An approach to address probabilistic assumptions on the availability of safety systems for deterministic safety analysis

Abstract There is an attempt nowadays to provide a more comprehensive and realistic safety assessment of design and operation of Nuclear Power Plants. In this context, innovative approaches are being proposed for safety assessment of nuclear power plants design including both design basis conditions and design extension conditions. An area of research aims at developing methods for combining insights from probabilistic and deterministic safety analyses in Option 4, also called realistic approach, from the International Atomic Energy Agency specific safety guide. The development of Option 4 or realistic approach involves the adoption of best estimate computer codes, best estimate assumptions on systems availability and best estimate of initial and boundary conditions for the safety analysis. This paper focusses on providing the fundamentals and practical implementation of an approach to integrate PSA-based probabilistic models and data, which incorporate best estimate assumptions on the availability of safety systems, into Option 4. It is presented a practical approach to identify relevant, i.e. most probable, configurations of safety systems and to assess the associated occurrence probability of each configuration using PSA models and data of a NPP, which is based on the use of a Pure Monte Carlo method. An example of application is provided to demonstrate how this approach performs. The case study focusses on an accident scenario corresponding to the initiating event “Loss Of Feed Water (LOFW)” for a typical three-loops Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) NPP.

[1]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Methodology for the use of experimental data to enhance model output uncertainty assessment in thermal hydraulics codes , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Sofía Carlos,et al.  A procedure to develop the EBEPU methodology merging PSA-based assumptions and BEPU method , 2015 .

[3]  Hongbin Zhang,et al.  Best estimate plus uncertainty analysis of departure from nucleate boiling limiting case with CASL core simulator VERA-CS in response to PWR main steam line break event , 2016 .

[4]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  The Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) approach in licensing of current nuclear reactors , 2012 .

[5]  Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad,et al.  Thermal–hydraulics system codes uncertainty assessment: A review of the methodologies , 2009 .

[6]  F. Pelayo,et al.  Combining Insights from Probabilistic and Deterministic Safety Analyses in Option 4 from the IAEA Specific Safety Guide SSG-2 , 2014 .

[7]  César Queral,et al.  Analysis of cold leg LOCA with failed HPSI by means of integrated safety assessment methodology , 2014 .

[8]  François M. Hemez,et al.  Improved best estimate plus uncertainty methodology, including advanced validation concepts, to license evolving nuclear reactors , 2011 .

[9]  L. L. Briggs,et al.  Uncertainty quantification approaches for advanced reactor analyses. , 2009 .

[10]  César Queral,et al.  AP1000® Large-Break LOCA BEPU analysis with TRACE code , 2015 .

[11]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety assessment: Concepts, challenges, research directions , 2014 .

[12]  Gary E. Wilson,et al.  Historical insights in the development of Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty safety analysis , 2013 .

[13]  Soon Heung Chang,et al.  A combined deterministic and probabilistic procedure for safety assessment of beyond design basis accidents in nuclear power plant: Application to ECCS performance assessment for design basis LOCA redefinition , 2013 .

[14]  Sebastian Martorell,et al.  A comparison between traditional BEPU and Extended-BEPU approaches for deterministic safety analysis on nuclear power plants , 2016 .