Experimental investigation of the effect of free openings of current collectors on a direct methanol fuel cell

Abstract A current collector is one of the key components of a direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). For a planar-type DMFC, the current collector is usually fabricated from a thin metal that has open holes. The geometry of the current collector may have a significant effect on DMFC performance. Therefore, the design of the current collector is important for DMFC design. The objective of this study is to make a systematic experimental investigation of DMFC performance in the presence of current collectors with different free open ratios and total perimeter lengths of the free openings. Current collectors with 5 × 5, 7 × 7, and 10 × 10 hole arrangements under different total free open ratios of 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60% are investigated. The results show that the total free open ratio can significantly affect cell performance; they also show that decreasing the total free open ratio decreases cell performance, and increasing the total free open ratio increases cell performance. A high total free open ratio affects the total contact area between the membrane electrolyte assembly (MEA) and current collectors. Proper consideration of both the total free open ratio and the total contact area between the MEA and current collectors is necessary for the design of DMFC current collectors. In addition, a longer total perimeter of the free openings yields higher cell performance with the same free open ratio of the current collectors.

[1]  C. Hebling,et al.  Stability of planar PEMFC in Printed Circuit Board technology , 2004 .

[2]  Viral S. Mehta,et al.  Review and analysis of PEM fuel cell design and manufacturing , 2003 .

[3]  Wei Yuan,et al.  Effects of structural aspects on the performance of a passive air-breathing direct methanol fuel cell , 2010 .

[4]  Yean-Der Kuan,et al.  Characterization of a liquid feed direct methanol fuel cell with Sierpinski carpets fractal current collectors , 2008 .

[5]  Eric Johnson,et al.  Direct methanol fuel cells – ready to go commercial? , 2004 .

[6]  Allen M. Hermann,et al.  Bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells: A review , 2005 .

[7]  Isa Bar-On,et al.  Technical cost analysis for PEM fuel cells , 2002 .

[8]  Suk Won Cha,et al.  Development of portable fuel cell arrays with printed-circuit technology , 2003 .

[9]  R. O’Hayre,et al.  Fuel Cell Fundamentals , 2005 .

[10]  F. R. Foulkes,et al.  Fuel Cell Handbook , 1989 .

[11]  B. Steele,et al.  Materials for fuel-cell technologies , 2001, Nature.

[12]  Andreas Schmitz,et al.  Planar self-breathing fuel cells , 2003 .

[13]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Effect of breathing-hole size on the electrochemical species in a free-breathing cathode of a DMFC , 2006 .

[14]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Current Status of and Recent Developments in the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell , 2001 .

[15]  Jing Yi Chang,et al.  Characterization of a direct methanol fuel cell using Hilbert curve fractal current collectors , 2009 .

[16]  Frank A. de Bruijn,et al.  Stainless steel for cost-competitive bipolar plates in PEMFCs , 2000 .

[17]  Osamu Kobayashi,et al.  Mass production cost of PEM fuel cell by learning curve , 2004 .

[18]  Suk Won Cha,et al.  Design and fabrication of a micro fuel cell array with “flip-flop” interconnection , 2002 .

[19]  J. Wind,et al.  Metallic bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells , 2002 .

[20]  Lateral Ionic Conduction in Planar Array Fuel Cells , 2003 .

[21]  Biswa R. Padhy,et al.  Performance of DMFC with SS 316 bipolar/end plates , 2006 .

[22]  D. Mahajan,et al.  Metal bipolar plates for PEM fuel cell—A review , 2007 .

[23]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  International activities in DMFC R&D: status of technologies and potential applications , 2004 .