Effectiveness of a Concept Teaching Routine in Enhancing the Performance of LD Students in Secondary-Level Mainstream Classes

The purpose of this study was to design and evaluate the effectiveness of Concept Diagrams and a related Concept Teaching Routine when used by regular class teachers to present concepts to heterogeneous groupings of students, including learning disabled pupils, in regular classrooms. The study focused upon both teachers and students. The teachers' ability to prepare Concept Diagrams and to implement a Concept Teaching Routine in the classroom was measured. Students were evaluated relative to performance on Tests of Concept Acquisition, regular classroom tests, and notetaking before and after implementation of the Concept Teaching Routine. Results indicated that teachers can select concepts from content material, prepare Concept Diagrams from those concepts, and present concepts to their classes. Both students with learning disabilities and students without learning disabilities showed gains in their performance on Tests of Concept Acquisition and in notetaking when the Concept Teaching Routine was used in the classroom. Gains in performance on regular tests were associated with the Concept Teaching Routine combined with a review procedure.

[1]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Concept Learning Effectiveness Using Prototype and Skill Development Presentation Forms. , 1981 .

[2]  Herbert J. Klausmeier,et al.  Effects of a Definition and a Varying Number of Examples and Nonexamples on Concept Attainment. , 1975 .

[3]  D M Baer,et al.  Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[4]  D. Deshler,et al.  Setting demand variables: a major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent , 1984 .

[5]  J. Goodlad.  A Place Called School , 1984 .

[6]  C. S. Englert.  Measuring Teacher Effectiveness from the Teacher's Point of View. , 1984 .

[7]  Jean B. Schumaker,et al.  Activating the Inactive Learner: Advance Organizers in the Secondary Content Classroom , 1987 .

[8]  Ok-Choon Park,et al.  Example Comparison Strategy Versus Attribute Identification Strategy in Concept Learning , 1984 .

[9]  Herbert J. Klausmeier,et al.  Learning and teaching concepts : a strategy for testing applications of theory , 1980 .

[10]  C. Sleeter.  Learning Disabilities: The Social Construction of a Special Education Category , 1986, Exceptional children.

[11]  M. Will.  Educating Children with Learning Problems: A Shared Responsibility , 1986, Exceptional children.

[12]  W. Stainback,et al.  A Rationale for the Merger of Special and Regular Education , 1984, Exceptional children.

[13]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[14]  J. Birch,et al.  A Follow-Up Study of 52 Learning Disabled Adolescents , 1985, Journal of learning disabilities.

[15]  E. Yalow.  On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[16]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Teaching Reading Vocabulary , 1978 .

[17]  D. Ausubel.  The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. , 1963 .

[18]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Exemplar and nonexampler variables which produce correct concept classification behavior and specified classification errors. , 1972 .

[19]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The conditions of learning, 2nd ed. , 1970 .

[20]  D. Deshler,et al.  Learning Strategies: An Instructional Alternative for Low-Achieving Adolescents , 1986, Exceptional children.

[21]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[22]  C. Myers.  Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[23]  Richard I. Arends,et al.  Why Innovative Programs Are Discontinued. , 1983 .

[24]  Potential Means of Enhancing Content Skills Acquisition in Learning Disabled Adolescents. , 1985 .

[25]  H. Walberg,et al.  The Necessary Restructuring of Special and Regular Education , 1987, Exceptional children.

[26]  Philip A. Cusick.  The egalitarian ideal and the American high school : studies of three schools , 1983 .