Large scale interaction analysis predicts that the Gerbera hybrida floral E function is provided both by general and specialized proteins

BackgroundThe ornamental plant Gerbera hybrida bears complex inflorescences with morphologically distinct floral morphs that are specific to the sunflower family Asteraceae. We have previously characterized several MADS box genes that regulate floral development in Gerbera. To study further their behavior in higher order complex formation according to the quartet model, we performed yeast two- and three-hybrid analysis with fourteen Gerbera MADS domain proteins to analyze their protein-protein interaction potential.ResultsThe exhaustive pairwise interaction analysis showed significant differences in the interaction capacity of different Gerbera MADS domain proteins compared to other model plants. Of particular interest in these assays was the behavior of SEP-like proteins, known as GRCDs in Gerbera. The previously described GRCD1 and GRCD2 proteins, which are specific regulators involved in stamen and carpel development, respectively, showed very limited pairwise interactions, whereas the related GRCD4 and GRCD5 factors displayed hub-like positions in the interaction map. We propose GRCD4 and GRCD5 to provide a redundant and general E function in Gerbera, comparable to the SEP proteins in Arabidopsis. Based on the pairwise interaction data, combinations of MADS domain proteins were further subjected to yeast three-hybrid assays. Gerbera B function proteins showed active behavior in ternary complexes. All Gerbera SEP-like proteins with the exception of GRCD1 were excellent partners for B function proteins, further implicating the unique role of GRCD1 as a whorl- and flower-type specific C function partner.ConclusionsGerbera MADS domain proteins exhibit both conserved and derived behavior in higher order protein complex formation. This protein-protein interaction data can be used to classify and compare Gerbera MADS domain proteins to those of Arabidopsis and Petunia. Combined with our reverse genetic studies of Gerbera, these results reinforce the roles of different genes in the floral development of Gerbera. Building up the elaborate capitulum of Gerbera calls for modifications and added complexity in MADS domain protein behavior compared to the more simple flowers of, e.g., Arabidopsis.

[1]  P. Goloboff.  Analyzing Large Data Sets in Reasonable Times: Solutions for Composite Optima , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[2]  Richard Treisman,et al.  Isolation and properties of cDNA clones encoding SRF, a transcription factor that binds to the c-fos serum response element , 1988, Cell.

[3]  I. Sussex,et al.  Function of the apetala-1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[4]  H. Saedler,et al.  Functional analysis of the Antirrhinum floral homeotic DEFICIENS gene in vivo and in vitro by using a temperature-sensitive mutant. , 1995, Development.

[5]  E. Meyerowitz,et al.  Function and regulation of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene PISTILLATA. , 1994, Genes & development.

[6]  Victor A. Albert,et al.  Conifer homologues to genes that control floral development in angiosperms , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology.

[7]  G. Angenent,et al.  Combinatorial Action of Petunia MADS Box Genes and Their Protein Products , 2009 .

[8]  J. Zethof,et al.  Analysis of the Petunia TM6 MADS Box Gene Reveals Functional Divergence within the DEF/AP3 Lineage[W] , 2006, The Plant Cell Online.

[9]  T. Teeri,et al.  Integration of reproductive meristem fates by a SEPALLATA-like MADS-box gene. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  S. E. Perry,et al.  Control of expression and autoregulation of AGL15, a member of the MADS-box family. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[11]  Elliot M. Meyerowitz,et al.  The homeotic gene APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a MADS box and is expressed in petals and stamens , 1992, Cell.

[12]  H. Sommer,et al.  Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS‐box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[13]  H. Sommer,et al.  Characterization of the Antirrhinum floral homeotic MADS‐box gene deficiens: evidence for DNA binding and autoregulation of its persistent expression throughout flower development. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[14]  H. Sommer,et al.  Deficiens, a homeotic gene involved in the control of flower morphogenesis in Antirrhinum majus: the protein shows homology to transcription factors. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[15]  Dean Ravenscroft,et al.  Antagonistic regulation of flowering‐time gene SOC1 by CONSTANS and FLC via separate promoter motifs , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[16]  G. Theissen,et al.  Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. , 2001, Current opinion in plant biology.

[17]  T. Teeri,et al.  Patterns of MADS-box gene expression mark flower-type development in Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae) , 2006, BMC Plant Biology.

[18]  E. Meyerowitz,et al.  Arabidopsis homeotic gene APETALA3 ectopic expression: Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation determine floral organ identity , 1994, Cell.

[19]  P. Benfey,et al.  The SCARECROW Gene Regulates an Asymmetric Cell Division That Is Essential for Generating the Radial Organization of the Arabidopsis Root , 1996, Cell.

[20]  R. Martienssen,et al.  The FRUITFULL MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis fruit development. , 1998, Development.

[21]  Richard G. H. Immink,et al.  The MADS Box Gene FBP2 Is Required for SEPALLATA Function in Petunia Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.010280. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[22]  K. Goto,et al.  The Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene PISTILLATA is regulated by discrete cis-elements responsive to induction and maintenance signals. , 2000, Development.

[23]  G. Angenent,et al.  Control of Floral Meristem Determinacy in Petunia by MADS-Box Transcription Factors1[W] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[24]  M. Kater,et al.  AGL24, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE, and APETALA1 Redundantly Control AGAMOUS during Early Stages of Flower Development in Arabidopsis[W] , 2006, The Plant Cell Online.

[25]  Gerco C Angenent,et al.  Analysis of MADS box protein–protein interactions in living plant cells , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  P. Robles,et al.  The SEP4 Gene of Arabidopsis thaliana Functions in Floral Organ and Meristem Identity , 2004, Current Biology.

[27]  Stefan de Folter,et al.  SEPALLATA3: the 'glue' for MADS box transcription factor complex formation , 2009, Genome Biology.

[28]  Friedrich-Schiller-Universitaet,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Origin and Diversification of the Angiosperm Flower , 2007 .

[29]  Hong Ma,et al.  The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors , 1990, Nature.

[30]  B. Causier,et al.  An Antirrhinum ternary complex factor specifically interacts with C-function and SEPALLATA-like MADS-box factors , 2003, Plant Molecular Biology.

[31]  Y. Helariutta,et al.  Cloning of cDNA coding for dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) and characterization of dfr expression in the corollas of Gerbera hybrida var. Regina (Compositae) , 1993, Plant Molecular Biology.

[32]  W. Crosby,et al.  APETALA1 and SEPALLATA3 interact to promote flower development. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[33]  S. Masiero,et al.  Ternary Complex Formation between MADS-box Transcription Factors and the Histone Fold Protein NF-YB* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Ari Pekka Mähönen,et al.  A novel two-component hybrid molecule regulates vascular morphogenesis of the Arabidopsis root. , 2000, Genes & development.

[35]  K. Glimelius,et al.  Direct regulation of the floral homeotic APETALA1 gene by APETALA3 and PISTILLATA in Arabidopsis. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[36]  Hans Sommer,et al.  Ternary complex formation between the MADS‐box proteins SQUAMOSA, DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA is involved in the control of floral architecture in Antirrhinum majus , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[37]  M. Ouzunova,et al.  Polymorphisms in monolignol biosynthetic genes are associated with biomass yield and agronomic traits in European maize (Zea mays L.) , 2010, BMC Plant Biology.

[38]  G. Angenent,et al.  Ovule-specific MADS-box proteins have conserved protein-protein interactions in monocot and dicot plants , 2002, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[39]  G. Theißen,et al.  The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[40]  Gerco C. Angenent,et al.  Transcriptional program controlled by the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS during early organogenesis , 2005, Development.

[41]  S. Rounsley,et al.  Temporal relationship between the transcription of two Arabidopsis MADS box genes and the floral organ identity genes. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[42]  T. Teeri,et al.  Functional characterization of B class MADS-box transcription factors in Gerbera hybrida , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[43]  The Arabidopsis AGL8 MADS box gene is expressed in inflorescence meristems and is negatively regulated by APETALA1. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[44]  Yingzhen Yang,et al.  Defining subdomains of the K domain important for protein–protein interactions of plant MADS proteins , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology.

[45]  Y. Moon,et al.  Determination of the motif responsible for interaction between the rice APETALA1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 family proteins using a yeast two-hybrid system. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[46]  H. Saedler,et al.  The pollen-specific DEFH125 promoter from Antirrhinum is bound in vivo by the MADS-box proteins DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA , 2006, Planta.

[47]  A. Uimari.  Integration of meristem fates by a SEPALLATA-like MADS-box gene , 2004 .

[48]  Lucia Colombo,et al.  MADS-Box Protein Complexes Control Carpel and Ovule Development in Arabidopsis Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.015123. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[49]  H. Sommer,et al.  PFMAGO, a MAGO NASHI-like factor, interacts with the MADS-domain protein MPF2 from Physalis floridana. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[50]  G. Angenent,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Four Chrysanthemum MADS-Box Genes, Belonging to the APETALA1/FRUITFULL and SEPALLATA3 Subfamilies1 , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[51]  Koji Goto,et al.  Complexes of MADS-box proteins are sufficient to convert leaves into floral organs , 2001, Nature.

[52]  M. Yanofsky,et al.  Molecular basis of the cauliflower phenotype in Arabidopsis , 1995, Science.

[53]  Rainer Melzer,et al.  Reconstitution of ‘floral quartets’ in vitro involving class B and class E floral homeotic proteins , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[54]  Zhongchi Liu,et al.  APETALA1 and SEPALLATA3 interact with SEUSS to mediate transcription repression during flower development , 2006, Development.

[55]  A. Sharrocks,et al.  The ETS-domain transcription factors Elk-1 and SAP-1 exhibit differential DNA binding specificities. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[56]  Detlef Weigel,et al.  Comprehensive Interaction Map of the Arabidopsis MADS Box Transcription Factorsw⃞ , 2005, The Plant Cell Online.

[57]  G. Theißen,et al.  The class E floral homeotic protein SEPALLATA3 is sufficient to loop DNA in ‘floral quartet’-like complexes in vitro , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[58]  T. Teeri,et al.  Floral developmental genetics of Gerbera (Asteraceae) , 2006 .

[59]  A. Litt.  An Evaluation of A‐Function: Evidence from the APETALA1 and APETALA2 Gene Lineages , 2007, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[60]  Heinz Saedler,et al.  Plant biology: Floral quartets , 2001, Nature.

[61]  E. Meyerowitz,et al.  The Homeotic Protein AGAMOUS Controls Late Stamen Development by Regulating a Jasmonate Biosynthetic Gene in Arabidopsis[W] , 2007, The Plant Cell Online.

[62]  Y. Helariutta,et al.  Organ identity genes and modified patterns of flower development in Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae) , 1999, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[63]  H. Sommer,et al.  Multiple interactions amongst floral homeotic MADS box proteins. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[64]  T. Teeri,et al.  Characterization of SQUAMOSA-like genes in Gerbera hybrida, including one involved in reproductive transition , 2010, BMC Plant Biology.

[65]  T. Teeri,et al.  Reproductive meristem fates in Gerbera. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[66]  T. Jack,et al.  The CArG boxes in the promoter of the Arabidopsis floral organ identity gene APETALA3 mediate diverse regulatory effects. , 1998, Development.

[67]  T. Teeri,et al.  GRCD1, an AGL2-like MADS Box Gene, Participates in the C Function during Stamen Development in Gerbera hybrida , 2000, Plant Cell.

[68]  P. Auvinen,et al.  Analysis of the floral transcriptome uncovers new regulators of organ determination and gene families related to flower organ differentiation in Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae). , 2005, Genome research.

[69]  E. Craig,et al.  Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. , 1996, Genetics.

[70]  A. Sharrocks,et al.  DNA binding and dimerisation determinants of Antirrhinum majus MADS-box transcription factors. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[71]  G. Giribet,et al.  TNT: Tree Analysis Using New Technology , 2005 .

[72]  J. Bowman,et al.  Turning floral organs into leaves, leaves into floral organs. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[73]  R. Elble,et al.  A protein involved in minichromosome maintenance in yeast binds a transcriptional enhancer conserved in eukaryotes. , 1989, Genes & development.

[74]  D. Soltis,et al.  The evolution of the SEPALLATA subfamily of MADS-box genes: a preangiosperm origin with multiple duplications throughout angiosperm history. , 2005, Genetics.

[75]  E. Kramer,et al.  Genetic and Molecular Analysis of Angiosperm Flower Development , 1998 .

[76]  E. Coen,et al.  The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development , 1991, Nature.

[77]  Hong Ma,et al.  Spatially and temporally regulated expression of the MADS-box gene AGL2 in wild-type and mutant arabidopsis flowers , 1994, Plant Molecular Biology.

[78]  G. An,et al.  Analysis of the C-terminal region of Arabidopsis thaliana APETALA1 as a transcription activation domain , 1999, Plant Molecular Biology.

[79]  L. Mao,et al.  Interaction study of MADS-domain proteins in tomato. , 2008, Journal of experimental botany.

[80]  V. Irish,et al.  Functional Analyses of Two Tomato APETALA3 Genes Demonstrate Diversification in Their Roles in Regulating Floral Development[W] , 2006, The Plant Cell Online.

[81]  E. Meyerowitz,et al.  Dimerization specificity of Arabidopsis MADS domain homeotic proteins APETALA1, APETALA3, PISTILLATA, and AGAMOUS. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  R. Classen-Bockhoff.  Pattern analysis in pseudanthia , 1990, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[83]  E. Meyerowitz,et al.  AGL1-AGL6, an Arabidopsis gene family with similarity to floral homeotic and transcription factor genes. , 1991, Genes & development.

[84]  H. Sommer,et al.  GLOBOSA: a homeotic gene which interacts with DEFICIENS in the control of Antirrhinum floral organogenesis. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[85]  J. Bowman,et al.  Expression of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS is restricted to specific cell types late in flower development. , 1991, The Plant cell.