Degradation of isolated grass mesophyll, epidermis and fibre cell walls in the rumen and by cellulolytic rumen bacteria in axenic culture

The degradation of cell walls of mesophyll, epidermis and fibre cells isolated from leaves of perennial and Italian ryegrass within the sheep rumen or by selected strains of rumen bacteria in vitro, was followed by estimation of dry matter loss, or loss of neutral sugar residues. Primary cell walls (mesophyll and epidermis) were fully degraded within 12 h in the rumen, while the more heavily lignified fibre cell walls showed only a 40% loss of dry matter over the same period. Neutral sugar residues were lost at a common rate from walls of all three cell types. Incubation of cell walls with cellulolytic bacteria showed that the extent to which cell walls were attacked was constantly ordered (epidermis > mesophyll > fibre). The rate of degradation of cell walls was less in axenic culture than within the rumen. Greatest weight losses were produced by Ruminococcus albus, followed by Bacteroides succinogenes, with Ruminococcus flavefaciens effecting the least change, regardless of the nature of the cell wall provided as a substrate. Xylose was more readily lost from primary cell walls than glucose during the early stages of attack, but both were lost at a common rate from fibre cell walls. Dry matter losses produced by the hemicellulolytic strain, Bacteroides ruminocola, were limited even after extended incubation. Electron microscopy indicated that R. albus was less commonly attached to cell walls than were the other cellulolytic strains, although evidence of capsular material was present. Bacteroides succinogenes was seen with an extensive capsule which enveloped clusters of cells, forming micro-colonies in association with the plant cell wall. Vesicle-like structures, commonly associated with the cellulolytic bacteria R. albus and B. succinogenes, were found on comparatively few occasions in this study.

[1]  J. Luft Ruthenium red and violet. I. Chemistry, purification, methods of use for electron microscopy and mechanism of action , 1971, The Anatomical record.

[2]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  Effect of 3-Phenylpropanoic Acid on Capsule and Cellulases of Ruminococcus albus 8 , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  D. Dinsdale,et al.  Electron microscopy of bacteria involved in the digestion of plant cell walls , 1984 .

[4]  B. Jarvis,et al.  The role of carbonate in the metabolism of glucose by Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. , 1978, Journal of general microbiology.

[5]  R. Henry,et al.  A SIMPLE AND RAPID PREPARATION OF ALDITOL ACETATES FOR MONOSACCHARIDE ANALYSIS , 1983 .

[6]  S. Duncan,et al.  The effect of ammonia treatment on the solubilization of straw and the growth of cellulolytic rumen bacteria. , 1985, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[7]  M. P. Bryant,et al.  Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. , 1972, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  G. Palade A STUDY OF FIXATION FOR ELECTRON MICROSCOPY , 1952, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  C. Forsberg,et al.  Cellulase and Xylanase Release from Bacteroides succinogenes and Its Importance in the Rumen Environment , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  A. Chesson,et al.  Methylation analysis of mesophyll, epidermis, and fibre cell-walls isolated from the leaves of perennial and Italian ryegrass , 1985 .

[11]  N. Blumenkrantz,et al.  New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids. , 1973, Analytical biochemistry.

[12]  P. Åman,et al.  INFLUENCE OF HEAT STERILIZATION AND AMMONIATION ON STRAW COMPOSITION AND DEGRADATION BY PURE CULTURES OF CELLULOLYTIC RUMEN BACTERIA , 1985 .

[13]  L. O. Ely,et al.  Relationship of Rate and Extent of Digestion to Forage Utilization-A Dynamic Model Evaluation , 1982 .

[14]  D. E. Akin,et al.  Percentage of Tissue Types in Tropical and Temperate Grass Leaf Blades and Degradation of Tissues by Rumen Microorganisms 1 , 1975 .

[15]  A. Chesson,et al.  Preparation and composition of mesophyll, epidermis and fibre cell walls from leaves of perennial ryegrass (lolium perenne) and italian ryegrass (lolium multiflorum) , 1985 .

[16]  D. Dinsdale,et al.  Selective isolation and characteristics of Bacteriodes succinogenes from the rumen of a cow , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  C. Orpin The role of ciliate protozoa and fungi in the rumen digestion of plant cell walls , 1984 .

[18]  B. A. Dehority,et al.  Extent of Cellulose and Hemicellulose Digestion in Various Forages by Pure Cultures of Rumen Bacteria , 1967 .

[19]  D. E. Akin Microscopic evaluation of forage digestion by rumen microorganisms--a review. , 1979, Journal of animal science.

[20]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. , 1950, Bacteriological reviews.

[21]  L. H. Harbers,et al.  Digestion of Corn and Sorghum Silage Observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy , 1980 .

[22]  S. Duncan,et al.  The effect of avoparcin on cellulolytic bacteria of the ovine rumen , 1985 .

[23]  E. J. Morris,et al.  Comparison of the action of rumen bacteria on cell walls from Eragrostis tef , 1980, The Journal of Agricultural Science.