Three-dimensional united biased proportional navigation law for interception of maneuvering targets with angular constraint

Studying a guidance law, which can intercepts not only high-speed targets, but also low-speed targets with impact angle constrains, is a challenging task. In this paper, a new guidance law called united biased proportional navigation (UBPN) is proposed. The guidance law uses time-varying bias and navigation ratio, and incorporates the advantages of head-on and head-pursuit engagement. UBPN with positive time-varying navigation ratio can intercept low-speed targets which is a head-on engagement, while with negative time-varying navigation ratio can intercept high-speed targets, which is a head-pursuit engagement. To begin with, planar UBPN guidance law is proposed and exact time-varying bias is derived. Moreover, the solution to the singularity in time-varying navigation ratio is given. Secondly, in order to realize the guidance law in three-dimensional space, we derive the relation between two-dimensional acceleration and three-dimensional acceleration, and also give the solution for calculating the impact angle from two-dimensional surface into three-dimensional space. Finally, the simulation results of UBPN compared with proportional navigation, retro-proportional navigation, and bias proportional navigation guidance law are shown. It is demonstrated that the miss distance and impact angle error can meet the guidance law requirements. Capture region of UBPN is given by simulation, which indicates that it is almost two times than that of the guidance law in the head-on engagement for interception of high-speed target.

[1]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Tactical and strategic missile guidance , 1990 .

[2]  Debasish Ghose,et al.  Impact Angle Constrained Guidance Against Nonstationary Nonmaneuvering Targets , 2010 .

[3]  George M Siouris,et al.  Missile Guidance and Control Systems , 2004 .

[4]  Koray S. Erer,et al.  Indirect Impact-Angle-Control Against Stationary Targets Using Biased Pure Proportional Navigation , 2012 .

[5]  R. McGhee,et al.  Optimal biased proportional navigation , 1968 .

[6]  M. Tahk,et al.  Bias-Shaping Method for Biased Proportional Navigation with Terminal-Angle Constraint , 2013 .

[7]  Jang Gyu Lee,et al.  Biased PNG law for impact with angular constraint , 1998 .

[8]  Yuri Ulybyshev Terminal Guidance Law Based on Proportional Navigation , 2005 .

[9]  Debasish Ghose,et al.  Retro-Proportional-Navigation: A New Guidance Law for Interception of High-Speed Targets , 2012 .

[10]  Patrick Costello Simulink simulation of proportional navigation and command to line of sight missile guidance , 1995 .

[11]  U. S. Shukla,et al.  Efficient atmospheric and extra-atmospheric interception through optimally biased proportional navigation , 1989, Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference.

[12]  P. R. Mahapatra,et al.  Optimization of biased proportional navigation (guided projectiles) , 1989 .

[13]  J. Chern,et al.  Ideal Proportional Navigation , 1992 .

[14]  Analytical Solution of Three-Dimensional Realistic True Proportional Navigation , 1996 .

[15]  Tal Shima,et al.  Intercept-Angle Guidance , 2011 .

[16]  Tal Shima,et al.  Head Pursuit Guidance , 2007 .

[17]  Oleg A. Yakimenko,et al.  Trajectory-Shaping Guidance for Interception of Ballistic Missiles During the Boost Phase , 2008 .

[18]  Debasish Ghose,et al.  Impact Angle Constrained Interception of Stationary Targets , 2008 .

[19]  Lei Dou,et al.  Three-dimensional Large Landing Angle Guidance Based on Two-dimensional Guidance Laws , 2011 .