Long-term risk of radionecrosis and imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

Radionecrosis is a well-characterized effect of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and is occasionally associated with serious neurologic sequelae. Here, we investigated the incidence of and clinical variables associated with the development of radionecrosis and related radiographic changes after SRS for brain metastases in a cohort of patients with long-term follow up. 271 brain metastases treated with single-fraction linear accelerator-based SRS were analyzed. Radionecrosis was diagnosed either pathologically or radiographically. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine the association between radionecrosis and clinical factors available prior to treatment planning. After median follow up of 17.2 months, radionecrosis was observed in 70 (25.8 %) lesions, including 47 (17.3 %) symptomatic cases. 22 of 70 cases (31.4 %) were diagnosed pathologically and 48 (68.6 %) were diagnosed radiographically. The actuarial incidence of radionecrosis was 5.2 % at 6 months, 17.2 % at 12 months and 34.0 % at 24 months. On univariate analysis, radionecrosis was associated with maximum tumor diameter (HR 3.55, p < 0.001), prior whole brain radiotherapy (HR 2.21, p = 0.004), prescription dose (HR 0.56, p = 0.02) and histology other than non-small cell lung, breast or melanoma (HR 1.85, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, only maximum tumor diameter (HR 3.10, p < 0.001) was associated with radionecrosis risk. This data demonstrates that with close imaging follow-up, radionecrosis after single-fraction SRS for brain metastases is not uncommon. Maximum tumor diameter on pre-treatment MR imaging can provide a reliable estimate of radionecrosis risk prior to treatment planning, with the greatest risk among tumors measuring >1 cm.

[1]  C. Ogilvy,et al.  Dose-volume prediction of radiation-related complications after proton beam radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  A. Holodny,et al.  Comparison of the effectiveness of MRI perfusion and fluorine-18 FDG PET-CT for differentiating radiation injury from viable brain tumor: a preliminary retrospective analysis with pathologic correlation in all patients. , 2013, Clinical imaging.

[3]  M. Schell,et al.  Five year results of LINAC radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: outcome for large AVMS. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  R D Adams,et al.  Bragg-peak proton-beam therapy for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  The impact of whole-brain radiation therapy on the long-term control and morbidity of patients surviving more than one year after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Mark E Mullins,et al.  Radiation necrosis versus glioma recurrence: conventional MR imaging clues to diagnosis. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  Ronald L. Wolf,et al.  Posttreatment recurrence of malignant brain neoplasm: accuracy of relative cerebral blood volume fraction in discriminating low from high malignant histologic volume fraction. , 2009, Radiology.

[8]  O. Belohlávek,et al.  Brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery using the Leksell gamma knife: can FDG PET help to differentiate radionecrosis from tumour progression? , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  C. Belka,et al.  Prognostic factors for survival and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery alone or in combination with whole brain radiation therapy for 1–3 cerebral metastases , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[10]  H. Hoshi,et al.  Significance of target location relative to the depth from the brain surface and high-dose irradiated volume in the development of brain radionecrosis after micromultileaf collimator-based stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[11]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Radiosurgery and brain tolerance: an analysis of neurodiagnostic imaging changes after gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  R. Müller,et al.  Risk analysis of linear accelerator radiosurgery. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  R. Warnick,et al.  Irradiated volume as a predictor of brain radionecrosis after linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  H. Kooy,et al.  Variables associated with the development of complications from radiosurgery of intracranial tumors. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Complications from arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery: multivariate analysis and risk modeling. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Tarek Mekhail,et al.  Adjuvant Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Versus Observation after Radiosurgery or Surgical Resection of One to Three Cerebral Metastases: Results of the EORTC 22952-26001 Study , 2011, Current oncology reports.

[17]  D. Langleben,et al.  PET in differentiation of recurrent brain tumor from radiation injury. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Hiroki Shirato,et al.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy vs Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for Treatment of Brain Metastases: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007 .

[19]  R. Maciunas,et al.  12 Gy gamma knife radiosurgical volume is a predictor for radiation necrosis in non-AVM intracranial tumors. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab therapy for radiation necrosis of the central nervous system. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Bevacizumab as a treatment for radiation necrosis of brain metastases post stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2013, Neuro-oncology.

[22]  L Souhami,et al.  Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  M. McDermott,et al.  Dose conformity of gamma knife radiosurgery and risk factors for complications. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Adam P Dicker,et al.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the brain. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  M R Segal,et al.  Distinguishing Recurrent Intra-Axial Metastatic Tumor from Radiation Necrosis Following Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Using Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[26]  A. Bozzao,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[27]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Treatment-related change versus tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: a diagnostic conundrum--use of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) perfusion MRI. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Comparison of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-Fluorothymidine PET in Differentiating Radiation Necrosis From Recurrent Glioma , 2012, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[29]  L. Chin,et al.  Radiation necrosis following gamma knife surgery: a case-controlled comparison of treatment parameters and long-term clinical follow up. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Analysis of tumor control and toxicity in patients who have survived at least one year after radiosurgery for brain metastases. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.