Confinement effects on the kinetics and thermodynamics of protein dimerization

In the cell, protein complexes form by relying on specific interactions between their monomers. Excluded volume effects due to molecular crowding would lead to correlations between molecules even without specific interactions. What is the interplay of these effects in the crowded cellular environment? We study dimerization of a model homodimer when the mondimers are free and when they are tethered to each other. We consider a structured environment: Two monomers first diffuse into a cavity of size L and then fold and bind within the cavity. The folding and binding are simulated by using molecular dynamics based on a simplified topology based model. The confinement in the cell is described by an effective molecular concentration C ∼ L−3. A two-state coupled folding and binding behavior is found. We show the maximal rate of dimerization occurred at an effective molecular concentration Cop ≃ 1 mM, which is a relevant cellular concentration. In contrast, for tethered chains the rate keeps at a plateau when C < Cop but then decreases sharply when C > Cop. For both the free and tethered cases, the simulated variation of the rate of dimerization and thermodynamic stability with effective molecular concentration agrees well with experimental observations. In addition, a theoretical argument for the effects of confinement on dimerization is also made.

[1]  Allen P. Minton,et al.  Cell biology: Join the crowd , 2003, Nature.

[2]  R. Sauer,et al.  Equilibrium dissociation and unfolding of the Arc repressor dimer. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[3]  P. Gennes Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics , 1979 .

[4]  A. Tamura,et al.  The entropy cost of protein association. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Ribosome exit tunnel can entropically stabilize alpha-helices. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  A. Verkman,et al.  Crowding effects on diffusion in solutions and cells. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[7]  B. Roux,et al.  Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Simulations of β-hairpin folding confined to spherical pores using distributed computing , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Guy Ziv,et al.  Ribosome exit tunnel can entropically stabilize α-helices , 2005 .

[10]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Protein folding under confinement: A role for solvent , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Zimmerman,et al.  Estimation of macromolecule concentrations and excluded volume effects for the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  H. Gaub,et al.  Intermolecular forces and energies between ligands and receptors. , 1994, Science.

[13]  R. Sauer,et al.  P22 Arc repressor: folding kinetics of a single-domain, dimeric protein. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[14]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou,et al.  Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[15]  Polymer Chains in Confined Spaces and Flow-Injection Problems: Some Remarks , 2005, cond-mat/0506803.

[16]  Shoji Takada,et al.  How protein thermodynamics and folding mechanisms are altered by the chaperonin cage: Molecular simulations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Sauer,et al.  Equilibrium stability and sub-millisecond refolding of a designed single-chain Arc repressor. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[18]  R. Ellis Macromolecular crowding : obvious but underappreciated , 2022 .

[19]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Brownian dynamics simulation of diffusion‐influenced bimolecular reactions , 1984 .

[20]  R. Sauer,et al.  Barriers to protein folding: formation of buried polar interactions is a slow step in acquisition of structure. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  A. Minton Implications of macromolecular crowding for protein assembly. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[22]  S. Takada Go-ing for the prediction of protein folding mechanisms. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Dmitri K. Klimov,et al.  Caging helps proteins fold , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Folding funnels and frustration in off-lattice minimalist protein landscapes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  N Vaidehi,et al.  Stabilization of coiled-coil peptide domains by introduction of trifluoroleucine. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[26]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Molecular crowding enhances native state stability and refolding rates of globular proteins. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Yaakov Levy,et al.  Simulations of proteins with inhomogeneous degrees of freedom: The effect of thermostats , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  Robert B. Best,et al.  Thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding under confinement , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  T. Terwilliger,et al.  Genetic fusion of subunits of a dimeric protein substantially enhances its stability and rate of folding. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding of a de novo designed four-helix bundle protein. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Erik Luijten,et al.  Self-avoiding flexible polymers under spherical confinement. , 2006, Nano letters.

[33]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  A survey of flexible protein binding mechanisms and their transition states using native topology based energy landscapes. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  R. Kaptein,et al.  Structure of Arc represser in solution: evidence for a family of β-sheet DMA-binding proteins , 1990, Nature.

[35]  J. Matthews,et al.  The power of two: protein dimerization in biology. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[36]  Jun Wang,et al.  Folding behavior of chaperonin‐mediated substrate protein , 2005, Proteins.

[37]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.