Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species

Summary 1There is limited understanding of patterns of variation that exist among root traits of different species, especially under field conditions. We contrasted 11 fast- and slow-growing species paired within five evolutionary lineages to investigate whether root traits associated with soil resource acquisition were related to species’ potential growth rate. 2Measurements of root morphology, architecture, nitrogen and phenolic concentration, respiration and phosphorus uptake were taken on fine, non-woody roots sampled from forest stands in central Pennsylvania, USA. 3Across all five contrasts, roots of fast-growing species generally had higher specific root length, smaller diameters, greater degree of branching, and lower phenolic concentrations than those of slow-growing species. This suggests differences in potential soil exploration and root defences among species differing in potential growth rate. 4There were no significant differences between fast- and slow-growing species in root tissue density, respiration or P uptake. Lack of root physiological differences between species differing in growth rate contrasted with previous research on chamber-grown seedlings. 5These results imply that, while roots of fast-growing species may be constructed for more rapid soil exploration and shorter life span than those of slow-growing species, root physiology is either more closely tied to overall plant physiology, which is more similar among mature trees, or masked by variation in soil microsites, root age or interactions with mycorrhizal fungi.

[1]  Christina E. Wells,et al.  Changes in the risk of fine-root mortality with age: a case study in peach, Prunus persica (Rosaceae). , 2002, American journal of botany.

[2]  C. Messier,et al.  Soil Exploitation Strategies of Fine Roots in Different Tree Species of the Southern Boreal Forest of Eastern Canada , 1999 .

[3]  T. Fahey,et al.  Efficiency of Nutrient Acquisition by Fine Roots and Mycorrhizae , 1995 .

[4]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[5]  R. Peterson.  Adaptations of root structure in relation to biotic and abiotic factors , 1992 .

[6]  D. Eissenstat,et al.  On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: a field study using citrus rootstocks , 1991 .

[7]  P. Reich,et al.  Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate , 1998 .

[8]  Peter Ryser,et al.  The importance of tissue density for growth and life span of leaves and roots: a comparison of five ecologically contrasting grasses , 1996 .

[9]  L. Comas,et al.  Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species , 2002, Oecologia.

[10]  J. H. Manwaring,et al.  Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localized soil enrichment , 1990, Nature.

[11]  William M. Schaffer,et al.  Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[12]  K. L. Nielsen,et al.  Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerised analysis of root length and diameter , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[13]  L. Comas,et al.  Assessing root death and root system dynamics in a study of grape canopy pruning. , 2000 .

[14]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Linkages between plant litter decomposition, litter quality, and vegetation responses to herbivores , 2002 .

[15]  Peter Ryser,et al.  Root tissue structure is linked to ecological strategies of grasses. , 2000, The New phytologist.

[16]  H. Lambers,et al.  Respiratory energy requirements of roots vary with the potential growth rate of a plant species , 1991 .

[17]  H. Lambers,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[18]  Veronica C. Lessard,et al.  Variation in sugar maple root respiration with root diameter and soil depth. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[19]  Ian J. Wright,et al.  Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients , 1999 .

[20]  R. Yanai,et al.  The Ecology of Root Lifespan , 1997 .

[21]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[22]  David Tilman,et al.  The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients , 2001 .

[23]  Michael F. Allen,et al.  FINE ROOT ARCHITECTURE OF NINE NORTH AMERICAN TREES , 2002 .

[24]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[25]  K. Thompson,et al.  Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies , 1999 .

[26]  H. Lambers,et al.  Why do fast- and slow-growing grass species differ so little in their rate of root respiration, considering the large differences in rate of growth and ion uptake? , 1998 .

[27]  P. Kalisz,et al.  Single-Tree Influence on Soil Properties in the Mountains of Eastern Kentucky , 1990 .

[28]  F. Meinzer.  Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment , 2002, Oecologia.

[29]  B. H. Honkala,et al.  Silvics of North America , 1990 .

[30]  D. Tilman.  Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. (MPB-26), Volume 26 , 1988 .

[31]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[32]  P. Reich,et al.  Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes: Ecology , 1999 .

[33]  Peter G. Waterman,et al.  Analysis of Phenolic Plant Metabolites , 1994 .

[34]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Evolution of Suites of Traits in Response to Environmental Stress , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[35]  Jay H. Jones.  Evolution of the Fagaceae: the implications of foliar features , 1986 .

[36]  K. L. Nielsen,et al.  Effects of phosphorus availability and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizas on the carbon budget of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) , 1998 .

[37]  P. Zinke,et al.  The Pattern of Influence of Individual Forest Trees on Soil Properties , 1962 .

[38]  U. Hartmond,et al.  Estimating age‐dependent costs and benefits of roots with contrasting life span: comparing apples and oranges , 2001 .

[39]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore Defense , 1985, Science.

[40]  J. Graham,et al.  Growth Depression in Mycorrhizal Citrus at High-Phosphorus Supply (Analysis of Carbon Costs) , 1993, Plant physiology.

[41]  K. Steele,et al.  Phylogenetic analyses of "higher" Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. , 1997, American journal of botany.

[42]  G. Fairchild,et al.  A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. , 1990, The New phytologist.