Statistical baseline assessment in cardiotocography

Cardiotocography (CTG) is the most common non-invasive diagnostic technique to evaluate fetal well-being. It consists in the recording of fetal heart rate (FHR; bpm) and maternal uterine contractions. Among the main parameters characterizing FHR, baseline (BL) is fundamental to determine fetal hypoxia and distress. In computerized applications, BL is typically computed as mean FHR±ΔFHR, with ΔFHR=8 bpm or ΔFHR=10 bpm, both values being experimentally fixed. In this context, the present work aims: to propose a statistical procedure for ΔFHR assessment; to quantitatively determine ΔFHR value by applying such procedure to clinical data; and to compare the statistically-determined ΔFHR value against the experimentally-determined ΔFHR values. To these aims, the 552 recordings of the “CTU-UHB intrapartum CTG database” from Physionet were submitted to an automatic procedure, which consisted in a FHR preprocessing phase and a statistical BL assessment. During preprocessing, FHR time series were divided into 20-min sliding windows, in which missing data were removed by linear interpolation. Only windows with a correction rate lower than 10% were further processed for BL assessment, according to which ΔFHR was computed as FHR standard deviation. Total number of accepted windows was 1192 (38.5%) over 383 recordings (69.4%) with at least an accepted window. Statistically-determined ΔFHR value was 9.7 bpm. Such value was statistically different from 8 bpm (P<10−19) but not from 10 bpm (P=0.16). Thus, ΔFHR=10 bpm is preferable over 8 bpm because both experimentally and statistically validated.

[1]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[2]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  Clinical application of the Segmented-Beat Modulation Method for fetal ECG extraction , 2015, 2015 12th International Workshop on Intelligent Solutions in Embedded Systems (WISES).

[3]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  CTG Analyzer: A graphical user interface for cardiotocography , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[4]  D. Arduini,et al.  COMPUTERIZED ANALYSIS OF FETAL HEART RATE , 1994, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[5]  Jonathan M. Garibaldi,et al.  A Fuzzy System for Fetal Heart Rate Assessment , 1999, Fuzzy Days.

[6]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Open access intrapartum CTG database , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[7]  João Bernardes,et al.  Comparison of fetal heart rate baseline estimation by SisPorto 2.01 and a consensus of clinicians. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[8]  J. M. Swartjes,et al.  Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate: 1. Baseline determination. , 1990, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[9]  L. Burattini,et al.  Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiography: An Overview of the Signal Electrophysiological Meaning, Recording Procedures, and Processing Techniques , 2015, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[10]  D. Ayres-de- Campos,et al.  SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. , 2000, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine.

[11]  Mohd Alauddin Mohd Ali,et al.  A novel cardiotocography fetal heart rate baseline estimation algorithm , 2010 .

[12]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[13]  M. A. Mohd. Ali,et al.  Cardiotocography Trace Pattern Evaluation Using MATLAB Program , .

[14]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  A New Segmented-Beat Modulation Algorithm for Maternal ECG Estimation from Abdominal Recordings , 2014, mBiDA.

[15]  Sandro Fioretti,et al.  Relationship between deceleration areas in the second stage of labor and neonatal acidemia , 2016, 2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).