Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.

The aim of this study was to assess by means of a three-dimensional computed tomography scanning system the occlusal surface characteristics of dental casts made using two different impression materials. Alginate and polyvinyl siloxane impressions were taken of 20 dental students resulting in 40 dental casts. The casts were paired for each student separately so that each pair consisted of an alginate poured cast and a polyvinyl siloxane poured out cast. The casts were scanned using FlashCT scanner and for each cast, a three-dimensional digital image was obtained. The digitized casts were processed using the three-dimensional imaging software Geomagic Studio 9. A total of 464 paired teeth were digitally separated and superimposed. For each tooth, two measurements were obtained corresponding to the two different impression materials used. The two sets of volumes for all digitally separated teeth were compared and analysed using the Wilcoxon signed test. Larger volume measurements were obtained for teeth separated from alginate poured out casts than from their corresponding ones from polyvinyl siloxane casts (P = 0.005). When the teeth were divided into the groups of incisors, canines and premolars/molars, only the last one exhibited significant difference (P = 0.00). The mean difference between the volumes measured for all 464 teeth separated was 0.041 mm(3) (+/-0.33). The occlusal surfaces of teeth appear differently in dental casts depending on the impression materials used. Impressions of dental casts should be utilized with caution in relation to their research application and in reference with dental wear studies.

[1]  M. Yoda [Accuracy of post impressions using metal models]. , 1989, Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai zasshi.

[2]  S Y Chen,et al.  Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  Igor J Pesun,et al.  Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Accuracy of impression materials measured with a vertical height gauge. , 1990, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[5]  R DeLong,et al.  Accuracy of a System for Creating 3D Computer Models of Dental Arches , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[6]  W. Chee,et al.  Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  D C Quick,et al.  Use of a scanning laser three-dimensional digitizer for analysis of dental materials. , 1991, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[8]  J. C. Morris,et al.  Accuracy of stone casts produced by perforated trays and nonperforated trays. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  A. Ardeshir Goshtasby,et al.  A system for digital reconstruction of gypsum dental casts , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  B. Kusnoto,et al.  Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  Chee Ww,et al.  Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials. , 1989 .

[12]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[13]  D. Bartlett,et al.  The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.

[14]  Mumin Song,et al.  Overview of three-dimensional shape measurement using optical methods , 2000 .

[15]  B A Linke,et al.  Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  R Perry,et al.  Composite restoration wear analysis: conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[17]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[18]  Z Li,et al.  The research and development of noncontact 3-D laser dental model measuring and analyzing system. , 2000, The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association.

[19]  R DeLong,et al.  Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. , 2001, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[20]  D C Quick,et al.  Use of a scanning laser three-dimensional digitizer to evaluate dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  M E Brosky,et al.  Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  W. Douglas,et al.  Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.