Behavioral thresholds to electric signals in high frequency electric fish

Summary1) The behavioral thresholds ofApteronotus andEigenmannia to imposed sine wave electric fields were measured as a function of stimulus frequency using operant conditioning techniques. 2)Apteronotus responds to a broad range of frequencies. Its threshold—frequency curve is complex, showing three distinct threshold dips at: <5–15 Hz, 0.6–0.9 μV/cm; 200–300 Hz, 0.9 μV/cm; and 700–2200 Hz to 0.2 μV/cm. The high frequency dip itself is bimodal, with a primary minimum at the fish's electric organ discharge (EOD) fundamental, and a secondary minimum at its second harmonic. 3) The threshold—frequency curve forEigenmannia differs in several respects, being unimodal and sharpely tuned to the fish's EOD frequency with a sensitivity of 0.2–0.3 μV/cm.Eigenmannia shows a lack of keen low frequency perception, and no marked sensitivity increase at the second harmonic of its EOD. 4) The EOD wave forms ofApteronotus andEigenmannia were Fourier analysed:Eigenmannia's EOD approximates a sine wave, whileApteronotus' EOD contains considerable power at harmonic frequencies. 5) It is proposed that behavioral thresholds to frequencies within ca. 50–100 Hz of the fish's EOD fundamental or second harmonic are improved by the fish's extraction of, and preference for, low frequency beats of its EOD with the stimulus. This is suggested by the sharp, EOD specific tuning demonstrated by bothEigenmannia andApteronotus and the second harmonic sensitivity peak ofApteronotus, which are not predicted by known receptor response characteristics. Such a beat extraction capability might provide a mechanism for improving the resolution of conspecific electrocommunication. 6) The influence of water resistivity on the behavioral thresholds ofApteronotus was measured. High frequency sensitivity increases as a power function with decreasing water resistivity down to 1 k Ohm · cm, below which it remains constant. Low frequency sensitivity increases progressively from 100 k Ohm · cm down to 10 k Ohm · cm, but decreases again below this value. Thus low frequency eleotroreceptors are maximally sensitive in 10 k Ohm · cm water, while high frequency receptors function best in water below 1 k Ohm · cm.

[1]  T Szabo,et al.  Electroreceptor mechanisms in a high-frequency weakly electric fish, Sternarchus albifrons. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[3]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  The Detection of Electric Fields from Inanimate and Animate Sources Other Than Electric Organs , 1974 .

[4]  A. Roth Zur Funktionsweise der Elektrorezeptoren in der Haut von Welsen (Ictalurus): Der Einfluß der Ionen im Süßwasser , 1971, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[5]  R. H. Hamstra,et al.  Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: high-frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish, Eigenmannia. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  F. Erskine,et al.  Electrical sensitivity of a weakly electric fish , 1967 .

[7]  Theodore H. Bullock,et al.  Species Differences in Effect of Electroreceptor Input on Electric Organ Pacemakers and Other Aspects of Behavior in Electric Fish; pp. 102–118 , 1969 .

[8]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Electrolocation of objects in the electric fishEigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei) , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[9]  J. L. Larimer,et al.  Sensory feedback from electroreceptors to electromotor pacemaker centers in gymnotids. , 1968, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  H. W. Lissmann On the Function and Evolution of Electric Organs in Fish , 1958 .

[11]  L. Storey,et al.  An investigation of whistling atmospherics , 1953, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[12]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fish , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[13]  C. Hopkins,et al.  Lightning as Background Noise for Communication among Electric Fish , 1973, Nature.

[14]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Bioelectric Fields in Sea Water and the Function of the Ampullae of Lorenzini in Elasmobranch Fishes , 1972 .

[15]  P. Black-Cleworth,et al.  The Role of Electrical Discharges in the Non-Reproductive Social Behaviour of Gymnotus carapo (Gymnotidae, Pisces) , 1970 .