Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation.

INTRODUCTION Several noninvasive methods are used for 3-dimensional (3D) morphologic facial and dental analysis to aid practitioners during diagnosis and treatment planning. Integrating dental and facial noninvasive 3D reproduction could improve the efficacy of treatment management. METHODS Dental virtual model and soft-tissue facial morphology were digitally integrated from 11 adults with a 3D stereophotogrammetric imaging system (Vectra, Canfield Scientific, Fairfield, NJ). The digital 3D coordinates of 3 facial landmarks (N, nasion; Ftr, frontotemporale right; Ftl, frontotemporale left) and 3 dental landmarks (I, interincisor; Pr, PI, tips of the mesiovestibular cusps of the right and left first permanent premolars) were then obtained by using Vectra's software. Additionally, the coordinates of the same 6 landmarks were digitized directly on each subject by using a 3D computerized electromagnetic digitizer (in vivo). Seven linear measurements were made between the occlusal plane (Pr-I-Pl) and the facial landmarks (Ftr-N-Ftl). The accuracy and reliability of the reconstruction were tested by in-vivo measurements and repeated acquisitions. RESULTS The greatest mean relative error of measurements was smaller than 1.2%. No significant differences in repeatable reproductions were found. CONCLUSIONS Integration of facial stereophotogrammetry acquisition and dental laser scan reproduction is possible with marginal error.

[1]  E. Çelik,et al.  Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis. , 2009, European journal of orthodontics.

[2]  Siegmar Reinert,et al.  Digital Surface Photogrammetry for Anthropometric Analysis of the Cleft Infant Face , 2006, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[3]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Three-Dimensional Computerized Anthropometry of the Nose: Landmark Representation Compared to Surface Analysis , 2007, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[4]  S. Bishara Facial and dental changes in adolescents and their clinical implications. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  Gunnar Dahlberg Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. , 1941 .

[6]  Kristina Aldridge,et al.  Precision and error of three‐dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[7]  A. Moro,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis in Facial Asymmetry: Comparison With Model Analysis and Conventional Two-Dimensional Analysis , 2009, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[8]  A F Ayoub,et al.  Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system. , 2008, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of an Electromagnetic Three-Dimensional Digitizer in Facial Anthropometry , 1998, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[10]  C. A. Hood,et al.  Validation of a Vision-Based, Three-Dimensional Facial Imaging System , 2003, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  S. Richmond,et al.  Three‐dimensional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial morphology and their application to maxillofacial surgery , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[12]  Mary L Marazita,et al.  Digital Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry: Evaluation of Anthropometric Precision and Accuracy Using a Genex 3D Camera System , 2004, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[13]  Filip Schutyser,et al.  Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  W. Mollemans,et al.  The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  R J Winder,et al.  Technical validation of the Di3D stereophotogrammetry surface imaging system. , 2008, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[16]  R. Hennekam,et al.  3D analysis of facial morphology , 2004, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[17]  V. Ferrario,et al.  Soft tissue facial planes and masticatory muscle function in skeletal Class III patients before and after orthognathic surgery treatment. , 2008, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[18]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Growth and aging of facial soft tissues: A computerized three‐dimensional mesh diagram analysis , 2003, Clinical anatomy.

[19]  Gary F. Rogers,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Craniofacial Anthropometric Measurement of 3D Digital Photogrammetric Images , 2008, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.