fungal keratitis. Translational Relevance A protocol has been developed to prepare buffered CHX eye drops in low- and middle-income countries to treat fungal keratitis.

[1]  M. Burton,et al.  Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% as a treatment for recalcitrant fungal keratitis in Uganda: a pilot study , 2021, BMJ Open Ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Burton,et al.  The global incidence and diagnosis of fungal keratitis. , 2020, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[3]  H. Weiss,et al.  Topical chlorhexidine 0.2% versus topical natamycin 5% for fungal keratitis in Nepal: rationale and design of a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial , 2020, BMJ Open.

[4]  N. Mwangi,et al.  Medication error affecting newborns' sight: a national response , 2019, Community eye health.

[5]  Chlorhexidine , 2018, Reactions Weekly.

[6]  H. Worthington,et al.  Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  Kabir,et al.  Quality Control Tests for Ophthalmic Pharmaceuticals: Pharmacopoeial Standards and Specifications , 2017 .

[8]  S. Tuft,et al.  Altered Patterns of Fungal Keratitis at a London Ophthalmic Referral Hospital: An Eight-Year Retrospective Observational Study , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Soni Kottayi,et al.  Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Chlorhexidine, Coconut Oil, Probiotics, and Ketoconazole on Candida albicans Isolated in Children with Early Childhood Caries: An In Vitro Study , 2016, Scientifica.

[10]  B. Vote,et al.  Aqueous chlorhexidine (0.1%) is an effective alternative to povidone–iodine for intravitreal injection prophylaxis , 2016, Acta ophthalmologica.

[11]  Li-Jiuan Shen,et al.  Formulation and stability of an extemporaneous 0.02% chlorhexidine digluconate ophthalmic solution. , 2015, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[12]  Jennifer R. Evans,et al.  Medical interventions for fungal keratitis. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  M. Cowie National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. , 2015, European heart journal.

[14]  J. Shimazaki,et al.  Ocular Surface Reconstruction After Exposure to High Concentrations of Antiseptic Solutions , 2012, Cornea.

[15]  S. Kilvington,et al.  Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  H. Sriplung,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of chlorhexidine in the maintenance of oral candidiasis-free period in HIV infection. , 2008, Oral diseases.

[17]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Mycotic keratitis: Susceptibility to antiseptic agents , 1995, International Ophthalmology.

[18]  T. Høy,et al.  Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use CVMP assessment report for type II variation for Panacur , 2004 .

[19]  P. Suci,et al.  Action of Chlorhexidine Digluconate against Yeast and Filamentous Forms in an Early-Stage Candida albicans Biofilm , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[20]  A. Kramer,et al.  Antiseptic prophylaxis and therapy in ocular infections: principles, clinical practice and infection control. , 2002 .

[21]  L. Samaranayake,et al.  Adjunctive use of chlorhexidine in oral candidoses: a review. , 2001, Oral diseases.

[22]  G. Visvesvara,et al.  Treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis with chlorhexidine. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[23]  G. Pizzo,et al.  Antifungal activity of chlorhexidine containing mouthrinses. An in vitro study. , 1998, Minerva Stomatologica.

[24]  G. Johnson,et al.  Randomised trial of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 2.5% natamycin for fungal keratitis in Bangladesh , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  G. Johnson,et al.  Trial of chlorhexidine gluconate for fungal corneal ulcers. , 1997, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[26]  E. Tabor,et al.  Corneal damage due to eye contact with chlorhexidine gluconate. , 1989, JAMA.

[27]  K. Purdy Aspects of chlorhexidine degradation , 1987 .

[28]  M. Osato,et al.  Experimental evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate for ocular antisepsis , 1984, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[29]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.