Three new metrics to measure the convergence of metaheuristics towards the Pareto frontier and the aesthetic of a set of solutions in biobjective optimization
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Kalyanmoy Deb,et al. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.
[2] Kalyanmoy Deb,et al. Controlled Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithms for Better Convergence , 2001, EMO.
[3] Gary B. Lamont,et al. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analyses, and new innovations , 1999 .
[4] P. Siarry,et al. A systematic comparison of performance of various multiple objective metaheuristics using a common set of analytical test functions , 2000 .
[5] J. Dennis,et al. A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems , 1997 .
[6] Lothar Thiele,et al. Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.
[7] Sadiq M. Sait,et al. Iterative computer algorithms with applications in engineering - solving combinatorial optimization problems , 2000 .
[8] Jason R. Schott. Fault Tolerant Design Using Single and Multicriteria Genetic Algorithm Optimization. , 1995 .
[9] Glynn J. Sundararaj,et al. Ability of Objective Functions to Generate Points on Nonconvex Pareto Frontiers , 2000 .
[10] R. L. Keeney,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.