Interpretive Diversity Explains Metaphor–Simile Distinction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Glucksberg Sam,et al. On the Relation Between Metaphor and Simile: When Comparison Fails , 2006 .
[2] T. Kusumi,et al. The effect of repeated presentation and aptness of figurative comparisons on preference for metaphor forms , 2004 .
[3] S. Glucksberg,et al. Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity. , 1990 .
[4] R. Kreuz,et al. Why Do People Use Figurative Language? , 1994 .
[5] G. Lakoff,et al. Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .
[6] J. Kennedy,et al. Literal Bases for Metaphor and Simile , 2001 .
[7] S. Glucksberg. Understanding figurative language : from metaphors to idioms , 2001 .
[8] J M Kennedy,et al. Aptness predicts preference for metaphors or similes, as well as recall bias , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[9] Effects of categorical dissimilarity and affective similarity between constituent words on metaphor appreciation , 1987 .
[10] S. Glucksberg,et al. When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean , 1999 .
[11] Andrew T. Johnson,et al. Comprehension of metaphors and Similes: A Reaction Time Study , 1996 .
[12] S. Glucksberg. The psycholinguistics of metaphor , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[13] John M. Kennedy,et al. Reversibility, Aptness, and the Conventionality of Metaphors and Similes , 2003 .
[14] Brian M. Friel,et al. Attribution of discourse goals for using concrete- and abstract-tenor metaphors and similes with or without discourse context , 2006 .
[15] G. Lakoff,et al. Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .
[16] Yasushi Hino,et al. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[17] A. Utsumi. The Role of Feature Emergence in Metaphor Appreciation , 2005 .
[18] R. Gibbs. Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .
[19] Lara L. Jones,et al. Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization. , 2005 .
[20] Sam Glucksberg,et al. Can Florida Become Like the Next Florida? , 2006, Psychological science.
[21] Akira Utsumi. Computational Exploration of Metaphor Comprehension Processes , 2006 .
[22] J M Kennedy,et al. Are Metaphors Elliptical Similes? , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[23] Brian F. Bowdle,et al. Convention, Form, and Figurative Language Processing , 2001 .
[24] Dedre Gentner,et al. Metaphor Comprehension: From Comparison to Categorization , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
[25] N. Mergler,et al. Metaphor Comprehension: In Search of Literal Truth, Possible Sense, and Metaphoricity , 1990 .
[26] W. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access , 2002 .
[27] Ron Borowsky,et al. SEMANTIC AMBIGUITY EFFECTS IN WORD IDENTIFICATION , 1996 .
[28] Dedre Gentner,et al. Why do metaphors seem deeper than similes? , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
[29] Brian F. Bowdle,et al. The career of metaphor. , 2005, Psychological review.
[30] Lara L. Jones,et al. Roosters, robins, and alarm clocks : Aptness and conventionality in metaphor comprehension , 2006 .
[31] P. Pexman,et al. Number-of-features effects and semantic processing , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[32] John M. Kennedy,et al. Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similes , 2003 .