Partisanship in Educational Research

In his empirical study of educational research, James Tooley claims to have uncovered 'partisanship' in the 'focus content and argument of educational research'. The purpose of this paper is to suggest that Tooley's study is simply one more manifestation of the failure of many educational researchers to take account of the extensive theoretical and methodological developments that have occurred over the last four decades in the political and social sciences. It is suggested that a debate about partisanship and educational research which took these developments seriously would not be a narrow debate in which researchers with right wing affinities try to score political points against researchers of the left. Instead, it would be a more intellectually rigorous and theoretically informed debate about the complex relationship between educational values and political beliefs on the one hand and research methodologies and practices on the other.

[1]  R. Bernstein Praxis and action , 1971 .

[2]  P. Feyerabend,et al.  Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge , 1976 .

[3]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[4]  J. Llewelyn Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1985 .

[5]  C. Lloyd Social theory and political practice , 1983 .

[6]  James Schmidt,et al.  The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory , 1978, Telos.

[7]  R. Rorty Solidarity or Objectivity , 1990 .

[8]  P. H. Partridge Politics, Philosophy, Ideology , 1961 .

[9]  M. Sachs Objective Knowledge , 1974 .

[10]  A. Macintyre Against the Self-Images of the Age: Essays on Ideology and Philosophy , 1971 .

[11]  Donald Davidson,et al.  On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme , 1973 .

[12]  G. Myrdal,et al.  Objectivity In Social Research , 1969 .

[13]  Charles Taylor,et al.  Neutrality in political science , 1985 .

[14]  D. Hargreaves Revitalising Educational Research: lessons from the past and proposals for the future , 1999 .

[15]  Brian Fay,et al.  Critical Social Science: Liberation and Its Limits , 1987 .

[16]  Gabriel A. Almond,et al.  Political Theory and Political Science , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Charles Taylor,et al.  Interpretation and the sciences of man , 1973 .

[18]  B. Crick Political Theory and Practice , 1969 .

[19]  Peter Halfpenny,et al.  Social Theory and Political Practice , 1976 .

[20]  M. Hesse,et al.  Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science , 1980 .

[21]  R. Bernstein The restructuring of social and political theory , 1978 .

[22]  L. Reid,et al.  An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education , 1957 .

[23]  Science and Values in Political "Science" , 1971 .

[24]  Russell Keat,et al.  The Politics of Social Theory: Habermas, Freud, and the Critique of Positivism , 1981 .

[25]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Practical Philosophy as a Model of the Human Sciences , 1979 .

[26]  I. Mészáros Ideology and Social Science , 1972 .

[27]  J. Rajchman,et al.  Post-Analytic Philosophy , 1988 .

[28]  J. Urry,et al.  Social theory as science , 1976 .

[29]  Harold I. Brown,et al.  Perception, Theory, and Commitment: The New Philosophy of Science , 1977 .

[30]  Richard J. Bernstein,et al.  Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity , 1972 .

[31]  K. Popper,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .

[32]  P. Feyerabend Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge , 1976 .

[33]  Q. Skinner III. Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action , 1974 .

[34]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[35]  B. Hindess Philosophy and methodology in the social sciences , 1977 .

[36]  Curtis B. Freed Beyond Freedom and Dignity , 1973 .

[37]  A. Macintyre The Essential Contestability of Some Social Concepts , 1973, Ethics.

[38]  A. Macintyre,et al.  Ideology, Social Science, and Revolution , 1973 .

[39]  A. Gouldner,et al.  Anti-Minotaur: The Myth of a Value-Free Sociology , 1962 .