What determines consumer attention to nutrition labels

Abstract To identify the key determinants of consumer attention to nutrition labels, visual search tasks (present –absent; one – two targets) were used as an effective experimental tool. The main manipulation concerned: set size (number of labels on front of pack); label characteristics (display size, position of the label on front-of-pack, colour scheme); and familiarity with type of the label and its location on the front of pack. Attention capture was faster and more accurate when the label was present rather than absent, with doubled rather than standard display size, and with mono- rather than polychromatic colouring. There was performance benefit when the type of label and its location on the package did not change in two consecutive exposures, suggesting that nutrition logos should be printed in a consistent location on the package. The results confirm our hypotheses that display size, colour scheme, familiarity with the label and its location on the front of the pack are key determinants of consumer attention to labels. These findings are crucial to better understanding consumer attention to labels and thus the impact of nutrition information on healthy food choice.

[1]  Hugh Garavan,et al.  Serial attention within working memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Árni Kristjánsson,et al.  Priming in visual search: Separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal , 2008, Vision Research.

[3]  Mike Rayner,et al.  How do consumers use nutrition label information , 2002 .

[4]  A. Baddeley.  Immediate Memory and the “Perception” of Letter Sequences , 1964 .

[5]  J S Lappin,et al.  Attention in the identification of stimuli in complex visual displays. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[7]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  R. M. Warren,et al.  HELMHOLTZ ON PERCEPTION: ITS PHYSIOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT. , 1970 .

[9]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience : a reader , 2000 .

[10]  M. Posner.  Cumulative Development of Attentional Theory. , 1982 .

[11]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[12]  Gianluigi Guido.  The Salience of Marketing Stimuli: An Incongruity-Salience Hypothesis on Consumer Awareness , 2001 .

[13]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[14]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[15]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[16]  Björn N. S. Vlaskamp,et al.  Crowding degrades saccadic search performance , 2005, Vision Research.

[17]  G. Sperling,et al.  Extremely Rapid Visual Search: The Maximum Rate of Scanning Letters for the Presence of a Numeral , 1971, Science.

[18]  Alison Black,et al.  Just read the label : understanding nutrition information in numeric, verbal and graphic formats , 1992 .

[19]  Mike Daube,et al.  Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market. , 2009, Health promotion international.

[20]  I. Steenhuis,et al.  Process evaluation of two environmental nutrition programmes and an educational nutrition programme conducted at supermarkets and worksite cafeterias in the Netherlands. , 2004, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[21]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[22]  B. Green,et al.  Color coding in a visual search task. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Neuroeconomics: The Consilience of Brain and Decision , 2004, Science.

[24]  J. Jonides,et al.  The cost of categorization in visual search: Incomplete processing of targets and field items , 1976 .

[25]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  C Bundesen,et al.  Color segregation and visual search , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .

[29]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[30]  D. Norman.  Toward a theory of memory and attention. , 1968 .

[31]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[32]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  A primitive memory system for the deployment of transient attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[34]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[35]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels , 2007, Journal of Public Health.

[37]  J Brand,et al.  Classification without Identification in Visual Search , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  J. Movshon,et al.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[41]  S. Yantis.  Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes , 2002 .

[43]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[44]  Miles Richardson,et al.  An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements , 2007, Public Health Nutrition.

[45]  M. R. Solomon.  Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective , 1999 .

[46]  S. Zeki,et al.  Three cortical stages of colour processing in the human brain. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Consumer understanding and nutritional communication: key issues in the context of the new EU legislation , 2009, European journal of nutrition.

[48]  G. Cowburn,et al.  Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. , 2005 .

[49]  C W ERIKSEN,et al.  Object location in a complex perceptual field. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  W K Estes,et al.  A DETECTION METHOD AND PROBABILISTIC MODELS FOR ASSESSING INFORMATION PROCESSING FROM BRIEF VISUAL DISPLAYS , 1964 .

[51]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Attention and Preattention , 1977 .

[52]  A. Treisman.  Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[53]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[54]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial attention in early vision. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[58]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Direct access to working memory contents. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[59]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[60]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[61]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[62]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[63]  L. G. Williams,et al.  The effect of target specification on objects fixated during visual search , 1966 .

[64]  C W ERIKSEN,et al.  Location of objects in a visual display as a function of the number of dimensions on which the objects differ. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.