This way, please: Uncovering the directional effects of attribute translations on decision making

The translation of choice attributes into more meaningful information (e.g., from kWh to costs) is a form of choice architecture that is thought to facilitate decision making by providing decision signposts that activate personally relevant but latent objectives and guide decisions towards options that are most congruent with the activated objectives. Here, we investigated the psychological mechanisms that underlie and drive the directional effects of attribute translations on decision making. Across two choice experiments (total N = 973), we provide empirical support for our proposition that attribute translations operate via pre-decisional attention processes. Specifically, we demonstrate that attribute translations focus individuals’ attention on choice options that are most congruent with the concerns highlighted by translations, and that this attentional prioritization of alternatives predicts choice. In addition to the cognitive mechanisms underlying attribute translations, we highlight the choice architectural principles that moderate the effectiveness of translations. We show that the directional effects of attribute translations are driven by the information that translations provide rather than by contextual changes in the decision environment. In line with previous research on evaluability, we find the effectiveness of attribute translations to depend on information format, with translations conveying evaluative information having a larger impact on decision making than translations providing numerical information. The present study is among the first to investigate the decision making processes underlying a choice architectural intervention. It provides insights into the mechanisms that drive and facilitate the signpost effect and renders recommendations for the implementation of attribute translations in policy making.

[1]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Word count: 3998 Corresponding author: , 2022 .

[2]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[4]  Christian Balkenius,et al.  Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Numeric and graphic risk information processing of high and low numerates in the intuitive and deliberative decision modes: An eye-tracker study , 2014, Judgment and Decision Making.

[6]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[7]  Max Vetter,et al.  A Review and Taxonomy of Choice Architecture Techniques , 2016 .

[8]  J. Haushofer,et al.  Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand , 2017, American Economic Review.

[9]  Adrian R. Camilleri,et al.  Nudges and signposts: The effect of smart defaults and pictographic risk information on retirement saving investment choices , 2019, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.

[10]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  The Effect of Life Cycle Cost Information on Consumer Investment Decisions Regarding Eco‐Innovation , 2009 .

[11]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[12]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives , 1992 .

[13]  A. Rangel,et al.  Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[14]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[15]  E. Papies,et al.  Goal priming and eating behavior: enhancing self-regulation by environmental cues. , 2010, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[16]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[17]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[18]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[20]  Christopher K. Hsee.  Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options , 1998 .

[21]  J. Alba,et al.  The Effects of Frequency Knowledge On Consumer Decision Making , 1987 .

[22]  Bernd Weber,et al.  Salient nutrition labels increase the integration of health attributes in food decision-making , 2016, Judgment and Decision Making.

[23]  Lim M. Leong,et al.  The Role of Inference in Attribute Framing Effects , 2017 .

[24]  Stacey R. Finkelstein,et al.  Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults , 2006, Psychological science.

[25]  Tobias Brosch,et al.  Beyond Fear , 2008, Psychological science.

[26]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Translated Attributes as Choice Architecture: Aligning Objectives and Choices Through Decision Signposts , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Carl Newton Rexroad,et al.  Attention and choice. , 1929 .

[28]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  General Evaluability Theory , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[29]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? , 1994 .

[30]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis , 2014 .

[31]  Arie W Kruglanski,et al.  When opportunity knocks: bottom-up priming of goals by means and its effects on self-regulation. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Joseph W. Kable,et al.  Preference Reversals in Decision Making Under Risk are Accompanied by Changes in Attention to Different Attributes , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[33]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[34]  Jonathan D. Nelson,et al.  What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  N. Feather.  Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. , 1995 .

[36]  I. Hooge,et al.  Goal-directed visual attention drives health goal priming: An eye-tracking experiment , 2016, Appetite.

[37]  Chris Arney.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[38]  D. Hausman,et al.  Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge* , 2010 .

[39]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[40]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Six of One, Half Dozen of the Other , 2009, Psychological science.

[41]  Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck,et al.  A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods for Decision Research. A Critical Review and User's Guide , 2011 .

[42]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[43]  Hans Spada,et al.  What is green worth to you? Activating environmental values lowers price sensitivity towards electric vehicles , 2014 .

[44]  I. Krajbich,et al.  Attention and Choice Across Domains , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  P. Slovic.  The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[46]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Process-Tracing Methods in Decision Making: On Growing Up in the 70s , 2017 .

[49]  Ulf Bockenholt,et al.  Choice by Value Encoding and Value Construction: Processes of Loss Aversion , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck,et al.  Inducing Thought Processes: Bringing Process Measures and Cognitive Processes Closer Together , 2017 .

[51]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Adrian R. Camilleri,et al.  Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[53]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Majority Rule in Individual Decision Making , 2006 .

[54]  Ann Wolverton,et al.  Energy-Efficiency Gap* , 2013 .

[55]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[56]  Adrian R. Camilleri,et al.  Metric and Scale Design as Choice Architecture Tools , 2014 .

[57]  G. Maio,et al.  Changing, priming, and acting on values: effects via motivational relations in a circular model. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  The Decision Value Computations in the vmPFC and Striatum Use a Relative Value Code That is Guided by Visual Attention , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  D. Moore,et al.  Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[62]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[63]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Mindful judgment and decision making. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[64]  Jonathan Mummolo,et al.  Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment , 2018, American Political Science Review.

[65]  Ian Krajbich,et al.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[66]  H. Montgomery,et al.  A think aloud study of dominance structuring in decision processes , 1989 .

[67]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[68]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture , 2012 .

[69]  C. F. Anderson,et al.  Majority rule. , 2007, Texas dental journal.

[70]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Caveats on a process-tracing measure and a remedy , 1994 .

[71]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Communicating Statistical Information , 2000, Science.

[72]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[73]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  A Dirty Word or a Dirty World? , 2010, Psychological science.

[74]  Mario Pandelaere,et al.  How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger: The Unit Effect in Option Comparisons , 2011 .

[75]  R. Thaler,et al.  Choice Architecture , 2010 .

[76]  Martijn C. Willemsen,et al.  (Re)visiting the decision factory: observing cognition with MouselabWEB , 2019 .

[77]  R. Newell,et al.  EXPLAINING THE ENERGY PARADOX ‡ Deconstructing the Energy-Efficiency Gap: Conceptual Frameworks and Evidence † , 2015 .

[78]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[79]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Easy does it: The role of fluency in cue weighting , 2007 .

[80]  Paul Slovic,et al.  From Shakespeare to Simon: speculations--and some evidence-- about man's ability to process information , 1972 .

[81]  K. Carlson,et al.  Leader-Focused Search: The Impact of an Emerging Preference on Information Search , 2011 .

[82]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Prospect Theory Reflects Selective Allocation of Attention , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[83]  Craig R. M. McKenzie,et al.  Information leakage from logically equivalent frames , 2006, Cognition.

[84]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[85]  Aradhna Krishna,et al.  The Skeptical Shopper: A Metacognitive Account for the Effects of Default Options on Choice , 2004 .