Imaging breast cancer response during neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is used to enable breast-conserving surgery in patients with large primary operable breast cancers. It is important to be able to accurately assess response to systemic therapy, both to assist the surgeon and for prognostic purposes. Moreover, a proportion of women will fail to respond to treatment and would potentially benefit from either a change in therapy or earlier surgery rather than continuing completion of the planned course of treatment. Conventional techniques of assessing response (clinical examination, x-ray mammography and breast ultrasound) rely on changes in tumor size, which are often delayed and do not always correlate with pathologic response. This review examines the evidence for functional imaging techniques including scintimammography, functional computed tomography, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, spectroscopy and positron emission tomography. These techniques measure changes in tumor vasculature, metabolism or proliferation and may prove to be earlier and more sensitive measures of response to systemic therapy, thus enabling tailoring of an individual’s treatment.

[1]  E. Conant,et al.  Breast Cancer Detection Based on Incremental Biochemical and Physiological Properties of Breast Cancers , 2005 .

[2]  D. Sahani,et al.  Assessing tumor perfusion and treatment response in rectal cancer with multisection CT: initial observations. , 2005, Radiology.

[3]  T. Powles,et al.  Good clinical response of breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy is associated with improved overall survival. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  D. Yee,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer: predicting response with in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopy--a pilot study at 4 T. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  J. Ro,et al.  Predictive value of [18F]FDG PET for pathological response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  M O Leach,et al.  Does vascular imaging with MRI predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer? , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Per Skaane,et al.  Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. , 2004, Radiology.

[8]  A B Thompson,et al.  Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer using fluorescence-enhanced optical tomography: phantom studies. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  E. Yıldırım,et al.  Serum Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Correlate with Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer , 2004, The International journal of biological markers.

[10]  R. Warren,et al.  Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy? , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  Gerald Reischl,et al.  PET with [18F]fluorothymidine for imaging of primary breast cancer: a pilot study , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  A. Padhani,et al.  Perfusion MR Imaging of Extracranial Tumor Angiogenesis , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[13]  S. Akashi-Tanaka,et al.  The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Identify Patients Likely to Be Treated Safely With Breast-Conserving Surgery , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[14]  K. Miles Functional CT imaging in oncology , 2003, European Radiology.

[15]  A. Hutcheon,et al.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. , 2003, Breast.

[16]  Torsten Mattfeldt,et al.  Imaging proliferation in lung tumors with PET: 18F-FLT versus 18F-FDG. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  H. Dittmann,et al.  [18F]FLT PET for diagnosis and staging of thoracic tumours , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  Elkan F Halpern,et al.  Invasive ductal breast carcinoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: noninvasive monitoring with functional MR imaging pilot study. , 2003, Radiology.

[19]  Sommer,et al.  Dokumentation Und Evaluation Der Weiterbildung Original Article · Originalarbeit Breast Cancer: Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Tc-99m Sestamibi Scintimammography , 2022 .

[20]  Ying Lu,et al.  Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Mark Muzi,et al.  In vivo validation of 3'deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) as a proliferation imaging tracer in humans: correlation of [(18)F]FLT uptake by positron emission tomography with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in human lung tumors. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[22]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Clinical utility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in characterizing breast lesions. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  J. Maublant,et al.  Single static view 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is related to MDR expression. , 2002, International journal of oncology.

[25]  A. Padhani,et al.  Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[26]  A. Rieber,et al.  Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy , 2002, European Radiology.

[27]  I. Smith,et al.  Efficacy and safety of Herceptin® in women with metastatic breast cancer: results from pivotal clinical studies , 2001, Anti-cancer drugs.

[28]  J. Bryant,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[29]  P J Drew,et al.  Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. , 2001, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[30]  M. Brizzi,et al.  Accuracy of mammography and echography versus clinical palpation in the assessment of response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with operable disease , 2001, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[31]  S. Dwivedi,et al.  Evaluation of total choline from in-vivo volume localized proton MR spectroscopy and its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  A. Makris,et al.  Comparison of clinical, radiological and pathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer , 2001 .

[33]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Accuracy of contrast‐enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[34]  Smith Ic,et al.  Issues involved in research into the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2001 .

[35]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sestamibi breast imaging: multicenter trial results. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Daniel J. Hawrysz,et al.  Developments toward diagnostic breast cancer imaging using near-infrared optical measurements and fluorescent contrast agents. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[37]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  P F Sharp,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  I. Gribbestad,et al.  In vivo 1H MRS of normal breast and breast tumors using a dedicated double breast coil , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[40]  T. Powles,et al.  Measurements of human breast cancer using magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a review of clinical measurements and a report of localized 31P measurements of response to treatment , 1998, NMR in biomedicine.

[41]  Otto Muzik,et al.  Imaging proliferation in vivo with [F-18]FLT and positron emission tomography , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[42]  T. Powles,et al.  A reduction in the requirements for mastectomy in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast cancer. , 1998, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[43]  T K Lewellen,et al.  Carbon-11-thymidine and FDG to measure therapy response. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Pathologic tumor response in the breast following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts axillary lymph node status. , 1998, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[46]  B. Leone,et al.  Prognostic significance of pathological response of primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. , 1998, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[47]  W. Yang,et al.  Sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and mammographic assessments of preoperative size of breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[48]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[49]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Effects of chemotherapy on pathologic and biologic characteristics of locally advanced breast cancer. , 1997, American journal of clinical pathology.

[51]  A. Cruz,et al.  Effects of preoperative chemotherapy on the morphology of resectable breast carcinoma. , 1996, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[52]  S E Harms,et al.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging , 1996, Cancer.

[53]  David J. Yang,et al.  Evaluation of preoperative chemotherapy using PET with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in breast cancer. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[54]  J E Husband,et al.  Primary breast cancer: mammographic changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pathologic correlation. , 1996, Radiology.

[55]  M. Helvie,et al.  Locally advanced breast carcinoma: accuracy of mammography versus clinical examination in the prediction of residual disease after chemotherapy. , 1996, Radiology.

[56]  J. Bergh,et al.  Positron emission tomography studies in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer: a method for early therapy evaluation? , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[57]  G Brix,et al.  MR mammography with pharmacokinetic mapping for monitoring of breast cancer treatment during neoadjuvant therapy. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[58]  D O Cosgrove,et al.  Breast carcinoma: measurement of tumor response to primary medical therapy with color Doppler flow imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[59]  R L Wahl,et al.  Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[60]  J L Sunshine,et al.  Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. , 1993, Radiology.

[61]  D. King,et al.  Mammography in the assessment of response to medical treatment of large primary breast cancer. , 1993, Clinical radiology.

[62]  J. Stack,et al.  31P MRS as an early prognostic indicator of patient response to chemotherapy , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[63]  R L Wahl,et al.  Primary and metastatic breast carcinoma: initial clinical evaluation with PET with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 1991, Radiology.

[64]  M. Merino,et al.  The effects of hormonal and chemotherapy on tumoral and nonneoplastic breast tissue. , 1990, Human pathology.

[65]  B Fisher,et al.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[66]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Management of stage III primary breast cancer with primary chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy , 1988, Cancer.

[67]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Advanced primary breast cancer: assessment at mammography of response to induction chemotherapy. , 1988, Radiology.

[68]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Pathological assessment of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 1986, Cancer research.

[69]  A. Luini,et al.  Local control and survival in early breast cancer: the Milan trial. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[70]  B Fisher,et al.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[71]  N Gunduz,et al.  Influence of the interval between primary tumor removal and chemotherapy on kinetics and growth of metastases. , 1983, Cancer research.

[72]  G. Weissmann,et al.  FATTY ACIDS AND MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, Lancet.

[73]  K L WILLIAMS,et al.  Infra-red thermometry in the diagnosis of breast disease. , 1961, Lancet.

[74]  E. Conant,et al.  Breast cancer detection based on incremental biochemical and physiological properties of breast cancers: a six-year, two-site study. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[75]  G. Cocconi,et al.  Problems in evaluating response of primary breast cancer to systemic therapy , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[76]  Daniele Regge,et al.  Monitoring Response to Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[77]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using quantitative diffuse optical spectroscopy: a case study. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[78]  A. Makris,et al.  Evaluation of good clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[79]  S. Schraub,et al.  Assessment of response by breast helical computed tomography to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in large inflammatory breast cancer. , 2002, Clinical breast cancer.

[80]  I. Smith,et al.  Issues involved in research into the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2001, Anti-cancer drugs.

[81]  L. Esserman,et al.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[82]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[83]  P. Ellis,et al.  Clinical prognostic and predictive factors for primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[84]  U. Moll,et al.  Morphologic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. , 1997, Pathology, research and practice.

[85]  M. Brizzi,et al.  Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on serum tumor markers CA 15-3, MCA, CEA, TPS and TPA in breast cancer patients with operable disease. , 1997, Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine.