Surrogate safety indicator for unsignalised pedestrian crossings

Abstract Problem Although the road safety situation in Poland is generally improving, the number of accidents at pedestrian crossings has not decreased in the last four years. This paper presents the results of the MOBIS research project, the aim of which was to develop surrogate safety indicators, based on detection of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts using video analysis. Method Pedestrian and vehicle traffic was filmed at two unsignalised pedestrian zebra crossings in Warsaw and Wroclaw for over 40 days. Motion trajectories of vehicles and pedestrians were determined based on video processing. Several variables describing pedestrian-vehicle interactions were calculated, such as speed, post-encroachment time, distance between the participants, decelerations, etc. Classification of encounters was based on interactions of pedestrians and vehicles i.e. drivers yielding to pedestrians, vehicles passing just in front of, or behind pedestrians. Results and discussion Criteria for identification of dangerous encounters were selected with the assumption that it should be possible to automate the assessment process. The selected variables were: pedestrian-vehicle passing distance and the vehicle speed at that moment. Other criteria were used in cases of abrupt braking – deceleration exceeding 4 m/s2 and vehicle speed. A Dangerous Encounter Index is proposed as a surrogate safety indicator for pedestrian crossings. It relates the occurrence of dangerous events to exposure, defined as the number of pedestrian-vehicle encounters. Practical applications The proposed index shows that crossing two lanes involves more risk than crossing one lane, given similar traffic flow. Some improvement of safety at both types of crossing was observed after active signage involving blinking lights had been introduced. The proposed method is a step towards automation of safety assessment.

[1]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: open questions and some insights , 2014 .

[2]  Thomas Jonsson,et al.  Relative fatality risk curve to describe the effect of change in the impact speed on fatality risk of pedestrians struck by a motor vehicle. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Pedestrian Detection: An Evaluation of the State of the Art , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Sergio A. Velastin,et al.  Backgroundless detection of pedestrians in cluttered conditions based on monocular images: a review , 2012 .

[5]  Ulrich Sander,et al.  Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Lihui Peng,et al.  Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction Analysis in Mixed Traffic Condition , 2011 .

[7]  Max Bushell,et al.  Pedestrian crash trends and potential countermeasures from around the world. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  P. Olszewski,et al.  Investigating safety of vulnerable road users in selected EU countries. , 2019, Journal of safety research.

[9]  C. Hydén THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION: THE SWEDISH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS TECHNIQUE , 1987 .

[10]  A Várhelyi,et al.  Drivers' speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  David Gerónimo Gómez,et al.  Survey of Pedestrian Detection for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  S. Cafiso,et al.  Pedestrian Crossing Safety Improvements: Before and After Study using Traffic Conflict Techniques , 2010 .

[13]  Nagui M Rouphail,et al.  Development and Implementation of Conflict-Based Assessment of Pedestrian Safety to Evaluate Accessibility of Complex Intersections , 2012, Transportation research record.

[14]  Ioannis Kaparias,et al.  Development and Implementation of a Vehicle–Pedestrian Conflict Analysis Method , 2010 .

[15]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts Using Video Data , 2009 .

[16]  Brian C Tefft,et al.  Impact speed and a pedestrian's risk of severe injury or death. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Christer Hydén,et al.  Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Witold Czajewski,et al.  Video Processing for Detection and Tracking of Pedestrians and Vehicles at Zebra Crossings , 2015, TST.

[19]  P. Olszewski,et al.  Problems with Assessing Safety of Vulnerable Road Users Based on Traffic Accident Data , 2016 .

[20]  Zhixiang Fang,et al.  Quantitative analysis of lane-based pedestrian-vehicle conflict at a non-signalized marked crosswalk , 2016 .

[21]  Ilona Buttler,et al.  SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS WITH VIDEO ANALYSIS , 2014 .

[22]  Helena Stigson,et al.  Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Witold Czajewski,et al.  Innovative solutions for improving safety at pedestrian crossings , 2013 .

[24]  Stijn Daniels,et al.  In search of the severity dimension of traffic events: Extended Delta-V as a traffic conflict indicator. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  P. Olszewski,et al.  Pedestrian fatality risk in accidents at unsignalized zebra crosswalks in Poland. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.