Towards the elimination of FGM by 2030: A statistical assessment

In 2015, UN member states committed to eliminate female genital mutilation (FGM) by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Agenda. To reach this goal, interventions need to be targeted and guided by the best available evidence. To date, however, estimates of the number of girls and women affected by FGM and their trends over time and geographic space have been limited by the availability, specificity and quality of population-level data. We present new estimates based on all publicly available nationally representative surveys collected since the 1990s that contain both information on FGM status and on the age at which FGM occurred. Using survival analysis, we generate estimates of FGM risk by single year of age for all countries with available data, and for rural and urban areas separately. The likelihood of experiencing FGM has decreased at the global level, but progress has been starkly uneven between countries. The available data indicate no progress in reducing FGM risk in Gambia, Guinea-Bissau, Mali and Guinea. In addition, rural and urban areas have diverged over the last two decades, with FGM declining more rapidly in urban areas. We describe limitations in the availability and quality of data on FGM occurrence and age-at-FGM. Based on current trends, the SDG goal of eliminating FGM by 2030 is out of reach, and the pace at which the practice is being abandoned would need to accelerate to eliminate FGM by 2030. The heterogeneity in trends between countries and rural vs urban areas offers an opportunity to contrast countries where FGM is in rapid decline and explore potential policy lessons and programmatic implications for countries where the practice of FGM appears to remain entrenched.

[1]  J. Bongaarts,et al.  United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division World Family Planning 2020: Highlights, United Nations Publications, 2020. 46 p. , 2020 .

[2]  A. Dawson,et al.  Addressing female genital mutilation in the Asia Pacific: the neglected sustainable development target , 2019, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[3]  O. Uthman,et al.  Secular trends in the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among girls: a systematic analysis , 2018, BMJ Global Health.

[4]  B. Shell-Duncan,et al.  The role of older women in contesting norms associated with female genital mutilation/cutting in Senegambia: A factorial focus group analysis , 2018, PloS one.

[5]  Isabel M. L. Scott,et al.  Indirect questioning method reveals hidden support for female genital cutting in South Central Ethiopia , 2018, PloS one.

[6]  Sharmila Devi FGM in Sierra Leone , 2018, The Lancet.

[7]  J. Heymann,et al.  Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries , 2017, BMJ Global Health.

[8]  M. Valsecchi,et al.  Survival estimation in two-phase cohort studies with application to biomarkers evaluation , 2016, Statistical methods in medical research.

[9]  Sharmila Devi Uncertain future for initiative against FGM in the UK , 2016, The Lancet.

[10]  E. Loaiza,et al.  Demographic perspectives of female genital mutilation , 2016 .

[11]  B. Essén,et al.  Cultural change after migration: Circumcision of girls in Western migrant communities. , 2015, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[12]  I. Danel,et al.  Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: Updated Estimates of Women and Girls at Risk, 2012 , 2016, Public health reports.

[13]  K. Deribe,et al.  Geographic Variation and Factors Associated with Female Genital Mutilation among Reproductive Age Women in Ethiopia: A National Population Based Survey , 2016, PloS one.

[14]  I. Morhason-Bello,et al.  Survival analysis of time to uptake of modern contraceptives among sexually active women of reproductive age in Nigeria , 2015, BMJ Open.

[15]  N. Madise,et al.  Trends and protective factors of female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso: 1999 to 2010 , 2015, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[16]  J. Morgan Working towards an end to FGM , 2015, The Lancet.

[17]  P. Farina,et al.  Improving estimates of the prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among migrants in Western countries , 2015 .

[18]  Lut Mergaert,et al.  Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: interpreting existing evidence in all EU Member States , 2014 .

[19]  S. Rutstein,et al.  Making the Demographic and Health Surveys Wealth Index comparable , 2014 .

[20]  P. S. Yoder,et al.  Female genital cutting: the interpretation of recent DHS data , 2013 .

[21]  P. S. Yoder,et al.  Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in 27 African countries and Yemen. , 2013, Studies in family planning.

[22]  R. Van Rossem,et al.  Attitudes toward the discontinuation of female genital cutting among men and women in Guinea , 2006, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[23]  P. S. Yoder,et al.  Female genital cutting in the demographic and health surveys: a critical and comparative analysis , 2004 .

[24]  N. Toubia,et al.  Female genital mutilation: have we made progress? , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[25]  M. Gebre‐Medhin,et al.  Female genital mutilation in eastern Ethiopia , 2000, The Lancet.

[26]  C. Särndal,et al.  A General View of Estimation for Two Phases of Selection with Applications to Two-Phase Sampling and Nonresponse , 1987 .

[27]  Rutstein So,et al.  Guide to DHS statistics. , 2003 .