Policy options for reducing the costs of reaching the European renewables target

European governments have agreed to increase the share of renewable energy in final energy consumption to 20% by 2020. A crucial question for policy makers is how to mobilise the additional capital investments in RE and which consumer expenditures are involved. The article describes policy options for reducing renewable energy technology (RET) project costs as well as consumer costs, based on research conducted in de Jager et al., 2011 and Rathmann et al., 2011. The results show that risk-sensitive RET policies are crucial for attracting sufficient RET investments until 2020 and achieving the targets cost-effectively. They not only reduce the RET financing costs, but also the project development costs and market gap. There are also other options that can significantly reduce the RET support costs, i.e. the adjustment of support levels to generation costs, phasing out subsidies for conventional energies, and the cost-optimisation of the supported RET portfolio, either through increased cooperation between member states or through changes in the supported technology mix. Overall, further improvement and coordination of existing policy frameworks seems more promising than drastic system changes, as the latter would create additional uncertainties and potentially negative effects on RET growth and project costs.

[1]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Assessment and optimisation of renewable energy support schemes in the European electricity market , 2007 .

[2]  R. Campbell-Howe,et al.  Proceedings of the 1997 American Solar Energy Society Annual Conference, Washington, DC, April 25-30, 1997 , 1997 .

[3]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  EU renewable energy support policy: Faith or facts? , 2009 .

[4]  Lena Neij,et al.  Experience curves for wind power , 2004 .

[5]  Ryan Wiser.  Renewable energy finance and project ownership: The impact of alternative development structures on the cost of wind power , 1997 .

[6]  The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes , 2007 .

[7]  R. Newman.  Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources , 2014 .

[8]  Martin Junginger,et al.  International and domestic uses of solid biofuels under different renewable energy support scenarios in the European Union , 2014 .

[9]  T. Johansson,et al.  European renewable energy policy at crossroads--Focus on electricity support mechanisms , 2008 .

[10]  J. Michelez,et al.  Risk quantification and risk management in renewable energy projects. , 2010 .

[11]  Patrick Lamers,et al.  Design options for cooperation mechanisms under the new European renewable energy directive , 2010 .

[12]  Karsten Burges,et al.  Pros and cons of exposing renewables to electricity market risks--A comparison of the market integration approaches in Germany, Spain, and the UK , 2008 .

[13]  G. Barbose,et al.  An analysis of residential PV system price differences between the United States and Germany , 2013, 2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[14]  C. Taylor,et al.  Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[15]  Sonja Lüthi,et al.  Analyzing policy support instruments and regulatory risk factors for wind energy deployment-A developers' perspective , 2011 .

[16]  M. Ragwitz,et al.  Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? , 2011 .

[17]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  The Price of Policy Risk - Empirical Insights from Choice Experiments with European Photovoltaic Project Developers , 2012 .

[18]  Corinna Klessmann,et al.  The evolution of flexibility mechanisms for achieving European renewable energy targets 2020—ex-ante evaluation of the principle mechanisms , 2009 .

[19]  Shahriyar Nasirov,et al.  Residential Solar PV Planning in Santiago, Chile: Incorporating the PM10 Parameter , 2014 .

[20]  K. Hamilton,et al.  Private Financing of Renewable Energy: A Guide for Policymakers , 2009 .

[21]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Technological Learning in the Energy Sector , 2008 .

[22]  B Wieczorek,et al.  The federal ministry for the environment, nature conservation and nuclear safety. , 1993, Schriftenreihe des Vereins fur Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene.

[23]  R. Tol.  The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes , 2008 .

[24]  H. M. Junginger,et al.  Learning in renewable energy technology development , 2001 .

[25]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[26]  Guohe Huang,et al.  An integrated optimization modeling approach for planning emission trading and clean-energy development under uncertainty , 2014 .