The boundaries of self face perception: Response time distributions, perceptual categories, and decision weighting

The current study uses an RT distribution analysis approach to examine the self-bias in face categorization. In two experiments we systematically manipulated the decision boundaries between the self, familiar, and unfamiliar others in face categorization tasks. For the first time in studies of self-categorization we estimated parameters from ex-Gaussian fits of reaction time distributions in order to capture the influence of different boundaries on the latency distribution of the categorization responses. The results showed that the distribution of responses to self faces was stable regardless of the face context and the task demands, and changes in context only shifted the response distribution in time. In contrast, varying the decisions with familiar and unfamiliar faces changed the shape of the RT distributions in addition to shifting RTs in time. The results indicate that, in contrast to our perception of familiar and unfamiliar faces of other people, self face perception forms a unique perceptual category unaffected by shifts in context and task demands.

[1]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Florian Waszak,et al.  Across-task priming revisited: response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Altarriba,et al.  The effects of first- and second-language proficiency on conflict resolution and goal maintenance in bilinguals: Evidence from reaction time distributional analyses in a Stroop task* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[5]  B. Rooney,et al.  Shared or Separate Mechanisms for Self-Face and Other-Face Processing? Evidence from Adaptation , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[6]  Helen Keyes Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: The role of configural and featural information , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Niall W. Duncan,et al.  Dissociation between anterior and posterior cortical regions during self‐specificity and familiarity: A combined fMRI–meta‐analytic study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[8]  David J. Turk,et al.  Mine and Me: Exploring the Neural Basis of Object Ownership , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Shihui Han,et al.  Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  John J. Foxe,et al.  My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[11]  N. Brady,et al.  Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.

[13]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Shihui Han,et al.  Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[15]  David A. Balota,et al.  Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming , 2008 .

[16]  Steven M. Platek,et al.  Neural correlates of self-face recognition: An effect-location meta-analysis , 2008, Brain Research.

[17]  G. Northoff,et al.  Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  S. Hake,et al.  The art and design of genetic screens: maize , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  Shihui Han,et al.  Self-Construal Priming Modulates Neural Substrates of Self-Awareness , 2007, Psychological science.

[21]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Jin Fan,et al.  Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Bryan T. Denny,et al.  Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[25]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study , 2006, Neuroreport.

[26]  Kosha Ruparel,et al.  Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self‐face from personally familiar faces , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Jun Lu,et al.  An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al.  Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal “mirror” network in the right hemisphere: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[29]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Yasuhiro Maeda,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of visual self-recognition , 2005, NeuroImage.

[31]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[32]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  QMPE: Estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[33]  F. Bermpohl,et al.  Cortical midline structures and the self , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  J. Sommerville,et al.  Shared representations between self and other: a social cognitive neuroscience view , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  A. Heathcote,et al.  QMLE: Fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[36]  Robert J. Rydell,et al.  Expectations of consistency about the self: Consequences for self-concept formation , 2002 .

[37]  R. Johnston,et al.  Exploring Levels of Face Familiarity by Using an Indirect Face-Matching Measure , 2002, Perception.

[38]  C. N. Macrae,et al.  Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  T. Zandt Analysis of Response Time Distributions , 2002 .

[40]  D. Rohrer The breadth of memory search , 2002, Memory.

[41]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Florence Thibaut,et al.  ERPs ASSOCIATED WITH FAMILIARITY AND DEGREE OF FAMILIARITY DURING FACE RECOGNITION , 2002, The International journal of neuroscience.

[43]  J. Tanaka The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  P. Benson,et al.  Recognizing one's own face , 2001, Cognition.

[45]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  I. J. Myung,et al.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[47]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  D. Balota,et al.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  G. Fink,et al.  Cerebral Representation of One’s Own Past: Neural Networks Involved in Autobiographical Memory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  D. Balota,et al.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Stephen J. Anderson,et al.  Recollections of true and false autobiographical memories. , 1996 .

[53]  M. L. Klotz,et al.  Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. , 1995 .

[54]  Doug Rohrer,et al.  Proactive interference and the dynamics of free recall. , 1993 .

[55]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[56]  S. Klein,et al.  Two Self-Reference Effects: The Importance of Distinguishing Between Self-Descriptiveness Judgments and Autobiographical Retrieval in Self-Referent Encoding , 1989 .

[57]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[59]  G. Gallup Chimpanzees: Self-Recognition , 1970, Science.

[60]  R. Hohle INFERRED COMPONENTS OF REACTION TIMES AS FUNCTIONS OF FOREPERIOD DURATION. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  Issei Fujishiro,et al.  The elements of graphing data , 2005, The Visual Computer.

[62]  G. Gallup,et al.  Let ’ s Face It A review of The Face in the Mirror : The Search for the Origins of Consciousness , 2003 .

[63]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[64]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .