The presence of regional accents in electrolarynx speech and the resultant effect on overall intelligibility

In this paper, a phonological analysis of a section of results from an online perceptual intelligibility test was performed which compared speech produced using a novel hands-free electrolarynx and a commercially available electrolarynx. A portion of the test consisted of a closed-set format containing a selection of four sets of four random CVC audio samples (recorded by two speakers - 1 male, 1 female - using the Servox™ and the hands-free pager motor design). Each survey participant was requested to listen to every recording and then choose the word they thought most closely resembled the recording in which they heard. The phenomenon referred to as Irish-English, as documented by Hickey [1], highlights the historical development of the English language and how its pronunciation currently varies throughout the country. The two speakers used in the intelligibility test originated from two phonologically contrasting regions – a male from the East and a female from the West. These differences are analysed with the aid of findings by Hickey and assessed as to whether they could potentially improve or hinder the intelligibility of an utterance.

[1]  James B. Kobler,et al.  Development of sound source components for a new electrolarynx speech prosthesis , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[2]  W. Hong,et al.  Functional outcomes following treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer. Part I--Voice preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. Part II--Laryngectomy rehabilitation: the state of the art in the VA System. Research Speech-Language Pathologists. Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Gr , 1998, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[3]  Sridha Sridharan,et al.  Application of noise reduction techniques for alaryngeal speech enhancement , 1997, TENCON '97 Brisbane - Australia. Proceedings of IEEE TENCON '97. IEEE Region 10 Annual Conference. Speech and Image Technologies for Computing and Telecommunications (Cat. No.97CH36162).

[4]  T H Crystal,et al.  Segmental durations in connected speech signals: preliminary results. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. Heinz,et al.  Acoustical and perceptual characteristics of speech produced with an electronic artificial larynx. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J. P. Egan Articulation testing methods , 1948, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  H. R. Konrad,et al.  Laryngectomy: postsurgical rehabilitation of communication. , 1976, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Carol Y. Espy-Wilson,et al.  Improvement of electrolaryngeal speech by introducing normal excitation information , 1999, EUROSPEECH.

[9]  J. Hoit,et al.  Cognitive-linguistic demands and speech breathing. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  A. Chaghajerdi,et al.  Neural-based prosthesis for enhanced voice intelligibility in laryngectomees , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[11]  Hanjun Liu,et al.  Enhancement of electrolarynx speech based on auditory masking , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Tohru Ifukube,et al.  Design of a new electrolarynx having a pitch control function , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.

[13]  M S Weiss,et al.  Electrolaryngeal speech produced by laryngectomized subjects: perceptual characteristics. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  Mark Nolan,et al.  Intelligibility of Electrolarynx Speech using a Novel Hands-free Actuator , 2011, BIOSIGNALS.

[15]  Eugene Coyle,et al.  Intelligibility of electrolarynx speech using a novel actuator , 2010 .