Fixed‐film processes employing microorganisms attached to an inert surface (biofilms) are widely used for biological treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater. For optimal design and analysis of these processes, mathematical models are necessary that describe the dynamics of contaminant transport within these biofilms and the associated contaminant utilization by the microorganisms. However, these governing equations that typically involve Fickian diffusion for contaminant transport and Monod kinetics for contaminant utilization are inherently nonlinear and have no closed form solutions except under special conditions. This can restrict their use in the classroom as cumbersome numerical techniques must be used for their solution. This problem is well documented in the literature and several authors have presented pseudoanalytical solutions that replace numerical solutions with algebraic equations. In the present study, we present pseudoanalytical solution‐based computer programs for estimating substrate flux and biofilm thickness for a steady‐state biofilm. Depending upon the intended end use, these programs can either partially or totally automate the solution process. In the partial automation mode, they can serve to enhance student understanding of important concepts related to steady‐state biofilms, while complete automation can help bring more challenging and realistic problems associated with steady‐state biofilms into the classroom. The programs have been tested on MATLAB version 5.0 and are available as freeware for educational purposes. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Comput Appl Eng Educ 10: 26–32, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com.); DOI 10.1002/cae.10017
[1]
B. Rittmann,et al.
Improved pseudoanalytical solution for steady‐state biofilm kinetics
,
1988,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[2]
J J Heijnen,et al.
Mathematical modeling of biofilm structure with a hybrid differential-discrete cellular automaton approach.
,
1998,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[3]
Makram T. Suidan,et al.
UNIFIED ANALYSIS OF BIOFILM KINETICS
,
1985
.
[4]
B. Rittmann,et al.
Accurate pseudoanalytical solution for steady-state biofilms.
,
1992,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[5]
P. Mccarty,et al.
Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Applications
,
2000
.
[6]
Cristian Picioreanu,et al.
Biofilm modeling: present status and future directions
,
1999
.
[7]
Cristian Picioreanu,et al.
Constrained discounted Markov decision processes and Hamiltonian cycles
,
1997,
Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.
[8]
B. Rittmann,et al.
Development and experimental evaluation of a steady‐state, multispecies biofilm model
,
1992,
Biotechnology and bioengineering.