Background. A number of recent high-profile cases have focused attention on scientific misconduct and other problematic issues with the peer review process. The retraction of journal publications is an important part of the scientific publishing process that serves to remove flawed articles, (including, but not limited to, fraudulent results), from the literature. To date there have been few formal studies of journal retractions in the area of oncology. Methods. This article outlines the results of a bibliometric study of journal retractions from 1983 to 2018. Results. Analysis shows that article lifetime – that is the time period from initial publication to ultimate retraction – has decreased in recent years. It also shows that retraction rate has also increased over the same period. The causes and context of these trends are discussed and reference made to the dangers of scientific misconduct in oncology.
[1]
M. Ghert,et al.
Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey
,
2017,
Research Integrity and Peer Review.
[2]
Bruno Blais,et al.
Citation analysis of scientific categories
,
2017,
Heliyon.
[3]
O. Dyer.
Researcher suing PubPeer was found culpable of misconduct, court documents show
,
2016,
British Medical Journal.
[4]
G. Bouche,et al.
Inconsistencies and questionable reliability of the publication “Immunotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer with vitamin D-binding protein-derived macrophages-activating, GcMAF” by Yamamoto et al
,
2014,
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.