Sequence complexity in Darwinian evolution

Whether or not Darwinian evolution leads to an increase in complexity depends crucially on what we mean by the term. Physical complexity is a measure based on automata theory and information theory that turns out to be a simple and intuitive measure of the amount of information that an organism stores, in its genome, about the environment in which it evolves. It can be shown that the physical complexity of the genomes of clonal organisms must increase in evolution, if they occupy a single niche and if the environment does not change. This law of increasing complexity is a consequence of natural selection only and can be violated in co-evolving systems as well as at high mutation rates, in sexual populations, and in time-dependent landscapes. Yet, co-evolution, because it can be viewed as creating an increase in physical complexity across niches, is likely the agent of a global increase in complexity.

[1]  G. Yedid,et al.  Microevolution in an Electronic Microcosm , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[2]  G. Basharin On a Statistical Estimate for the Entropy of a Sequence of Independent Random Variables , 1959 .

[3]  Influence of chance, history and adaptation on evolution in Digitalia , 2000 .

[4]  M. Eigen,et al.  Natural selection: a phase transition? , 2000, Biophysical chemistry.

[5]  G. Yedid,et al.  Macroevolution simulated with autonomously replicating computer programs , 2002, Nature.

[6]  Chris Adami Learning and complexity in genetic auto-adaptive systems , 1995 .

[7]  C. Adami,et al.  Evolution of Biological Complexity , 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[8]  D. McShea PERSPECTIVE METAZOAN COMPLEXITY AND EVOLUTION: IS THERE A TREND? , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Universal computation and physical dynamics , 1995 .

[10]  Daniel W. McShea,et al.  Functional Complexity in Organisms: Parts as Proxies , 2000 .

[11]  A. Kondrashov Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction , 1988, Nature.

[12]  M. Wade,et al.  Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process , 2000 .

[13]  C. Adami,et al.  Introduction To Artificial Life , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[14]  C. Adami,et al.  Physical complexity of symbolic sequences , 1996, adap-org/9605002.

[15]  R. Badii,et al.  Complexity: Hierarchical Structures and Scaling in Physics , 1997 .

[16]  C. Ofria,et al.  Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest , 2001, Nature.

[17]  C. Ofria,et al.  Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms , 1999, Nature.

[18]  C. Wilke,et al.  The biology of digital organisms , 2002 .

[19]  Thomas S. Ray,et al.  An Approach to the Synthesis of Life , 1991 .

[20]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Information measures, effective complexity, and total information , 1996 .

[21]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.