Public access to research data in language documentation: Challenges and possible strategies

The Open Access Movement promotes free and unfettered access to research publications and, increasingly, to the primary data which underly those publications. As the field of documentary linguistics seeks to record and preserve culturally and linguistically relevant materials, the question of how openly accessible these materials should be becomes increasingly important. This paper aims to guide researchers and other stakeholders in finding an appropriate balance between accessibility and confidentiality of data, addressing community questions and legal, institutional, and intellectual issues that pose challenges to accessible data.

[1]  Jeff Good Ethics in Language Documentation and Revitalization , 2018, The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages.

[3]  G. Driem Endangered Language Research and the Moral Depravity of Ethics Protocols , 2016 .

[4]  Gabriela Caballero,et al.  Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) language description and documentation: a guide to the deposited collection and associated materials , 2017 .

[5]  Gary Holton,et al.  Bringing User-Centered Design to the Field of Language Archives , 2016 .

[6]  F. MacMillan The protection of cultural heritage: common heritage of humankind, national cultural ‘patrimony’ or private property? , 2013 .

[7]  Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker,et al.  Language Archiving , 2018, The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages.

[8]  Keren Rice,et al.  Ethical Issues In Linguistic Fieldwork: An Overview , 2007 .

[9]  Anthony C. Woodbury,et al.  Reproducible research in linguistics: A position statement on data citation and attribution in our field , 2017 .

[10]  David P. Wilkins Linguistic research under aboriginal control: A personal account of fieldwork in central Australia 1 , 1992 .

[11]  Peter Suber Timeline of the open access movement , 2009 .

[12]  Michelle L. Coldrey Data Service Infrastructure for the Social Sciences and Humanities, DASISH , 2012, IASSIST Conference.

[13]  Michael F. Brown Who Owns Native Culture , 2003 .

[14]  Nick Thieberger,et al.  Documentary linguistics and ethical issues , 2007 .

[15]  N. Himmelmann,et al.  Documentary and descriptive linguistics , 1998 .

[16]  K. Rice Ethical Issues in Linguistic Fieldwork , 2011 .

[17]  Informed consent among analog people in a digital world , 2009 .

[18]  L. Borin,et al.  Worrying about ethics and wondering about “informed consent”: Fieldwork from an Americanist perspective , 2006 .

[19]  C. Bowern Fieldwork and the IRB: A snapshot , 2010 .

[20]  J. Overton Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples , 2013 .

[21]  Kimberly Christen Does Information Really Want to be Free? Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Question of Openness , 2012 .

[22]  C. Fluehr-Lobban,et al.  Informed Consent in Anthropological Research: We Are Not Exempt1 , 1994 .

[23]  Kathleen R. Tyner,et al.  Literacy in a Digital World: Teaching and Learning in the Age of Information , 1998 .

[24]  Arienne M. Dwyer,et al.  Ethics and practicalities of cooperative fieldwork and analysis , 2006 .

[25]  Carolyn O’Meara,et al.  Ethical issues in legacy language resources , 2010 .

[26]  Sophie Salffner A Guide to the Ikaan Language and Culture Documentation , 2015 .

[27]  Jennifer M. Urban,et al.  Notice and Takedown in Everyday Practice , 2016 .

[28]  Kimberly Christen Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the “s” Matters , 2015 .

[29]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  Literate Lives in the Information Age: Narratives of Literacy From the United States , 2004 .