The boundaries of self face perception: Response time distributions, perceptual categories, and decision weighting
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Humphreys,et al. Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] Jason P. Mitchell,et al. Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[3] Florian Waszak,et al. Across-task priming revisited: response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] J. Altarriba,et al. The effects of first- and second-language proficiency on conflict resolution and goal maintenance in bilinguals: Evidence from reaction time distributional analyses in a Stroop task* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
[5] B. Rooney,et al. Shared or Separate Mechanisms for Self-Face and Other-Face Processing? Evidence from Adaptation , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[6] Helen Keyes. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: The role of configural and featural information , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[7] Niall W. Duncan,et al. Dissociation between anterior and posterior cortical regions during self‐specificity and familiarity: A combined fMRI–meta‐analytic study , 2012, Human brain mapping.
[8] David J. Turk,et al. Mine and Me: Exploring the Neural Basis of Object Ownership , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[9] Shihui Han,et al. Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] John J. Foxe,et al. My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing , 2010, Brain and Cognition.
[11] N. Brady,et al. Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[12] Adrian Staub,et al. Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.
[13] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] Shihui Han,et al. Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition , 2009, Social neuroscience.
[15] David A. Balota,et al. Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming , 2008 .
[16] Steven M. Platek,et al. Neural correlates of self-face recognition: An effect-location meta-analysis , 2008, Brain Research.
[17] G. Northoff,et al. Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[18] James W. Tanaka,et al. The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[19] S. Hake,et al. The art and design of genetic screens: maize , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[20] Shihui Han,et al. Self-Construal Priming Modulates Neural Substrates of Self-Awareness , 2007, Psychological science.
[21] Klaus Oberauer,et al. Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[22] Jin Fan,et al. Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation , 2007, NeuroImage.
[23] Michael J Cortese,et al. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] Bryan T. Denny,et al. Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[25] Ying Zhu,et al. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study , 2006, Neuroreport.
[26] Kosha Ruparel,et al. Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self‐face from personally familiar faces , 2006, Human brain mapping.
[27] Jun Lu,et al. An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[28] Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al. Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal “mirror” network in the right hemisphere: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.
[29] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[30] Yasuhiro Maeda,et al. Cortical mechanisms of visual self-recognition , 2005, NeuroImage.
[31] Denis Cousineau,et al. Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[32] Denis Cousineau,et al. QMPE: Estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[33] F. Bermpohl,et al. Cortical midline structures and the self , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[34] J. Sommerville,et al. Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[35] A. Heathcote,et al. QMLE: Fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[36] Robert J. Rydell,et al. Expectations of consistency about the self: Consequences for self-concept formation , 2002 .
[37] R. Johnston,et al. Exploring Levels of Face Familiarity by Using an Indirect Face-Matching Measure , 2002, Perception.
[38] C. N. Macrae,et al. Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[39] T. Zandt. Analysis of Response Time Distributions , 2002 .
[40] D. Rohrer. The breadth of memory search , 2002, Memory.
[41] Scott D. Brown,et al. Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[42] Florence Thibaut,et al. ERPs ASSOCIATED WITH FAMILIARITY AND DEGREE OF FAMILIARITY DURING FACE RECOGNITION , 2002, The International journal of neuroscience.
[43] J. Tanaka. The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[44] P. Benson,et al. Recognizing one's own face , 2001, Cognition.
[45] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[46] I. J. Myung,et al. The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.
[47] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[48] K. Nakayama,et al. Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[49] D. Balota,et al. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[50] G. Fink,et al. Cerebral Representation of One’s Own Past: Neural Networks Involved in Autobiographical Memory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[51] D. Balota,et al. Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[52] Stephen J. Anderson,et al. Recollections of true and false autobiographical memories. , 1996 .
[53] M. L. Klotz,et al. Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. , 1995 .
[54] Doug Rohrer,et al. Proactive interference and the dynamics of free recall. , 1993 .
[55] D. Mewhort,et al. Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .
[56] S. Klein,et al. Two Self-Reference Effects: The Importance of Distinguishing Between Self-Descriptiveness Judgments and Autobiographical Retrieval in Self-Referent Encoding , 1989 .
[57] R. Ratcliff. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[58] Dale T. Miller,et al. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .
[59] G. Gallup. Chimpanzees: Self-Recognition , 1970, Science.
[60] R. Hohle. INFERRED COMPONENTS OF REACTION TIMES AS FUNCTIONS OF FOREPERIOD DURATION. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.
[61] Issei Fujishiro,et al. The elements of graphing data , 2005, The Visual Computer.
[62] G. Gallup,et al. Let ’ s Face It A review of The Face in the Mirror : The Search for the Origins of Consciousness , 2003 .
[63] H. Markus,et al. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .
[64] R. Duncan Luce,et al. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .