Electrical conductivity in Li2O2 and its role in determining capacity limitations in non-aqueous Li-O2 batteries.

Non-aqueous Li-air or Li-O(2) cells show considerable promise as a very high energy density battery couple. Such cells, however, show sudden death at capacities far below their theoretical capacity and this, among other problems, limits their practicality. In this paper, we show that this sudden death arises from limited charge transport through the growing Li(2)O(2) film to the Li(2)O(2)-electrolyte interface, and this limitation defines a critical film thickness, above which it is not possible to support electrochemistry at the Li(2)O(2)-electrolyte interface. We report both electrochemical experiments using a reversible internal redox couple and a first principles metal-insulator-metal charge transport model to probe the electrical conductivity through Li(2)O(2) films produced during Li-O(2) discharge. Both experiment and theory show a "sudden death" in charge transport when film thickness is ~5 to 10 nm. The theoretical model shows that this occurs when the tunneling current through the film can no longer support the electrochemical current. Thus, engineering charge transport through Li(2)O(2) is a serious challenge if Li-O(2) batteries are ever to reach their potential.

[1]  A S Bondarenko,et al.  Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. , 2009, Nature chemistry.

[2]  K. M. Abraham,et al.  A Polymer Electrolyte‐Based Rechargeable Lithium/Oxygen Battery , 1996 .

[3]  J. Simmons Conduction in thin dielectric films , 1971 .

[4]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Steady state oxygen reduction and cyclic voltammetry. , 2008, Faraday discussions.

[5]  W. Kohn,et al.  Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects , 1965 .

[6]  H. Jónsson,et al.  Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode , 2004 .

[7]  Boris Kozinsky,et al.  Identifying Capacity Limitations in the Li/Oxygen Battery Using Experiments and Modeling , 2011 .

[8]  B. McCloskey,et al.  Lithium−Air Battery: Promise and Challenges , 2010 .

[9]  Matthew H. Ervin,et al.  Oxygen Transport Properties of Organic Electrolytes and Performance of Lithium/Oxygen Battery , 2003 .

[10]  R M Shelby,et al.  Solvents' Critical Role in Nonaqueous Lithium-Oxygen Battery Electrochemistry. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[11]  P. Hohenberg,et al.  Inhomogeneous Electron Gas , 1964 .

[12]  John Kitchin,et al.  Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces , 2011 .

[13]  Kristian Sommer Thygesen,et al.  Localized atomic basis set in the projector augmented wave method , 2009, 1303.0348.

[14]  S. S. Sandhu,et al.  Diffusion-limited model for a lithium/air battery with an organic electrolyte , 2007 .

[15]  N. A. Romero,et al.  Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[16]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Communications: Elementary oxygen electrode reactions in the aprotic Li-air battery. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[17]  Tejs Vegge,et al.  The role of transition metal interfaces on the electronic transport in lithium–air batteries , 2011 .

[18]  J. Bass,et al.  Communication: strong excitonic and vibronic effects determine the optical properties of Li2O2. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[19]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method , 2004, cond-mat/0411218.