Integrating students' learning experiences through deliberate reflective practice

This paper presents the evaluation of an alternative procedure to facilitate engineering students' reflective learning in the context of situated learning experiences. The procedure takes the format of a focus group with specific triggers to elicit students' accounts of critical learning experiences. This reflection starts from students' concrete, intuitive feelings of consternation when their prior understandings of engineering were challenged by a situation encountered in practice - we call these competence anomalies. The effectiveness of the suggested procedure was evaluated in a survey of 58 engineering students who had participated in trial focus groups. The analysis of the 5 point Likert scale ratings indicated that the majority of students (78.9%) saw significant benefits from their participation. Subsequent questions revealed that the focus groups supported the recall of learning incidents but did not give students enough guidance in interpreting their experiences. For the further development of the tool we thus propose a four step SAID structure (Situation, Affect, Interpretation, Decision). The paper concludes with an outlook on the implementation of this expanded concept as a concurrent reflective tool in an innovative engineering synthesis and design studio series. In this context, the reflection is intended to promote overall integrative learning that encompasses the curriculum, situated learning as well as the students' prior and current life experiences.

[1]  David Radcliffe,et al.  Engineering education: Targeted learning outcomes or accidental competencies? , 2006 .

[2]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  A New Journal for a Field in Transition , 2005 .

[3]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[4]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century : Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future , 2004 .

[5]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[6]  D. Dibiasio,et al.  Experiential Learning Environments: Do They Prepare Our Students to be Self‐Directed, Life‐Long Learners? , 2006 .

[7]  Christine Hogan,et al.  Creative and reflective journal processes , 1995 .

[8]  D. Mcclelland.  Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". , 1973, The American psychologist.

[9]  David C. McClelland,et al.  Identifying Competencies with Behavioral-Event Interviews , 1998 .

[10]  G. Scott,et al.  Using successful graduates to improve the quality of undergraduate engineering programmes , 2002 .

[11]  Van Gyn.  Reflective Practice: The Needs of Professions and the Promise of Cooperative Education. , 1996 .

[12]  David Dowling.  Designing a competency based program to facilitate the progression of experienced engineering technologists to professional engineer status , 2006 .

[13]  C. Griffin,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Learning , 1998 .

[14]  Lyle M. Spencer,et al.  Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance , 1993 .

[15]  C. Bao Iturbe,et al.  Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[16]  R. Canale,et al.  Distance learning (via Internet) for cooperative education students during coop work periods , 1996, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE'96 26th Annual Conference.

[17]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[18]  L. Steels,et al.  Grounding adaptive language games in robotic agents , 2006, AAAI 2012.

[19]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[20]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .

[21]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[22]  David Radcliffe.  Shaping the Discipline of Engineering Education , 2006 .

[23]  Kamyar Haghighi,et al.  Quiet No Longer: Birth of a New Discipline , 2005 .

[24]  S. Engel,et al.  Thought and Language , 1964, Dialogue.

[25]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  The Intellectual Development of Science and Engineering Students. Part 1: Models and Challenges , 2004 .

[26]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[27]  Edward J. Coyle,et al.  EPICS: A Model for Integrating Service-Learning into the Engineering Curriculum , 1997 .

[28]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models , 2006 .

[29]  J. Wilder.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1954 .

[30]  David Radcliffe.  Formal learning within a community of practice , 2002 .

[31]  Lesley Jolly,et al.  Strategies For Developing Reflexive Habits In Students , 2000 .

[32]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[33]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[34]  D. Radcliffe,et al.  A holistic view on the development of engineering students' flexible and creative problem solving , 2008 .

[35]  Wm. A. Wulf,et al.  A Makeover for Engineering Education. , 2002 .

[36]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive psychology and its implications, 2nd ed. , 1985 .

[37]  Alice M. Agogino.  Educating the Engineer of 2020 , 2008 .

[38]  J. Walther,et al.  Analysis of the use of an accidental competency discourse as a reflective tool for professional placement students , 2007, 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports.