The contribution of stimulus-driven and goal-driven mechanisms to feature-based selection in patients with spatial attention deficits

When people search a display for a target defined by a unique feature, fast saccades are predominantly stimulus-driven whereas slower saccades are primarily goal-driven. Here we use this dissociative pattern to assess whether feature-based selection in patients with lateralized spatial attention deficits is impaired in stimulus-driven processing, goal-driven processing, or both. A group of patients suffering from extinction or neglect after parietal damage, and a group of healthy, age-matched controls, were instructed to make a saccade to a uniquely oriented target line which was presented simultaneously with a differently oriented distractor line. We systematically varied the salience of the target and distractor by changing the orientation of background elements, and used a time-based model to extract stimulus-driven (salience) and goal-driven (target set) components of selection. The results show that the patients exhibited reduced stimulus-driven processing only in the contralesional hemifield, while goal-driven processing was reduced across both hemifields.

[1]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition , 2014 .

[2]  M. Donk,et al.  No control in orientation search: The effects of instruction on oculomotor selection in visual search , 2011, Vision Research.

[3]  P. Peigneux,et al.  Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  M. Donk,et al.  Object Salience is Transiently Represented Whereas Object Presence is Not: Evidence from Temporal Order Judgment , 2011, Perception.

[5]  M. Donk,et al.  Awareness of the saccade goal in oculomotor selection: Your eyes go before you know , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  M. Donk,et al.  The Time Course of Color- and Luminance-Based Salience Effects , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[7]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional guidance: investigating the role of the dorsal and ventral parietal cortices , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  S. Bressler,et al.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Jon Driver,et al.  Integration of Goal- and Stimulus-Related Visual Signals Revealed by Damage to Human Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Donk,et al.  Salience is only briefly represented: evidence from probe-detection performance. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Simulating posterior parietal damage in a biologically plausible framework: Neuropsychological tests of the search over time and space model , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[12]  Wieske van Zoest,et al.  Goal-driven modulation as a function of time in saccadic target selection , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Wieske van Zoest,et al.  Effects of Salience Are Short-Lived , 2008, Psychological science.

[14]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[15]  E. Miller,et al.  Response to Comment on "Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Control of Attention in the Prefrontal and Posterior Parietal Cortices" , 2007, Science.

[16]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect , 2007, Neuron.

[17]  E. Vandenbussche,et al.  The relationship of visual extinction to luminance-contrast imbalances between left and right hemifield stimuli , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  What kind of visual spatial attention is impaired in neglect? , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual Selection and Posterior Parietal Cortex: Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Partial Report Analyzed by Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Wieske van Zoest,et al.  The effects of salience on saccadic target selection , 2005 .

[21]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Hemispatial Neglect and Visual Search: A Large Scale Analysis , 2004, Cortex.

[22]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Neural correlates of the automatic and goal-driven biases in orienting spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  H. Karnath,et al.  The cortical substrate of visual extinction , 2003, Neuroreport.

[26]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Spatial and temporal influences on extinction , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual extinction with double simultaneous stimulation: what is simultaneous? , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  Searching with Unilateral Neglect , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Sylvie Chokron,et al.  Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[30]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  C. Kennard,et al.  Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  J. Driver,et al.  Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction , 2001, Cognition.

[33]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[36]  A. Pouget,et al.  Relating unilateral neglect to the neural coding of space , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  G Humphreys,et al.  Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[39]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  C. Marzi,et al.  The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  C. Rorden,et al.  Letters to Nature: Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness , 1998 .

[43]  G. Basso,et al.  Visual extinction as a spatio‐temporal disorder of selective attention , 1998, Neuroreport.

[44]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[45]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Giuseppe Di Pellegrino,et al.  Spatial extinction on double asynchronous stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Influence of Stimulus Salience and Attentional Demands on Visual Search Patterns in Hemispatial Neglect , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[48]  J. Duncan,et al.  Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[49]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Preattentive Filling-in of Visual Surfaces in Parietal Extinction , 1997, Science.

[51]  C. Kennard,et al.  Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients , 1997, Nature.

[52]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping and Extinction: Evidence for Low-level Modulation of Visual Selection , 1996 .

[53]  J. Palmer Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[54]  Elisabetta Làdavas,et al.  Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: Horizontal and vertical dimensions , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual Search for Feature and Conjunction Targets with an Attention Deficit , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Jon Driver,et al.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect , 1992, Nature.

[58]  Ian Robertson,et al.  Early rightwards orienting of attention on simple reaction time performance in patients with left-sided neglect , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  P Bartolomeo,et al.  Early orientation of attention toward the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[60]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[61]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[62]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[63]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Visual Search Performance in the Neglect Syndrome , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[65]  J. Findlay,et al.  The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[66]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[67]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[68]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  M. Posner,et al.  Neural systems control of spatial orienting. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[70]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[71]  M. Mesulam A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[72]  K. Heilman,et al.  Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[73]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Orienting of Attention Orienting of Attention* , 2022 .

[74]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[76]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Decomposing the neural mechanisms of visual search through model-based analysis of fMRI : Top-down excitation , active ignoring and the use of saliency by the right TPJ , 2012 .

[77]  G. Humphreys,et al.  BCoS Cognitive Screen , 2012 .

[78]  Wieske van Zoest,et al.  Saccadic target selection as a function of time. , 2006, Spatial vision.

[79]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[80]  W. Heide,et al.  Visual search in patients with left visual hemineglect. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[81]  H Bekkering,et al.  BRAIN'S EYE: NEUROBIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL ASPECTS OF OCULOMOTOR RESEARCH , 2002 .

[82]  W. Milberg,et al.  Preattentive and attentive visual search in individuals with hemispatial neglect. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[83]  M. Perenin,et al.  Phasic alertingof neglect patientsovercomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness , 1998 .

[84]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[85]  Jon Driver,et al.  Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection , 1994 .

[86]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[87]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[88]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  'What' and 'Where' in Visual Attention: Evidence from the Neglect Syndrome , 1992 .

[89]  Y. Takane,et al.  Structures in stimulus identification data. , 1992 .

[90]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[91]  S. Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[92]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .