Encode a Letter and Get Its Location for Free? Assessing Incidental Binding of Verbal and Spatial Features

Previous studies have demonstrated that when presented with a display of spatially arranged letters, participants seem to remember the letters’ locations when letters are the focus of a recognition test, but do not remember letters’ identity when locations are tested. This strong binding asymmetry suggests that encoding location may be obligatory when remembering letters, which requires explanation within theories of working memory. We report two studies in which participants focused either on remembering letters or locations for a short interval. At test, positive probes were either intact letter–location combinations or recombinations of an observed letter and another previously occupied location. Incidental binding is observed when intact probes are recognized more accurately or faster than recombined probes. Here, however, we observed no evidence of incidental binding of location to letter in either experiment, neither under conditions where participants focused on one feature exclusively for a block, nor where the to-be-remembered feature was revealed prior to encoding with a changing pre-cue, nor where the to-be-remembered feature was retro-cued and therefore unknown during encoding. Our results call into question the robustness of a strong, consistent binding asymmetry. They suggest that while incidental location-to-letter binding may sometimes occur, it is not obligatory.

[1]  Pascal J. Kieslich,et al.  lab.js: A free, open, online study builder , 2021, Behavior research methods.

[2]  Sebastian Schneegans,et al.  Location-independent feature binding in visual working memory for sequentially presented objects , 2021, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[3]  J. Rouder,et al.  Are There Reliable Qualitative Individual Difference in Cognition? , 2020, Journal of cognition.

[4]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  In the Beginning Was the Deed: Verbal Short-Term Memory as Object-Oriented Action , 2018, Current Directions in Psychological Science.

[5]  S. Farrell,et al.  No evidence of binding items to spatial configuration representations in visual working memory , 2018, Memory & Cognition.

[6]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Baysefactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , 2018 .

[7]  Candice C. Morey,et al.  On the Right Track? Investigating the Effect of Path Characteristics on Visuospatial Bootstrapping in Verbal Serial Recall , 2017, Journal of cognition.

[8]  J. Havelka,et al.  Visuospatial Bootstrapping , 2017 .

[9]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs , 2015 .

[10]  James Grange,et al.  An Implementation of Common Response Time Trimming Methods , 2015 .

[11]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Remembering complex objects in visual working memory: do capacity limits restrict objects or features? , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Hui Chen,et al.  Amnesia for Object Attributes , 2015, Psychological science.

[13]  F. Parmentier,et al.  The asymmetry and temporal dynamics of incidental letter–location bindings in working memory , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Evie Vergauwe,et al.  The maintenance of cross-domain associations in the episodic buffer. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Visual working memory declines when more features must be remembered for each object , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Katherine Guérard,et al.  Asymmetric binding in serial memory for verbal and spatial information , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[17]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .

[18]  A. Baddeley Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  Robert S. Leiken,et al.  A User’s Guide , 2011 .

[20]  C. Morey Maintaining binding in working memory: Comparing the effects of intentional goals and incidental affordances , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  Jean-Philippe van Dijck,et al.  A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations , 2011, Cognition.

[22]  Snehlata Jaswal,et al.  Feature binding in visual short-term memory is unaffected by task-irrelevant changes of location, shape, and color , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Francisco del Pozo,et al.  Oscillatory activity in prefrontal and posterior regions during implicit letter-location binding , 2010, NeuroImage.

[25]  C. Morey Integrated cross-domain object storage in working memory: Evidence from a verbal–spatial memory task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  F. Parmentier,et al.  Short article: Is verbal–spatial binding in working memory impaired by a concurrent memory load? , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Binding of verbal and spatial features in auditory working memory , 2009 .

[28]  Katherine Guérard,et al.  Short Article: Similarity and Binding in Memory: Bound to be Detrimental , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[30]  A. Capilla,et al.  Temporal dynamics of parietal activity during word-location binding. , 2008, Neuropsychology.

[31]  A. Treisman,et al.  Location and binding in visual working memory , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Pilar Andrés,et al.  The Impact of Path Crossing on Visuo-Spatial Serial Memory: Encoding or Rehearsal Effect? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  F. Parmentier,et al.  Transitional information in spatial serial memory: path characteristics affect recall performance. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  J. D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.