Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection

Wastewater disposal linked to earthquakes The number of earthquakes is increasing in regions with active unconventional oil and gas wells, where water pumped at high pressure breaks open rock containing natural gas, leaving behind wastewater in need of disposing. Keranen et al. show that the steep rise in earthquakes in Oklahoma, USA, is likely caused by fluid migration from wastewater disposal wells. Twenty percent of the earthquakes in the central United States could be attributed to just four of the wells. Injected fluids in high-volume wells triggered earthquakes over 30 km away. Science, this issue p. 448 The recent surge in central U.S. seismicity is likely attributable to injection of wastewater at a small number of wells. Unconventional oil and gas production provides a rapidly growing energy source; however, high-production states in the United States, such as Oklahoma, face sharply rising numbers of earthquakes. Subsurface pressure data required to unequivocally link earthquakes to wastewater injection are rarely accessible. Here we use seismicity and hydrogeological models to show that fluid migration from high-rate disposal wells in Oklahoma is potentially responsible for the largest swarm. Earthquake hypocenters occur within disposal formations and upper basement, between 2- and 5-kilometer depth. The modeled fluid pressure perturbation propagates throughout the same depth range and tracks earthquakes to distances of 35 kilometers, with a triggering threshold of ~0.07 megapascals. Although thousands of disposal wells operate aseismically, four of the highest-rate wells are capable of inducing 20% of 2008 to 2013 central U.S. seismicity.

[1]  Cliff Frohlich,et al.  Did (Or Will) Fluid Injection Cause Earthquakes? - Criteria for a Rational Assessment , 1993 .

[2]  William Walden Rubey,et al.  The Denver EarthquakeS. , 1968, Science.

[3]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Katie M. Keranen,et al.  Enhanced Remote Earthquake Triggering at Fluid-Injection Sites in the Midwestern United States , 2013, Science.

[5]  Urs Kradolfer,et al.  Initial reference models in local earthquake tomography , 1994 .

[6]  L. Seeber,et al.  Earthquakes as beacons of stress change , 2000, Nature.

[7]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Response of Regional Seismicity to the Static Stress Change Produced by the Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1992, Science.

[8]  A. Holland Optimal Fault Orientations within Oklahoma , 2013 .

[9]  Won-Young Kim,et al.  Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio , 2013 .

[10]  M. Zoback,et al.  Steady-State Failure Equilibrium and Deformation of Intraplate Lithosphere , 2002 .

[11]  Stephen P. Horton,et al.  Disposal of Hydrofracking Waste Fluid by Injection into Subsurface Aquifers Triggers Earthquake Swarm in Central Arkansas with Potential for Damaging Earthquake , 2012 .

[12]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Characterization of fluid transport properties of reservoirs using induced microseismicity , 2002 .

[13]  D. F. Sumy,et al.  Observations of static Coulomb stress triggering of the November 2011 M5.7 Oklahoma earthquake sequence , 2014 .

[14]  M. Zoback First‐ and second‐order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project , 1992 .

[15]  Brian W. Stump,et al.  Analysis of the Cleburne, Texas, Earthquake Sequence from June 2009 to June 2010 , 2013 .

[16]  Lisa V. Block,et al.  Deep-Injection and Closely Monitored Induced Seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado , 2005 .

[17]  Cliff Frohlich,et al.  Two-year survey comparing earthquake activity and injection-well locations in the Barnett Shale, Texas , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  G. Abers,et al.  Potentially induced earthquakes in Oklahoma, USA: Links between wastewater injection and the 2011 Mw 5.7 earthquake sequence , 2013 .

[19]  Won-Young Kim,et al.  A Fluid-Injection-Triggered Earthquake Sequence in Ashtabula, Ohio: Implications for Seismogenesis in Stable Continental Regions , 2004 .

[20]  W. Ellsworth Injection-Induced Earthquakes , 2013, Science.

[21]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 2000 .

[22]  T. Brocher Empirical relations between elastic wavespeeds and density in the Earth's crust , 2005 .

[23]  R. Stein The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence , 1999, Nature.

[24]  A. McGarr,et al.  Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection , 2014 .

[25]  Kyle E. Murray,et al.  State-scale perspective on water use and production associated with oil and gas operations, Oklahoma, U.S. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  T. W. Doe,et al.  State of stress, permeability, and fractures in the Precambrian granite of northern Illinois , 1983 .

[27]  Brian W. Stump,et al.  The Dallas-Fort Worth Earthquake Sequence: October 2008 through May 2009 , 2011 .

[28]  William L. Ellsworth,et al.  The 2001–Present Induced Earthquake Sequence in the Raton Basin of Northern New Mexico and Southern Colorado , 2014 .