Routing Protocol Selection for Intelligent Transport System (ITS) of VANET in High Mobility Areas of Bangladesh

The ultimate objectives of VANETs are to provide safer and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) where drivers can communicate with each other in higher mobility for secure travel. In the case of the vehicular communication in Bangladesh, no ITS of VANET is practically developed so far. To implement VANET for Bangladesh, the selection of the protocols and path routing is the most common strategies that are to be focused while designing VANETs. This paper illustrates the evaluation of four routing protocols: AODV, AOMDV, OLSR, and DSDV which are applied on open street map in New Paltan area in Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Our simulations are enacted using SUMO (for vehicular movement) simulators and NS2 (for network traffic) with two ray ground propagation model and scenarios configured to mirror the conditions of real world. The simulations are made on the basis of various parameters such as Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), end-to-end average delay, jitter, and throughput. The simulation outcomes show that OLSR gains higher PDR assimilating to AODV, AOMDV, and DSDV under low network load. PDR is also quite consistent with high network load. In terms of delay, DSDV provides lower end-to-end delay as compared to other routing protocols in lower and higher network load. The OLSR protocol gains maximum average throughput in low network load but AODV outperforms OLSR and DSDV in higher congestion area. If routing overhead is the major choice then OLSR is the best-fitted protocol because it provides lower overhead in both low and high mobility situations.

[1]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Performance Evaluation of AODV, OLSR and DYMO Protocols for Vehicular Networks Using CAVENET , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems.

[2]  Patrick Weber,et al.  OpenStreetMap: User-Generated Street Maps , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[3]  Javier Gozálvez,et al.  Operation and Performance of Vehicular Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols in Realistic Environments , 2008, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[4]  Sherali Zeadally,et al.  Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETS): status, results, and challenges , 2010, Telecommunication Systems.

[5]  Imran Khan,et al.  Performance evaluation of AODV and OLSR in highly fading vehicular ad hoc network environments , 2009, 2009 IEEE 13th International Multitopic Conference.

[6]  Mashrur Chowdhury,et al.  Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication in a heterogeneous wireless network – Performance evaluation , 2016 .

[7]  Teerawat Issariyakul,et al.  Introduction to Network Simulator NS2 , 2008 .

[8]  Jérôme Haerri,et al.  Performance comparison of AODV and OLSR in VANETs urban environments under realistic mobility patterns , 2006 .

[9]  P. Kanungo,et al.  Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR and DSDV routing protocols using NS2 simulator , 2012 .

[10]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocol in VANET with Vehicle-Node Density , 2010, 2010 6th International Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM).