How an integrated diagnostic approach can help in a correct evaluation of the state of preservation of waterlogged archaeological wooden artefacts

Abstract Artefacts made of wood coming from archaeological excavations provide insights into human cultural behaviour of the past. They show how man utilised natural resources and how the development of woodworking techniques and artistic endeavour were developed. Within archaeological contexts, waterlogged anaerobic conditions generally preserve the appearance of artefacts, although wood is subject to severe decay processes. The said conditions can transform the original material into a new one, thus demonstrating specific differences from those of the “fresh” wood of the same species. In order to assess these new properties correctly, an integrated diagnostic approach is needed, one which includes a multidisciplinary (micromorphological, physical and chemical) evaluation of the state of preservation. This paper reports several diagnostic results regarding wood artefacts coming from a series of archaeological excavations carried out in Italy. Different types of artefacts – ships, furniture, foundation piles, etc. – that date to different eras (Roman times, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance) have been included in this study. In addition, several species of wood at different levels of decay were analysed. Our study provides evidence of how a multidisciplinary approach, based on anatomical (micromorphological), physical and chemical analyses, avoids goes beyond the limits of each single type of analysis, thus contributing to a complete and reliable evaluation of the state of preservation of these archaeological artefacts.

[1]  Robert A. Blanchette,et al.  Biological degradation of wood. , 1990 .

[2]  Arno P. Schniewind,et al.  Physical and Mechanical Properties of Archaeological Wood , 1990 .

[3]  Nicola Macchioni,et al.  A methodological approach in the evaluation of the efficacy of treatments for the dimensional stabilisation of waterlogged archaeological wood , 2010 .

[4]  D. Grattan,et al.  Conservation of waterlogged wood , 1987 .

[5]  G. Giachi,et al.  New trials in the consolidation of waterlogged archaeological wood with different acetone-carried products , 2011 .

[6]  Marco Orlandi,et al.  A multi-analytical study of degradation of lignin in archaeological waterlogged wood. , 2009, Talanta.

[7]  Geoffrey Daniel,et al.  Microbial decay of waterlogged archaeological wood found in Sweden Applicable to archaeology and conservation , 1999 .

[8]  L. Bonzi,et al.  Ultrastructural Modifications of Etioplasts, Related to their Position in the Leaf Tissue, in Dark-Grown Seedlings of Salvia Splendens L. upon Exposure to Continuous Light , 1981 .

[9]  J. Hedges,et al.  The chemistry of archaeological wood. , 1990 .

[10]  C. Björdal,et al.  Depth of burial, an important factor in controlling bacterial decay of waterlogged archaeological poles , 2000 .

[11]  R. Klaassen.  Bacterial decay in wooden foundation piles—Patterns and causes: A study of historical pile foundations in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[12]  G. Giachi,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF CONVENTIONAL METHODS FOR THE CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF WATERLOGGED ARCHAEOLOGICAL WOOD , 2009 .

[13]  Nicola Macchioni,et al.  THE CHARACTERIZATION OF WATERLOGGED ARCHAEOLOGICAL WOOD: THE THREE ROMAN SHIPS FOUND IN NAPLES (ITALY)* , 2008 .

[14]  Roger M. Rowell,et al.  Scope and history of archaeological wood. , 1990 .

[15]  S. Capuani,et al.  13C CPMAS NMR spectroscopic analysis applied to wood characterization , 2005 .

[16]  Nicola Macchioni.  Physical characteristics of the wood from the excavations of the ancient port of Pisa , 2003 .