Persistence of Dispersal-limited Species in Structured Dynamic Landscapes

Dynamic landscape models have generally assumed random distributions of habitat although real landscapes show spatial organization at many scales. To explore the role of spatial structure in determining the frequency of dispersal-limited forest species, we used a cellular landscape model divided into two zones. Zones were distributed in a random, clustered, or regular spatial pattern. Within each zone habitat cells were randomly destroyed and regenerated, and habitat density and turnover rate were systematically varied. A hypothetical habitat-limited species dispersed between adjacent habitat cells. All trials showed a reduced species frequency relative to a static landscape. Reduction was greater at low habitat density (P = 0.30) than at high density (0.90) suggesting the importance of habitat connectivity in controlling species frequency. The greatest reduction occurred when habitat was concentrated in a small, regularly distributed zone at low habitat density reflecting the enforced isolation of individual habitat cells. Very little reduction was observed when habitat cells were packed into a small clustered zone, a situation promoting connectivity between cells. Moderate–severe frequency reduction occurred when habitat turnover was concentrated in a clustered zone at high habitat density, but little was observed when turnover was widely distributed in a regular or random pattern. These results can be interpreted in terms of a source-sink function in which spatial pattern controlled the degree of contact between landscape zones and determined opportunities for dispersal between habitat cells. We conclude that clustering of forest habitat has the potential to maintain herb species frequency in sparsely forested landscapes. Conversely, clustering of forest disturbance in heavily forested regions, or regular distribution of forest stands (as often occurs in agricultural regions) creates areas which are difficult to colonize, and should be avoided.

[1]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes , 1999 .

[2]  G. Matlack Land use and forest habitat distribution in the hinterland of(r)a large city , 1997 .

[3]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Predicting the spread of disturbance across heterogeneous landscapes , 1989 .

[4]  L. Brooker,et al.  Animal Dispersal in Fragmented Habitat: Measuring Habitat Connectivity, Corridor Use, and Dispersal Mortality , 1999 .

[5]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  EFFECTS OF SUCCESSIONAL DYNAMICS ON METAPOPULATION PERSISTENCE , 2003 .

[6]  S. Visher Mans Role in Changing the Face of the Earth , 1957 .

[7]  Curtis H. Flather,et al.  Patchy Reaction‐Diffusion and Population Abundance: The Relative Importance of Habitat Amount and Arrangement , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  Simulating dispersal of reintroduced species within heterogeneous landscapes , 2004 .

[9]  D. Foster From coastal wilderness to fruited plain , 1995 .

[10]  R. Kadmon,et al.  Testing for source-sink population dynamics : an experimental approach exemplified with desert annuals , 1999 .

[11]  Oscar E. Gaggiotti,et al.  Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations , 2004 .

[12]  Glenn R. Matlack,et al.  Consequences of low mobility in spatially and temporally heterogeneous ecosystems , 2004 .

[13]  John B. Dunning,et al.  Patch Isolation, Corridor Effects, and Colonization by a Resident Sparrow in a Managed Pine Woodland , 1995 .

[14]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Toward a Metapopulation Concept for Plants , 2004 .

[15]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[16]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment , 1992 .

[17]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Analysis of patterns in hierarchically structured landscapes , 1993 .

[18]  G. Cumming Habitat Shape, Species Invasions, and Reserve Design: Insights from Simple Models , 2002 .

[19]  A. King,et al.  Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  Lattices and landscapes , 1993 .

[21]  Dazhong Wen Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1997 .

[22]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Spread of invading organisms , 1990, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  L. Fahrig Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[24]  Karin Johst,et al.  Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance , 2002 .

[25]  M. Cain,et al.  SEED DISPERSAL AND THE HOLOCENE MIGRATION OF WOODLAND HERBS , 1998 .

[26]  M. Vellend,et al.  METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS IN CHANGING LANDSCAPES: A NEW SPATIALLY REALISTIC MODEL FOR FOREST PLANTS , 2004 .

[27]  J. A. Litvaitis,et al.  Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems: Forest edges , 1999 .

[28]  M. Willson Dispersal mode, seed shadows, and colonization patterns , 1993 .

[29]  P. Hogeweg Cellular automata as a paradigm for ecological modeling , 1988 .

[30]  G. Matlack Four centuries of forest clearance and regeneration in the hinterland of a large city , 1997 .

[31]  David R. Foster,et al.  Land-Use History (1730-1990) and Vegetation Dynamics in Central New England, USA , 1992 .

[32]  R. Forman Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1995 .

[33]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization , 1996 .

[34]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics: a brief his-tory and conceptual domain , 1991 .

[35]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Regina Lindborg,et al.  HISTORICAL LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY AFFECTS PRESENT PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY , 2004 .

[37]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics in Changing Environments: Butterfly Responses to Habitat and Climate Change , 2004 .

[38]  D. Foster,et al.  Legacies of the agricultural past in the forested present: an assessment of historical land‐use effects on rich mesic forests , 2002 .

[39]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Large‐scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations , 2002 .

[40]  Marc P. Armstrong,et al.  Landscape fragmentation and dispersal in a model of riparian forest dynamics , 1990 .

[41]  David E. Hiebeler,et al.  Populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities : Landscape generation and local dispersal , 2000 .

[42]  M. Hermy,et al.  An integrated analysis of the effects of past land use on forest herb colonization at the landscape scale , 2003 .

[43]  Margaret Game,et al.  HISTORICAL FACTORS AFFECTING THE NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION OF VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES IN THE WOODLANDS OF CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE , 1984 .

[44]  R. H. Gardner,et al.  Quantifying scale-dependent effects of animal movement with simple percolation models , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .

[46]  O. Honnay,et al.  Forest Biodiversity: Lessons from History for Conservation , 2004 .

[47]  N. J. Ouborg,et al.  Isolation, population-size and extinction - the classical and metapopulation approaches applied to vascular plants along the Dutch Rhine system , 1993 .

[48]  M. Vellend,et al.  Environmental causes and consequences of forest clearance and agricultural abandonment in central New York, USA , 2005 .

[49]  Michael Williams,et al.  Americans and their forests , 1989 .

[50]  O. Honnay,et al.  Land-use history and forest herb diversity in Tompkins County, New York, USA. , 2004 .

[51]  G. von Oheimb,et al.  Migration of vascular plants to secondary woodlands in southern Sweden , 1998 .

[52]  P. Marks,et al.  Two hundred years of forest cover changes in Tompkins County, New York' , 1993 .

[53]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly , 2002 .

[54]  Anthony W. King,et al.  Analysis of landscape sources and sinks: the effect of spatial pattern on avian demography , 2001 .

[55]  I. Hanski Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[56]  G. Matlack,et al.  Influence of stand age and physical environment on the herb composition of second‐growth forest, Strouds Run, Ohio, USA , 2006 .

[57]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Dynamics Of Complex Systems , 2019 .

[58]  Jorge X Velasco-Hernández,et al.  Extinction Thresholds and Metapopulation Persistence in Dynamic Landscapes , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[59]  Johan Ehrlén,et al.  DISPERSAL LIMITATION AND PATCH OCCUPANCY IN FOREST HERBS , 2000 .

[60]  A. Bennett,et al.  Corridor use and the elements of corridor quality: chipmunks and fencerows in a farmland mosaic , 1994 .

[61]  T. Snäll,et al.  Colonization-extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape , 2005 .

[62]  G. Matlack Slow plants in a fast forest: local dispersal as a predictor of species frequencies in a dynamic landscape , 2005 .

[63]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems , 2000 .

[64]  G. Matlack PLANT SPECIES MIGRATION IN A MIXED-HISTORY FOREST LANDSCAPE IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA' , 1994 .